Jump to content
Scott Lane

Beretta 92 vs m9 which one?

Recommended Posts

I'm looking to get a 9mm or 40 was thinking Beretta trying to find out the real differance. Going to use it on paper that's it. Any help or info. Would be helpful

 

 

M9

 

But you should but you should buy the 92 on the market place its a great price

 

Why do you want a beretta now Scotty?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm looking to get a 9mm or 40 was thinking Beretta trying to find out the real differance. Going to use it on paper that's it. Any help or info. Would be helpful

 

.40 would be the Beretta 96 / 96a1 / 96d / etc

 

M9 is only available in 9mm.

 

That being said, 2 good reasons to buy M9:

 

that sexy Straight Dust Cover & "US M9" stamped on the gun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To checker50 I don't have a beretta pistol yet.

Diamondd817 I know m is in 9mm after I was thinking I have the storm in 40 so more clips/ less ammo

 

The PX4 and 92/96 magazines are not interchangeable. I have the PX4 .40, 92, & 96. The 9mm is much more fun to shoot from the 92 platform.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

m9 m9a1 92a1 92fs -9mm It's all about preference with these models, they all basically shoot the same.

 

96a1 -.40 Has the buffer to manage recoil + the rail adds some extra weight to the front.

 

those would be your best options for Beretta in the 92 style.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should see which one has the upradeable front sight and get that one. I am not sure the M9A1 has that feature, but I think the 92A1 does.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless he want's night sites, i dont really find it to be much of a deal breaker.

 

To me it is. Even if I don't want to upgrade now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ramsey's in Ledgewood had the compact Beretta 92. It was a nifty little gun, but the grip size and distance to the trigger looked to be about the same dimensions. If it had a slightly smaller grip, I might have been interested. It would make a nicer carry gun, though, especially if it could use the full-size magazines. Still, if I was getting a 92FS or variation, I would prefer the larger one with the longer sight radius.

 

This is pretty cool:

 

92FS In Combat. WOW!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I just ordered a sight pusher from brownells for my 92, if you need to make some sight adjustments LMK

 

 

Let us know how it works and how you like it. I was interested in one, until I saw the price. Now I'm waiting to hear more about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I use an Alien Gear cloak tuck (IWB) with my Shield.  Neoprene back - in the summer it does feel warm but doesn't rub or chafe.   https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-iwb-holster.html Could also go with the shapeshift as it has multiple options - OWB/IWB, Appendix... https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-shapeshift-modular-holster-system.html
    • The  12-1 compression ratio L88 is long gone. This is GM's updated version. it might be  pump gas 10-1 engine The L88 was a aluminum head  cast iron block engine with a nasty solid lifter cam. the  ZL1 was a all aluminum  12 or 13-1 compression ratio engine with the best forged internal parts at the time and had a even nastier solid lifter cam 
    • I like my regular carry holster.  OWB leather with belt slots.  I've been carrying for over a year and it was comfortable and I hardly even noticed it.  I carry (usually) a Ruger LCP .380 - light, convenient, tiny. But...today I ended up taking it off an leaving it home after a few hours. I cut down a big maple tree a few days ago and I spent 3/4 of today loading and unloading firewood into the back of my truck and a trailer.  It was a warm day, I was dirty, tired, sweaty, and my holster was rubbing against my side.  The leather and exposed metal snap was no longer comfortable. I'm thinking about adding a layer of something to that part of the holster to soften the contact.  Anything insulating will make it worse.  I don't want a sweaty, hotter holster against my skin.  I'm imagining something thin, breathable, that won't absorb sweat, and softer than leather, metal snaps, and rivets.   But I have no idea what would work. I'm hoping somebody else has already figured this out and I can just do what they did. Any suggestions appreciated.
    • Check the primers on the ammo you didn't shoot yet. Are they fully seated? If the primer is not just below flush with the back of the case, the first hit can seat it better then the second hit ignites it. 
    • And, charging your car at home? We've got you covered! California braces for new electric plan: Make more, pay more | Fox Business
×
×
  • Create New...