NJ.com poll on more background checks

[wooly bugger 1]

NJ.com is predictably using the Navy Yards shooting to promote their political agenda.

They're irrationally asking if the incident should spur new Congressional action on background checks. They guy presumably passed his NICS, so not clear how expanding background checks would have helped. But never mind logic.

Here's the poll. Irradiate it.

 

http://www.nj.com/hudson/voices/index.ssf/2013/09/poll_should_the_navy_yard_shoo.html

[njpilot 671]

Done.

625 no vs 38 yes.

[El-Groucho 0]

Done.  We are clobbering the poll as usual, which usually gets no further reporting...

[EX Carnival man 223]

Done. How many times are they going to visit this issue

[plode 0]

Voted!

 

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

[svt3183 14]

750/39 now

[T Bill 649]

Makes no difference.  Now all over the media is a poll result by Rutgers-Eagleton saying 70% NJ want more gun control.  Of course only 932 people polled offer voice for whole state of 5.2 million eligible voters.  Less than 2 tenths of one %. But, reported by media, now its truth>

[mark_anthony_78 0]

OK, so 65% of the people who sit on their ass and don't really care one way or the other voted in a phone poll...

 

100% of the pro-2A, NRA, NJ2AS, ANJRPC, etc. members actually got up and did something to let Christie and Sweeney know that these bills are a crock of s**t.

 

Phone polls are useless... we're active, determined, and VOCAL.

[W2MC 1,699]

Most likely the poll is made with "Do you still beat your wife?" type questions.