Jump to content
jcerillo70

GSG 522 pistol legal in NJ???

Recommended Posts

Im looking at these GSG 522 pistol's. And was wondering if these are NJ Legal.

 

-the really is no muzzle extending out to even put a brake on

-The mag is capped at 10

-Yes it does have a pistol grip

-No bayo lug

 

But the part where i get confused it when it comes down to not having a stock...

 

---------------

 

another firearm i would be interested in is the Czech scorpion. The same deal, external magasine , no butt stock, etc

 

Thanks guys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im looking at these GSG 522 pistol's. And was wondering if these are NJ Legal.

 

-the really is no muzzle extending out to even put a brake on

-The mag is capped at 10

-Yes it does have a pistol grip

-No bayo lug

 

But the part where i get confused it when it comes down to not having a stock...

 

---------------

 

another firearm i would be interested in is the Czech scorpion. The same deal, external magasine , no butt stock, etc

 

Thanks guys

 

asking about pistol.. but posting rifle AWB qualifiers...

 

a pistol is considered an AW and illegal IF

 

A: it is banned by name

 

or

 

B: the ability to accept a detachable magazine AND has at least TWO of the following:

 

(1) An ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;

(2) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor,

forward handgrip, or silencer;

(3) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles the barrel and

that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being

burned;

(4) Manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded

(5) A semi-automatic version of an automatic firearm; and

 

 

illegal IMO...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It weighs more than 50 oz's. -- WEIGHT: 84.8 oz http://www.galleryofguns.com/genie/default.aspx?item=GERG522PKB10

 

Everyone knows that once a pistol exceeds 50oz it comes to life and annihilates every

living thing around it. There's nothing anyone can do to stop it. Common knowledge

really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Everyone knows that once a pistol exceeds 50oz it comes to life and annihilates every

living thing around it. There's nothing anyone can do to stop it. Common knowledge

really.

Ridiculous or not 50oz is the limit..Don't like it? move out of state or run for office.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im looking at these GSG 522 pistol's. And was wondering if these are NJ Legal.

 

-the really is no muzzle extending out to even put a brake on

-The mag is capped at 10

-Yes it does have a pistol grip

-No bayo lug

 

But the part where i get confused it when it comes down to not having a stock...

 

---------------

 

another firearm i would be interested in is the Czech scorpion. The same deal, external magasine , no butt stock, etc

 

Thanks guys

Scorpion is legal, you just can't have the 20 round mags.

 

That GSG 522 most likely not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the Skorpian and if its NJ legal

Do i call the NJSP to double check? Or call CDNN (The seller)

 

 

find an ffl who will transfer... that is normally a pretty good start..

 

 

a pistol is considered an AW and illegal IF

 

A: it is banned by name

 

or

 

B: the ability to accept a detachable magazine AND has at least TWO of the following:

 

(1) An ammunition magazine that attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip;

(2) A threaded barrel capable of accepting a barrel extender, flash suppressor,

forward handgrip, or silencer;

(3) A shroud that is attached to, or partially or completely encircles the barrel and

that permits the shooter to hold the firearm with the non-trigger hand without being

burned;

(4) Manufactured weight of 50 ounces or more when the pistol is unloaded

(5) A semi-automatic version of an automatic firearm; and

 

I see (1) as a problem.. rest seems ok? don't know about (5) it is pretty vague but IS there a fully auto version? I am not that knowledgeable about this series of firearms..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does #5 really matter? Is the Glock 17 banned because of the Glock 18? (rhetorical)

 

 

without nit picking.. I will just say this.. number 5 is yet another example of how law does not follow practice..

but with that said..

Glock does not satisfy TWO qualifiers.. only one.. thus legal.. :icon_e_wink:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

find an ffl who will transfer... that is normally a pretty good start..

 

 

 

 

I see (1) as a problem.. rest seems ok? don't know about (5) it is pretty vague but IS there a fully auto version? I am not that knowledgeable about this series of firearms..

 

There is a full auto version, But like you guys said about the Glocks... So i mean, maybe ill call up and see

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a full auto version, But like you guys said about the Glocks... So i mean, maybe ill call up and see

 

that would make it illegal as the law is literally written...

 

glock only satisfies one dis-qualifier and therefore is legal..

