Jump to content
azmaveth

Federal judge deems cali’s AWB unconstitutional

Recommended Posts

This is totally expected.

The next thing will be for CA to appeal it to the 9th Circus and from recent example, the same anti-gun en banc panel will grab it and stay the ruling even though they will have to ignore their own assignment rules to do so.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Mr.Stu said:

This is totally expected.

The next thing will be for CA to appeal it to the 9th Circus and from recent example, the same anti-gun en banc panel will grab it and stay the ruling even though they will have to ignore their own assignment rules to do so.

They've already filed the appeal.

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/5381/attachments/original/1697748177/2023.10.19_176_NOA.pdf?1697748177

This is another step in the ping pong battle.  The lawsuit was originally filed back in 2019.  https://www.firearmspolicy.org/miller

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9th Circuit Court of Appeals is holding Oral Arguments in California's appeal of the Miller V. Bonta decision TODAY (Wed 1/24), scheduled for 2:00 PM Pacific/5:00 PM Eastern.  Should be interesting listening:

Invidious Links (youtube proxy without the ads and tracking):

https://yewtu.be/watch?v=M3gDBqEXc8I
https://vid.puffyan.us/watch?v=M3gDBqEXc8I

Youtube link (if you must):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3gDBqEXc8I
 

  • Informative 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, ESB said:

Can anyone give us the Cliff Notes of whats happening.  

Read wikipedia for the case background:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_v._Bonta#Legal_proceedings

Then, picking up where Wikipedia left off - Yesterday the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments from both the Plaintiffs ("The Good Guys who just want to not be infringed") and the Defendants (The State of California) on why the prior court's decision (that California is appealing) is right/wrong.

Edit - a little more color - the 9th Circuit is infamously biased anti-gun, and it will be interesting to see what contortions they go through to try to uphold California's AWB in the face of the SCOTUS Bruen decision.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My best guess is that this 3 judge panel will sit on this case until the en banc ruling on the other  (the mag ban) case in play there.

Welcome to the world that the assholes here in NJ helped create in '90, Commifornia and Illinois too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...