Jump to content
fatty

Tavor / X95 Zeroing distance

Recommended Posts

At what distance do you guys sight in your Tavor/X95's?  I've got a 1/2" riser on my Tavor SAR, so the height over bore is roughly 4" making things a bit inconvenient.

Could I get away with using the ballistics chart for a 100 yard zero and just compensate for the distance?  I understand it's not ideal...  but according to the chart my POI should be 1.5" low at 50 yards, so I'm thinking to just mark a few targets as such?  A 100yard zero is so much flatter than a 50zero out a little past 200 yards.

50 yard zero = 5.3" high at 200 yards

100 yard zero = 0.63" low at 200 yards

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe their sights are at 100. Unlike a lot of complaints, mine out of the box was spot on at 100. So, did my optics the same way.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Use a ballistic calculator on your phone. Plug in your scope line over bore height, your bullet and bullet velocity, and start playing with different zero's in the app and look at the resulting trajectories.

Keep in mind that different bullets at different velocities will behave very differently, so pick your bullet wisely.

There are a few apps you can choose from, Strelok and Ballistic first come to mind.

One you find a trajectory that matches your preference, look at its zero distance and use that or look at the offset at 100 and zero at 100 so you have the same offset. Then verify at different distances that the trajectory matches what was calculated.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use Ballistic AE... very good app for that... also MD Ballistics. Also very good. I have all of them. ;)
I have Strelok but it gives me a headache. Dunno how that app has such a following. Ugly and difficult to navigate if you don't use it a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I struggled with the Strelok app for several months before I finally got the hang of it.

The best part of that app (for me at least) has been the MPBR formula. I used that function to to figure out the maximum point blank range for XM193 ammo and used that data to zero my Tavor and AR. The Tavor has a Vortex Strikefire in a ADM mount.

The formula had me zero both guns at about 1.5" high at 100 yards and this gets me point-and-shoot at 200 yards using a  6-inch target (or whatetver the exact yardage is at the base of the berm at Range 14). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys.  I just used www.shooterscalculator.com to get some quick figures and it gives a lot of info.  I have strelok on my phone but it gives me a headache as well so I resorted to my laptop and just printed out a few charts.

I guess I'll go with my original plan and set a few targets POA > POI (-1.5") to mimick a 100yard zero and verify once I can get to an actual 100 yard range lol

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I chatted via email with the Strelok guy. IMHO, not the best programmer. Cartoonish, etc. I asked him a simple question. When he adds scopes, could he sort them in alphabetical order so you can browse them easier. Also, the Brand of scope before the other info. He said, why? Just search. Now I'm not a programmer, at least not for decades. But I'm sure most of the info in that ap is called up within a database of sort. Seems just like laziness.  Every other app can be browsed except his. I'll reiterate. Ballistic AE or MD Ballistics. MD is nice but the author does not keep up with it. AE, the author is always on the ball.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dunno if Ballistic is available on Android, I use it on an iphone. Strelok should be available on both, and both work equally well with Strelok having more reticle information. 

I think that getting used to these sort of apps is really important specially if you want to make calculations on the range. I often do my maths on the range with chrono out to measure the velocity and paper targets to verify the results. Once you have it figured out once, you dont have to worry about unless you change ammo. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most of the published manufacturers ammo velocities will based on 20" barrels, and sometimes as long as 24". Few publish velocities for shorter barrels. M193 is nominally 3,260 fps from a 20" barrel but you are using a 16" barrel you are going to see significantly lower velocities. Depending on individual barrel, powder, etc you may be as low as 3,000 fps which will make a significant difference as the range gets longer and will throw all the math into disarray, and a high sight over bore only makes those errors larger. If you really want to know your trajectory you must know how fast the bullets are leaving YOUR gun, not even one like it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/13/2017 at 6:45 AM, bhunted said:

I use Ballistic AE... very good app for that... also MD Ballistics. Also very good. I have all of them. ;)
I have Strelok but it gives me a headache. Dunno how that app has such a following. Ugly and difficult to navigate if you don't use it a lot.

Ballistic ae.   I can not still get it to work correctly for me.  Iphone.     Id prefer strelock but you need an android for that. Right??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ballistic ae.   I can not still get it to work correctly for me.  Iphone.     Id prefer strelock but you need an android for that. Right??

Strelok is on iphone. Not sure about Android.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/13/2017 at 6:45 AM, bhunted said:

I use Ballistic AE... very good app for that... also MD Ballistics. Also very good. I have all of them. ;)
I have Strelok but it gives me a headache. Dunno how that app has such a following. Ugly and difficult to navigate if you don't use it a lot.

Ballistic ae.   I can not still get it to work correctly for me.  Iphone.     Id prefer strelock but you need an android for that. Right??   Ok.  Ill check on that. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • NJGunForums Web Banner Ad october 2020[40397].jpg

  • V1-Odin-mini-Rifle-300x2501.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • It's back ordered till "estimated" Dec 21.
    • I thought they were known as "shaggin wagons". 
    • I had to show this wagon because one of my friend's father had one, although not in the condition below. I remember he asked to take us for a ride on RT 287 in NJ in the mid '70s. At that time going up towards Bedminster was still pretty light in traffic, especially after working hours. Well 3 or 4 of us were trying to find a polite way of declining because what teenager wanted to tool around in a station wagon. They weren't cool. Well we learned a thing or two about engines, especially when he opened it up on the Interstate! I couldn't believe a stodgy, heavy wagon could move like that!  1969 Chevrolet Kingswood 427 Station wagons are not usually thought of as muscle-cars, but the Kingswood deserves the label as it is a proper pavement punisher. In 1969, if you were picky with the options packages, you could order the big family truckster with the 427 cubic-inch Turbo-Jet V8, pushing 390-horsepower through a four-speed manual transmission.   With all the kids strapped in, and despite weighing more than all the moons of Jupiter, the Kingswood could achieve a 0-60 mph time of 7.2 seconds and run the quarter-mile in 15.6 seconds. That’s not bad for a wagon the size of Texas designed for family hauling.   "And some like two guns. But one's all you need if you can use it..." - Shane           I have to repeat something. We're talking a station wagon off the line, not one of these one-offs that were made for racing by the car companies. "0-60 mph time of 7.2 seconds and run the quarter-mile in 15.6 seconds." Remember in 1969 the Kawasaki Mach III 500 had these numbers. It packed 50 odd HP and 12 second quarter mile times into a $999 package! www.cycleworld.com/sport-rider/1969-kawasaki-mach-iii-500/
    • Buyer's Club Info$69.34   Non-Member$72.99     https://www.sportsmansguide.com/product/index/eley-target-ammunition-22lr-lrn-40-grain-500-rounds?a=1581972   Not a horrible price considering most ammo is 3-4x the price. This is about 1.5-2x the price for .22LR. It's supposed to ship before the end of the month.
    • Well it seems that they just got a case to go to District Court with carry. The NRA is taking some certified instructor that wanted a CCR but was turned down. I don't know why we just don't go straight to SCOTUS, because we know the district and circuit courts will turn the case down. I would love NJ to one of the 1st new shall states with our new SCOTUS majority. :)  
×
×
  • Create New...