Any Mosin shooters/collectors out there?

[JonF 79]

I recently jumped into the foray of Mosin Nagants when shooting/buying guns in common calibers was next to impossible during the great hoarding shortage of 09. I picked up an M44 from Gander Mountain in the winter than a 91/30 in the spring plus a few cans of ammo. My M44 seems to have a sewer pipe bore but shoots so-so. Actually, i haven't spent much time with it since i've been shooting the M91 more since i put a scout scope on it. This is actually my first centerfire rifle so i've been messing around with it trying to get used to the art of long range rifle shooting down at Ft Dix Range 14. Frankly i'm not that happy with the scout scope since its just a low mag pistol scope with fixed parallax and shooting out past 100 is tough. So much so that i'm gonna take the scout scope off and put on a traditional rifle scope with a receiver mount that does not alter the rifle. I already have the mount and a bent bolt on the way, just need to settle on a scope. These $100 rifles add up quick! In the mean time, i have to get the M44 out there and shoot with the irons again. Do any of you folks have a nagging case of Mosinitis? :mrgreen:

 

[djg0770 481]

m44

no scope

thought of doing what you did - ie the long eye relief and I don't like the way it looks.

 

I'll just suffer the iron sights a little longer

[JonF 79]

Yeah, i'm not too enthralled with it either. it was a fun experiment but it has its share of shortfalls. The next setup i want to try is this traditionally positioned mount from advanced rifle parts. It does not require any alteration to the rifle whatsoever thereby preserving the originality of the piece.

 

http://www.advancedrifleparts.com

 

[djg0770 481]

Holy Crp Batman - I should pay as much for a SCOPE MOUNT as for a rifle? And then I have to find a bent bolt and scope? I think I'll save up for a Rem 700.

[usnmars 136]

For the money, i would put an original scope and mount on it. Make yourself a PU sniper. If the gun is just a 91-30 without any special markings and not a 91, just go for it. They are fun and quite easy to do, pretty much all you need is a drill press and good tap. It is also quite fun going enemy at the gates style at the range. :mrgreen:

[JonF 79]

Holy Crp Batman - I should pay as much for a SCOPE MOUNT as for a rifle? And then I have to find a bent bolt and scope? I think I'll save up for a Rem 700.

 

Fair enough, but if i gave you a free Rem 700 SPS rifle, would you never spend a dime on shooting it because ammo/accessories cost more than the free gun? I understand the juxtaposition and contrasts of costs here but it just so happens that mosins are exceptionally inexpensive whereas the other stuff (mounts, scopes, etc) carry more common market appropriate costs. Plus its fun to experiment!

[JonF 79]

My friend had this old Sun computer lying around from the 90's and donated it to the shooting trip. The chassis is made of much heavier sheet metal than current computers and although its probably only about 18" square, its a tank! I set it up at the max distance at the range which is 225 yards and the Mosin 91/30 was perforating it with ease! A couple shots with the tokarev managed to puncture through the parts with minimal steel and only dent the spots with multiple layers. Those shots weren't easy to make with the tokarev pistol at that distance as there were way more misses than hits.

[djg0770 481]

Holy Crp Batman - I should pay as much for a SCOPE MOUNT as for a rifle? And then I have to find a bent bolt and scope? I think I'll save up for a Rem 700.

 

Fair enough, but if i gave you a free Rem 700 SPS rifle, would you never spend a dime on shooting it because ammo/accessories cost more than the free gun? I understand the juxtaposition and contrasts of costs here but it just so happens that mosins are exceptionally inexpensive whereas the other stuff (mounts, scopes, etc) carry more common market appropriate costs. Plus its fun to experiment!

 

I understand your point. Certainly understand the experiment portion. I was considering using the M44 as a hunting rifle (obviously outside NJ) and now I'm not so sure as I would really want a scope on a hunter and I would prefer not to drill and tap a receiver to do so.

[Lugnut 0]

Have a 1941 Izzy 91/30 that I have yet to get to the range. Nice #s mtaching gun though with a decent stock and a clean barrel that wasn't counter bored

 

 

 

 

 

It was an arsenal refurb coated in cosmoline. Picked up a post war sling as well as a bayonet for it. Now just need to see how it shoots.

 

I briefly toyed with the idea of a scope, but I decided I didn't want to muck around with a clean vintage rifle, even if it was only $85. I'd rather see if I can learn to shoot the iron sights well.

[Lublin 3]

Left: 1941 Izhevsk M91/30 with laminate stock, bluing in great condition, no counterbore

Right: 1943 Tula M91/30 ex-sniper, bluing in great condition, no counterbore

 

Soon to come: M38 and Polish M44

 

[djg0770 481]

where'd you get the 2nd one rich?

[Lublin 3]

where'd you get the 2nd one rich?

 

Same place, same price. 8-)

[Maksim 1,504]

great lookers.

 

I saw an m44, 1952, numbers matching in amazing condition, possibly refinished stock, at Cabelas in maine in their gun library.... $299.

[Lublin 3]

I'd rather see if I can learn to shoot the iron sights well.

 

Good choice. I'll be taking the same route. If they did it, you can do it. Takes time.

[coldsolderjoint 84]

Left: 1941 Izhevsk M91/30 with laminate stock, bluing in great condition, no counterbore

Right: 1943 Tula M91/30 ex-sniper, bluing in great condition, no counterbore

 

Soon to come: M38 and Polish M44

 

 

Is your bayonet properly affixed? Looks like the one on the right is just sitting on the muzzle

[Lublin 3]

Is your bayonet properly affixed? Looks like the one on the right is just sitting on the muzzle

 

Left one - yes, right one - no. It's a tight fit for the right one and I didn't feel like having to muscle it off. I'm going to have to polish the inside diameter of the bayonet hoop.

[coldsolderjoint 84]

I should have kept mine.. I love bayonets. I'm going to have to buy another one (or 4)

[coldsolderjoint 84]

For some reason, I'm digging the hex receiver. I think it looks cooler.

 

Maybe after I get back from vacation.

[Lublin 3]

For some reason, I'm digging the hex receiver. I think it looks cooler.

 

Maybe after I get back from vacation.

 

A hex is a must have.

[Joe_D 0]

I have a 1942 Finnish M39 (Sako barrel) that I just shot for the first time last weekend. I was impressed by the accuracy off a rest using surplus ammo and iron sights. The Finns really knew how to get the most out of the Mosin. I have a feeling that this particular rifle will shoot better that I can aim but I am stubbornly resisting a scope right now to see if I can master, or at least become competent with the iron sights.

 

Next up, I hope to find a good Russian M38 or M44 (when funds permit).

[ronoverdrive 0]

$100 rifle? You serious? I always thought these things were more then that. I should pick myself up one for that price tag.

[Lublin 3]

$100 rifle? You serious? I always thought these things were more then that. I should pick myself up one for that price tag.

 

Act fast because they've gone up.

[Lugnut 0]

they can be had on Gun Broker for less if you keep you eye out, mine was $85, bought a couple of months back, but as he said, they have been creeping up in price. Its largely a function of when a whole bunch of them are imported at once and dumped on the market, you'll see decent ones for around $100. Finns are obviously at a premium, as are Hex receiver Tulas and ex-snipers

[coldsolderjoint 84]

J&G has them for $79,

 

but you have to pay shipping and ffl transfer, so your looking at ~$130ish

[docwalt 1]

It' for sure....lose the scope.