 

but it is all up to you.. (and your participating FFL)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd still call that Scorpion illegal. To me, there's enough room between the magazine and the bare barrel to hold with your support hand. Although it's not a "shroud", I think it is still disqualified because the pistol satisfies #1, #3, and possibly #5. I would imagine that in order for it to be a "semi-automatic version of an automatic firearm", it would also have to be the same caliber. Isn't this pistol a .22? If so, I don't think it would qualify for #5 unless there was an automatic version in .22.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd still call that Scorpion illegal. To me, there's enough room between the magazine and the bare barrel to hold with your support hand. Although it's not a "shroud", I think it is still disqualified because the pistol satisfies #1, #3, and possibly #5. I would imagine that in order for it to be a "semi-automatic version of an automatic firearm", it would also have to be the same caliber. Isn't this pistol a .22? If so, I don't think it would qualify for #5 unless there was an automatic version in .22.

 

 

the part you would "hold" is the receiver and the barrel is forward of that.. the barrel is out in the open.. IMO of course..

 

I almost feel like 5 exists so they can screw you if they feel like it..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd still call that Scorpion illegal. To me, there's enough room between the magazine and the bare barrel to hold with your support hand. Although it's not a "shroud", I think it is still disqualified because the pistol satisfies #1, #3, and possibly #5. I would imagine that in order for it to be a "semi-automatic version of an automatic firearm", it would also have to be the same caliber. Isn't this pistol a .22? If so, I don't think it would qualify for #5 unless there was an automatic version in .22.

The Scorpion's only evil feature is #1, there is no shroud and if you fire it enough you could get burned since it's all metal. #5 would be a reach on any gun, and this one has been changed from the FA design - it doesn't have the ability to accept a collapsible stock, nor does it have a threaded barrel - aside from the semi components.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.americantactical.us/1694/detail.html

 

Still don't get why this would be a no go? Weight is 48oz. No shroud. Only 1 evil the magazine.

If it is indeed 48oz (it doesn't say that in your link) it would be legal as far as I can tell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

without nit picking.. I will just say this.. number 5 is yet another example of how law does not follow practice..

but with that said..

Glock does not satisfy TWO qualifiers.. only one.. thus legal.. :icon_e_wink:

Actually the Glock DOESNT count...Just to pick nits. The G-18 was a Select-fire Copy of a semiautomatic pistol..Not the other way around. The Model 17 was developed first, the 18 was derived from the 17's design.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • We never let then inside.  Last re-evaluation was 6-7 years ago, wife politely told him that he was welcome to look around the property and he could look in the windows. He saw two white resin chairs in the basement and told her that this constituted a finished basement. And everything in the basement is bare concrete/ cinder block, and mechanical systems. Nothing finished about it. Ultimately he relented and I'm sure that was a ploy to coerce us to allow him in
    • I use an Alien Gear cloak tuck (IWB) with my Shield.  Neoprene back - in the summer it does feel warm but doesn't rub or chafe.   https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-iwb-holster.html Could also go with the shapeshift as it has multiple options - OWB/IWB, Appendix... https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-shapeshift-modular-holster-system.html
    • The  12-1 compression ratio L88 is long gone. This is GM's updated version. it might be  pump gas 10-1 engine The L88 was a aluminum head  cast iron block engine with a nasty solid lifter cam. the  ZL1 was a all aluminum  12 or 13-1 compression ratio engine with the best forged internal parts at the time and had a even nastier solid lifter cam 
    • I like my regular carry holster.  OWB leather with belt slots.  I've been carrying for over a year and it was comfortable and I hardly even noticed it.  I carry (usually) a Ruger LCP .380 - light, convenient, tiny. But...today I ended up taking it off an leaving it home after a few hours. I cut down a big maple tree a few days ago and I spent 3/4 of today loading and unloading firewood into the back of my truck and a trailer.  It was a warm day, I was dirty, tired, sweaty, and my holster was rubbing against my side.  The leather and exposed metal snap was no longer comfortable. I'm thinking about adding a layer of something to that part of the holster to soften the contact.  Anything insulating will make it worse.  I don't want a sweaty, hotter holster against my skin.  I'm imagining something thin, breathable, that won't absorb sweat, and softer than leather, metal snaps, and rivets.   But I have no idea what would work. I'm hoping somebody else has already figured this out and I can just do what they did. Any suggestions appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...