Jump to content
big five

Hey guys.I'm pretty lost on buying sights.

Recommended Posts

http://www.dawsonprecision.com/ProductDetail.jsp?LISTID=80001927-1391889703. I need help picking sights.

 

I know I want a wide notch rear sight because my eye sight sucks. I want a FO front sight and an all black rear. I don't know if a wide sight or skinny one is best.. I cant firgure out the big difference in terms of functionality btw the tactical and competition rear sight...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Call Dawson and talk to them. 

 

Everyone has different eyes, but personally I prefer my front sight to be the exactly half the width of the rear sight width, when perceived from the shooting position. That means that when measured the front has a to be a bit  thicker then half the rear opening, but the length of the slide also comes into the perceived relative sizes. 

 

Generally Dawson are pretty good about providing the right advice if you tell them what you want to end up with. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I went through a lot of changes with my rear sight, but I did notice my shooting accuracy increased alot when I went from a wide (.140) rear sight notch, to a smaller one (.125 ) , paired with a .125 wide front sight with fiber optic on my 6 inch barrel leaves very little space on the sides , allowing me a nice clean easy way to line up a shot

 

IMO having a wide rear notch for rear does nothing beneficial for accuracy. Unless your going for the whole * combat* sight picture, quick and dirty, thoigh I have no problem lining up quick shots with my setup at speed, and still be able to ring an 8 inch plate at 50 yards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of the width of the rear sight notch or the front blade, a general rule of thumb is the more light on either side of the front blade, the quicker it is to pick-up, but the less precise. The less light means more precision and less speed. I have various combinations ranging from .125"/,125" (which Alec prefers), to .140" / .125", to .125" / .100". The consistent component with all of these arrangements is a FO front with a plain black rear. The one I seem to shoot the best (not the quickest - I'm too old for quick - Alec is quick) is the .125" / .125". I think that "young eyes" don't give-up much with this combination.

 

JMHO

 

Adios,

 

Pizza Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^ What he said

 

I'll only add that the more narrow front sight will make it easier to be precise at distance because your target it's less likely to disappear behind the sight. However, depending on your eyesight, too narrow a sight can be hard to see at all.

 

Sent from my SCH-I800 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • We never let then inside.  Last re-evaluation was 6-7 years ago, wife politely told him that he was welcome to look around the property and he could look in the windows. He saw two white resin chairs in the basement and told her that this constituted a finished basement. And everything in the basement is bare concrete/ cinder block, and mechanical systems. Nothing finished about it. Ultimately he relented and I'm sure that was a ploy to coerce us to allow him in
    • I use an Alien Gear cloak tuck (IWB) with my Shield.  Neoprene back - in the summer it does feel warm but doesn't rub or chafe.   https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-iwb-holster.html Could also go with the shapeshift as it has multiple options - OWB/IWB, Appendix... https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-shapeshift-modular-holster-system.html
    • The  12-1 compression ratio L88 is long gone. This is GM's updated version. it might be  pump gas 10-1 engine The L88 was a aluminum head  cast iron block engine with a nasty solid lifter cam. the  ZL1 was a all aluminum  12 or 13-1 compression ratio engine with the best forged internal parts at the time and had a even nastier solid lifter cam 
    • I like my regular carry holster.  OWB leather with belt slots.  I've been carrying for over a year and it was comfortable and I hardly even noticed it.  I carry (usually) a Ruger LCP .380 - light, convenient, tiny. But...today I ended up taking it off an leaving it home after a few hours. I cut down a big maple tree a few days ago and I spent 3/4 of today loading and unloading firewood into the back of my truck and a trailer.  It was a warm day, I was dirty, tired, sweaty, and my holster was rubbing against my side.  The leather and exposed metal snap was no longer comfortable. I'm thinking about adding a layer of something to that part of the holster to soften the contact.  Anything insulating will make it worse.  I don't want a sweaty, hotter holster against my skin.  I'm imagining something thin, breathable, that won't absorb sweat, and softer than leather, metal snaps, and rivets.   But I have no idea what would work. I'm hoping somebody else has already figured this out and I can just do what they did. Any suggestions appreciated.
    • Check the primers on the ammo you didn't shoot yet. Are they fully seated? If the primer is not just below flush with the back of the case, the first hit can seat it better then the second hit ignites it. 
×
×
  • Create New...