Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
siderman

1.7 vs 1.9 twist

Recommended Posts

I understand that the 1.7 twist allows for a heavier bullet allowing a truer flight for longer distance. So whats the pro of having a lighter bullet from a 1.9 twist? Is it more accurate at shorter range(100 yds)? I'm referencing for AR's such as BushMsster 5.56.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well for one price. Lighter bullets are cheaper all thing being equal. In my experience 1/7 shoots 55gr bullets just fine, it only starts having issues with the lighter varmint bullets (like 50gr and below). If you are hunting prairie dogs you might want those lighter bullets, but then the odds are you also want a even slower twist that 1/9.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well for one price. Lighter bullets are cheaper all thing being equal. In my experience 1/7 shoots 55gr bullets just fine, it only starts having issues with the lighter varmint bullets (like 50gr and below). If you are hunting prairie dogs you might want those lighter bullets, but then the odds are you also want a even slower twist that 1/9.

 

Vlad, it would depend on what you define as just fine. In my recent tests of Wolf 62 grain , Privi 62 grain and Wolf 55 grain out of BC 16" 1:7 barrel, the 55 grainers performed the worst of the three. I got about 1.5 MOA out of Wolf 62s, Just under 2 MOA on Privi 62s and around 2.5-3 MOA with 55 grain wolf. I will be the first to admit that the sample here is not huge. I also did not measure the groups so these are eyeball results. But there does seem to be some visible degradation in performance. On the other hand, in my experience with wolf it can be less than consistent from case to case (and maybe even box to box). I seem to recall shooting decent groups with 55 grain wolf out of that barrel when I first got it...but now I have to wonder if I was using 62 grain and not 55.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right tool for the job... as other posters said...

 

Practice 55gr is cheaper than 62gr and up

Varmint 50gr bullets with hollow cavities for rapid expansion would be a use also

 

Nobody says you absolutely cannot shoot 55gr out of a 1:7. Just that the general consensus is you will not get as good as accuracy you would from using heavier bullets. Also, it has been noted that there is a potential for overspin, and the jacket coming apart on the bullet from this condition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So let me see- lighter bullets(55, under) are preffered for 1-9 and are cheaper. The more heavier bullets want the 1-7 twist. But what about performence over different distences? And can you still shoot the lighter bullets thro 1-7 and heavy bullets thru 1-9? If you could only have one barrell to mix it up what would that be?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you can mix just fine. Heavier bullets are "better" at longer ranges, they buck the window better, have higher BC, etc. In a 1/9 you can shoot up to 69gr bullets but that will be dependent on bullet with diminishing returns, the low end being around 45-50gr depending on bullet weight. In a 1/7 the low end is 55gr and the high end around 75. Again, different bullet profiles behave differently so each barrel will act a bit different with each bullet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've seen 1:8 spoken of as an ideal compromise. Can apparently go as heavy/long as 77gr, but still pretty accurate when shooting lighter bullets. Only thing is that they seem to only be offered in stainless steel barrels without chrome lining.

 

A government profile, 1/8, chromed lined, rifle length gas system is my ideal barrel really, and thanks to some people in a different thread here I now found someone who is very close (no chrome lining) and for a reasonable price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • We never let then inside.  Last re-evaluation was 6-7 years ago, wife politely told him that he was welcome to look around the property and he could look in the windows. He saw two white resin chairs in the basement and told her that this constituted a finished basement. And everything in the basement is bare concrete/ cinder block, and mechanical systems. Nothing finished about it. Ultimately he relented and I'm sure that was a ploy to coerce us to allow him in
    • I use an Alien Gear cloak tuck (IWB) with my Shield.  Neoprene back - in the summer it does feel warm but doesn't rub or chafe.   https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-iwb-holster.html Could also go with the shapeshift as it has multiple options - OWB/IWB, Appendix... https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-shapeshift-modular-holster-system.html
    • The  12-1 compression ratio L88 is long gone. This is GM's updated version. it might be  pump gas 10-1 engine The L88 was a aluminum head  cast iron block engine with a nasty solid lifter cam. the  ZL1 was a all aluminum  12 or 13-1 compression ratio engine with the best forged internal parts at the time and had a even nastier solid lifter cam 
    • I like my regular carry holster.  OWB leather with belt slots.  I've been carrying for over a year and it was comfortable and I hardly even noticed it.  I carry (usually) a Ruger LCP .380 - light, convenient, tiny. But...today I ended up taking it off an leaving it home after a few hours. I cut down a big maple tree a few days ago and I spent 3/4 of today loading and unloading firewood into the back of my truck and a trailer.  It was a warm day, I was dirty, tired, sweaty, and my holster was rubbing against my side.  The leather and exposed metal snap was no longer comfortable. I'm thinking about adding a layer of something to that part of the holster to soften the contact.  Anything insulating will make it worse.  I don't want a sweaty, hotter holster against my skin.  I'm imagining something thin, breathable, that won't absorb sweat, and softer than leather, metal snaps, and rivets.   But I have no idea what would work. I'm hoping somebody else has already figured this out and I can just do what they did. Any suggestions appreciated.
    • Check the primers on the ammo you didn't shoot yet. Are they fully seated? If the primer is not just below flush with the back of the case, the first hit can seat it better then the second hit ignites it. 
×
×
  • Create New...