Zeke

Godspeed

To my friends, May the wind be at your back and the path under your feet be smooth. And since it's well past noon, CHEERS!

Looks good! You could substitute or add a rubber gromet ( find at Lowe's and depot)

It would appear your friend figured out a way of disposing unfired ammo.....

I'm in!

Now I want to wrap my Polynesian grilled meatloaf in bacon! And smoke it. Bacon rilly is the best vegetable

I installed some interlocking ones in my toy hauler. Purchased from homer depot. I used tin snips to cut the border. I'd estimate they are prolly 1/2" thick and heavy. Not super soft. I know what you mean, I can tell when I've been on concrete all day. Maybe you should be gellen?

I stumble corrected. My apologies. Sooo who's gonna be a test case for that?

Only pellet guns I've seen are in .177 or .22. Your point is moot

The ATF definition is causing me displeasure.But the SCOTUS ruling was for " possession " Ownership and possession are different things. What would be a proper name for just the shocker?( no explosion)

Paintball.

Partying a little early bro?

ATF on stun guns https://www.atf.gov/file/55511/download 27 CFR 178.11: MEANING OF TERMS (Also 179.11) A hand-held device designed to expel by means of an explosive two electrical contacts (barbs) connected by two wires attached to a high voltage source in the device classified as a firearm. ATF Rul. 76-6 [status of ruling: Active; Amplified by ATF Rul. 80-20] The Bureau has been asked to determine the applicability of Titles I and II of the Gun Control Act of 1968 (Chapter 44 of Title 18 U.S.C., and Chapter 53 of Title 26 U.S.C. (National Firearms Act)) to a device known as the Taser, a hand-held device designed to expel by means of an explosive two electrical contacts (barbs) connected by two wires attached to a high voltage source in the device. Upon contact with an individual, a high voltage electrical charge is carried to the barbs by the wires which temporarily immobilizes the victim. The term “firearm” as used in 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(3)(A) includes “any weapon (including a starter gun) which will or is designed to or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive.” The Bureau has determined that the device is a weapon and notwithstanding the fact that the barbs and wires remain attached to the hand-held device after expulsion, these items are projectiles within the meaning of the statute. Since the projectiles are expelled by the action of an explosive, the weapon is a firearm under 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(3)(A). With respect to the National Firearms Act, the term “any other weapon” in 26 U.S.C. 5845(e) generally means a weapon or device capable of being concealed on the person from which a shot can be discharged through the energy of an explosive. Such term does not include a pistol or a revolver having a rifled bore, or rifled bores, or weapons designed, made, or intended to be fired from the shoulder and not capable of firing fixed ammunition. Since the Taser meets the statutory definition, it is an “any other weapon” (26 U.S.C. 5845(e)). Held, a hand-held device designed to expel by means of an explosive two electrical contacts (barbs) connected by two wires attached to a high voltage source in the device is a “firearm” within the purview of 18 U.S.C. 921(a)(3)(A). It is also an “any other weapon” under the National Firearms Act (26 U.S.C. 5845(e)). In order to allow persons manufacturing and dealing in such weapons to comply with the provisions of Chapter 44 and 27 C.F.R. Part 178, this ruling will be applicable to such weapons manufactured within the United States on or after May 1, 1976. Such weapons manufactured before May 1, 1976, will not be treated as subject to the provisions of Chapter 44 and 27 C.F.R. Part 178. With respect to the “any other weapon” classification under the National Firearms Act, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. 7805(b), this ruling will not be applied to such weapons manufactured before May 1, 1976. Accordingly, such weapons manufactured on or after May 1, 1976, will be subject to all the provisions of the National Firearms Act and 27 CFR Part 179.

http://www.njgunforums.com/forum/index.php/topic/84637-why-is-bloomberg-funding-gun-control/#entry1084426You're invited to the party

" if it wasn't for Bloomberg, there would be no gun control agenda...."What's he's deal. Help me help you help me figure out his agenda.

replace gfci

Lol. Well thanks for the last barrage. Eventually all of us will follow if this retreat trend continues.

^^^^ good read Ha ha, atleast have a functional knowledge of what you advocate against. Alloway? Hell ya!

This correlates to the mass exodus of R's and leaning R indy's. Locally your vote counts.

Another interesting thing is the denial of services hack that happened a few months ago. All of these " things" were used. Lol I'm embracing the tech. My wife still puts stickers over her laptop cameras. Maybe a tinfoil cozy for Alexa?

http://www.sportsmansguide.com/product/index/stack-on-low-pro-motorized-safe?a=408030 I have 2 of these bolted to the floor under her and my sides of the bed. 4 years 0 hiccups. I change the batteries when I do the smoke detectors. It has enough room for my 229 elite stainless and my j frame together. And still has room for extra mags and booolits. At night I tend to leave it open befor slumbering. Close when I leave for work. This in conjunction with locking your bedroom door should win any "what if " agurements. Smoking.50 is also correct. Teach them early and often these are not toys. The respect for firearms will tougher than any safe. Hope that helps....

They were married for a spell..

May the force be with her.

Sig and a Beretta. Not seeing that in your listed stable

I would have done the same thing if carrying.You were smert. It's not like we have " good guy" and " bad guy" arm bands with this type of active shooter scenario. People are right to be jumpy, we live in interesting times.