Jump to content
n4p226r

rail length vs barrel length

Recommended Posts

there seems to be a few different ways of doing this. assuming you have a low profile block, how far towards the end of the barrel do you like your rail to go. i was considering a 13.5" rail on a 14.5" barrel with pinned bc1.5 but not sure. so what do you use, and post pictures if you can!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I like dissipator like setups. 13.x" tubes on 16" is the right thing IMO. For a 14.5" I'd probably call the 11-12" normal length rifle tubes max.

 

You want enough to brave all the way up, but not so much that if you do a thumb on top wrap and point with the index finger grip you wind up with your finger on catching muzzle blast. Depending on your muzzle device it can cause you harm.

 

I have long arms, big hands and long fingers.

 

Also, if your grip and index doesn't use the whole tube, why add the weight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

There's look, and there's function. I like the looks of 15" tubes on a 16", but the function of the 13" is hard to beat, and it still looks good. With a 14.5" you bring everything 1.5" closer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Since this is NJ and you have to pin and weld the comp no matter what I would suggest a 14.7" with a standard A2 length comp which brings the overall length to 16.1". I just ordered a 14.7" CMMG M4 barrel for my next build which will have a 12.5" Daniel Defense RIS II and an EGW A2 comp pinned and welded. The goal is to build a NJ legal version of this except the barrel will be .2" longer:

 

DSC03233-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's look, and there's function. I like the looks of 15" tubes on a 16", but the function of the 13" is hard to beat, and it still looks good. With a 14.5" you bring everything 1.5" closer.

 

True but while I like the look, I also like the function, Im 6'5 so a 13" rail lets me get my hand out to where Im comfortable. The weight difference is minimal, a 13" troy trx extreme rail only weighs 1.5oz more than the same 11" rail. https://spreadsheets...2DQ&output=html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

True but while I like the look, I also like the function, Im 6'5 so a 13" rail lets me get my hand out to where Im comfortable. The weight difference is minimal, a 13" troy trx extreme rail only weighs 1.5oz more than the same 11" rail. https://spreadsheets...2DQ&output=html

 

In general, don't trust the weights in that chart. A lot of them are off.

 

As for the Troy, I like them, but they are not the most rigid. It's a trade off for the weight, and with other handguards, it'll cost you more in weight.

 

I'm about 6'6" and like the 13" tube. However a 12" rifle length is very workable, and depending on the design of the muzzle device, is the length I'd go with for a 14.5. I like my fingers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is another issue to consider, where do you want your front sight? I really dislike front sights mounted on handguards. First, if your handguard is not perfectly aligned, neither is your front sight. Secondly, I've seen handguards move over time, and third the whole point of a free float handguard is that it takes the stress and pressure away from the barrel .. but guess what ... it does that by bending and moving a bit, screwing with your front sight.

 

I've reached the conclusion that the right answer is a barrel mounted front sight, even if it isn't and actual gas block. I run a clamp on front sight in front of the handguard, even though the gas block is somewhere under it. It frees up space on top of the handguard where my thumb wants to be anyway, it isn't affected by handguard movement, and folded out of the way it kinda looks cool too.

 

However to make this work, you need a handguard that is not THAT long, the front sight tower needs to fit somewhere on the barrel. On a 16" barrel a 12-13" handguard works on a 14.5 with pinned comp probably you need something in 11" range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • There is no press that you can just sit on a table.  They need to be bolted down securely so there is no flexing.  They do make complete stands that work good too.  I agree with the fact that the Lee Classic turret is a great starter press.  You cant realize the full speed of a progressive when you are first starting off.  You NEED to go SLOW until you learn the ropes.
    • Single stage will have a tighter tolerance, and you have more control over the process.  Progressives are for bulk range fodder. Every experienced reloader gave me the same advice when I was getting into the hobby, start with single stage, so you can truly understand the reloading process and what you have to do on your end to make great ammo.  Once you have mastered that, then you can think about a progressive. If you want to add a bit of convenience to your single stage reloading, a turret press (rotates the dies, not the shell plate) is probably better suited.  It is still effectively a single stage operation, but you don't have to keep removing and remounting dies. I'm not sure what you mean by this.  Whatever press you get, it will have to be secured to a work surface in some way.  I bought an inexpensive 20"x20" work surface from HF to permanently mount my shotshell press on.  It is mounted very sturdy and durable with the added 1/2" hardwood plank and extra big washers. If you haven't already, you should check out some of the reloading channels on YT.  Ultimate Reloader is one of my faves, but there are scores of others with great advice.  See it in action.
    • The 550 is not a true progressive as it does not auto index, right? I'm in the process of selling myself on a XL750. For a starter press, you can't go far wrong with a Lee Classic Turret. It is cheap, auto indexes, and swapping calibers is easy. NB. If you go for a manually indexed press and work multiple cartridges at once, be particularly careful to monitor the powder drop stage to avoid no powder or double charges. With an auto indexing press the risk is way lower.
    • The Dillon 550's are amazing machines.  Plenty fast, and while there are faster machines in the Dillon lineup, the trade-off is that the faster ones take longer to change between calibers, and the caliber conversion kits are more expensive.   You can use the 550 as a single stage press, one cartridge in the shell plate at a time, rotating between the stations after each handle pull.  It's a good way to start out and gain experience. I've got a single stage press as well, used for larger rifle cartridges and the occasional oddball handgun cartridge that I don't shoot enough to justify the cost of a caliber conversion kit for the Dillon...but it sounds like those use cases aren't in your immediate future.    
    • Why is the single stage an advantage exactly? Could I not build them on the progressive? 
×
×
  • Create New...