Chad 3 Posted August 26, 2009 Is this really a weapons cashe??? http://www.app.com/article/20090826/NEW ... +Twp.+home CLINTON Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lublin 3 Posted August 26, 2009 Yea, he really sounds like 1 man army. :roll: Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NJChiroDoc 0 Posted August 26, 2009 I think many of us have many more guns than this man. Further more what is with the handcuff charge? I guess all you kinky people better be on the watch for the police. Drugs dildos and handcuffs want is the world coming to? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wolfy 51 Posted August 26, 2009 Jeez how much more slanted can this story be? A 357 with a speed loader and 2 shotguns with PISTOL grips!!!! Run for the hills OMG the evil pistol grip. DA reporter. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Karatenurse 11 Posted August 26, 2009 other than discharge of a firearm in a residential area, If all the guns were on his property, I thought I read somewhere here that he did not need any FID to have guns at his home. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ronoverdrive 0 Posted August 26, 2009 I don't consider that a weapons cache in the least, but the big problem was that he couldn't produce his FPID. That's what put the nail in his coffin and most likely prompted a search of his home in the first place. other than discharge of a firearm in a residential area, If all the guns were on his property, I thought I read somewhere here that he did not need any FID to have guns at his home. Yes, but the article made it sound like he was discovered outside of his home with alcohol and a 22 rifle which may have been the case. If he moved to NJ and brought his guns its one thing, but if he's been a lifetime resident he's required a FPID to purchase even with out of state purchases. So if he's a lifetime NJ resident with guns and no FPID there's a good chance the guns were illegally acquired. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rscalzo 3 Posted August 26, 2009 other than discharge of a firearm in a residential area, If all the guns were on his property, I thought I read somewhere here that he did not need any FID to have guns at his home. One of the reasons you should know the law. That statute has nothing to do with how the owner came into possession of the firearm or weapon. It has everything to do with how that weapon was used. It is the same statute that covers any weapon. Is it the statute used when a cutting instrument is used. It goes towards how and not what is used in the crime. Standing outside your home drunk shooting a gun will get you noticed. http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/charge ... apons8.htm Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Malsua 1,422 Posted August 26, 2009 other than discharge of a firearm in a residential area, If all the guns were on his property, I thought I read somewhere here that he did not need any FID to have guns at his home. One of the reasons you should know the law. That statute has nothing to do with how the owner came into possession of the firearm or weapon. It has everything to do with how that weapon was used. It is the same statute that covers any weapon. Is it the statute used when a cutting instrument is used. It goes towards how and not what is used in the crime. Standing outside your home drunk shooting a gun will get you noticed. http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/charge ... apons8.htm How do you rectify this then: From your link: 1 Excepted from this Statute are machine guns, handguns, rifles and shotguns. (See N.J.S.A. 2C:39-5a to 5e.). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
coldsolderjoint 84 Posted August 26, 2009 other than discharge of a firearm in a residential area, If all the guns were on his property, I thought I read somewhere here that he did not need any FID to have guns at his home. One of the reasons you should know the law. That statute has nothing to do with how the owner came into possession of the firearm or weapon. It has everything to do with how that weapon was used. It is the same statute that covers any weapon. Is it the statute used when a cutting instrument is used. It goes towards how and not what is used in the crime. Standing outside your home drunk shooting a gun will get you noticed. http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/charge ... apons8.htm Is this just a bad case of reporting, or the police not 100% sure of the laws? What does not having his FPID Card have to do with this? I thought the FPID was only for purchase. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rscalzo 3 Posted August 26, 2009 When a weapon, any weapon is used in an illegal manner, this statute is used. The fact that it is a legal firearm, knife, bat, etc. has nothing to do with it. Standard charge in most cases. NJSA Title 13 deals with the requirement of a FID card, not title 2C. The Disorderly Conduct was the use of it while intoxicated. Discharge ordinances for the most part at set town by town. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
coldsolderjoint 84 Posted August 26, 2009 When a weapon, any weapon is used in an illegal manner, this statute is used. The fact that it is a legal firearm, knife, bat, etc. has nothing to do with it. Standard charge in most cases. NJSA Title 13 deals with the requirement of a FID card, not title 2C. The Disorderly Conduct was the use of it while intoxicated. Discharge ordinances for the most part at set town by town. That's what I'm asking about.. the article said: When Guadagno could not produce a firearms identification card, officers arrested him on charges of unlawful weapons possession, possession of handcuffs and disorderly conduct, police said. According to the law you posted, even if he did have a FPID, it would still be irrelevant because the weapon was used in an unlawful manner. No? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rscalzo 3 Posted August 26, 2009 Yes, that is the way the law is applied. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fishpaw 17 Posted August 26, 2009 Also, in NJ, handcuffs and brass knuckles are prohibited...so thats also part of the problem...probably the gravity knife as well... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianargent 7 Posted August 26, 2009 I giggle inside when I see the (toy, presumably) handcuffs on a hanging rack at the local A&P, because of the ban. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrMcKulit 0 Posted August 26, 2009 Whaaat? Handcuffs are illegal? They would have to take that away from my wife LOL But seriously though ... handcuffs? I didn't know that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianargent 7 Posted August 26, 2009 From the New Jersey Code, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ray Ray 3,566 Posted August 27, 2009 What is a gravity knife? That's a new one to me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matt6669 71 Posted August 27, 2009 What is a gravity knife? That's a new one to me. Any knife that can be opened by the force of gravity. Aka if you can flick your wrist and the blade folds out, its considered a gravity knife. Make sure you don't have one of those babies in NYC otherwise your in HUGE trouble. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ianargent 7 Posted August 27, 2009 a form of switchblade where the action of gravity extends the blade when you press a button; I believe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity_knife - "A gravity knife is a knife that opens by the force of inertia or gravity." Note that the ban on various funky equipment is only if posessed "without any explainable lawful purpose". I love the weasel-words in the NJ weapon statutes, don't you? (NJ code 2C:39-3 e). Illegal to make or sell under any circumstanced, though Incidentally - NJ definition e. Certain weapons. Any person who knowingly has in his possession any gravity knife, switchblade knife, dagger, dirk, stiletto, billy, blackjack, metal knuckle, sandclub, slingshot, cestus or similar leather band studded with metal filings or razor blades imbedded in wood, ballistic knife, without any explainable lawful purpose, is guilty of a crime of the fourth degree. - 2C:39-1 h. "Gravity knife" means any knife which has a blade which is released from the handle or sheath thereof by the force of gravity or the application of centrifugal force... p. "Switchblade knife" means any knife or similar device which has blade which opens automatically by hand pressure applied to a button, spring or other device in the handle of the knife... u. "Ballistic knife" means any weapon or other device capable of lethal use and which can propel a knife blade. (Found via google and Wikipedia) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites