Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Recommended Posts

After looking for a while trying to figure out what grains do what (lower grains to higher grains with their relative results), and coming up with about 30 different histories of what a grain is, and not what it actually translates to in use, I ask you.

 

What is the difference between the grains besides bullet weight? Someone told me the higher the grain the less recoil and more power? BTW Im looking for info on 9mm and not rifle rounds, so keep that in mind as I dont think Ill be shoot much more than 25 yards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah.... grains is a measure used.

 

When it comes to rounds, not bullets, so lets get that out of the way too. A round, is the term for the complete cartridge that goes inside the gun. Consisting of the bullet(projectile), sitting atop of gun powder, inside a brass case(or aluminum), with a primer at the bottom.

 

Grains can be used to discuss both, the projectile weight, and the amount of gun powder. Typically, reloaders talk grains of powder. =P

 

The bullets themselves, for 9mm, are going to be 115gr, or 124gr. typically, the lighter bullet will be shot at a faster rate, however a heavier bullet is preferred for longer distances as easier to stabilize.

 

For recoil, most people typically would load less powder, ie, grains, but for factory loads, you dont have a choice.

 

Hope that makes sense.

 

Just go shoot them, and see what makes a difference.

 

Most 9mm ammo you are going to buy, Winchester white box, Remington UMC green box, PMC, are going to be 115gr, and shoot about the same, recoil wise. You have some 124gr home defense rounds, ie Speer Gold Dots, that are 124gr Jacketed Hollow points, that are a little bit hotter(more powder), that will kick a bit more, but shoot at higher energy, ie, knockdown power.

 

For shooting at 25 yards though, wont mean anything practical.

 

Only when you start shooting past 100 yards will that translate into stuff you ought to care for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm I just picked up a few rounds of American Truncated, 147 grain. I know this means more kinetic energy, but is the recoil difference noticeably stronger or weaker than a 115? Logic is telling me its stronger, but ive heard otherwise.

 

Also, thanks for your fast as replies, some of the fastest Ive seen on any forum

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmm I just picked up a few rounds of American Truncated, 147 grain. I know this means more kinetic energy, but is the recoil difference noticeably stronger or weaker than a 115? Logic is telling me its stronger, but ive heard otherwise.

 

Also, thanks for your fast as replies, some of the fastest Ive seen on any forum

 

I was shooting my G19 with a few different kinds of ammo. white box 115 FMJ and Winchester Ranger T-Series 9mm 147gr JHP +P and I mixed up the bullets when I was loading the magazine to see if I could feel the difference. From my experience with that I could feel the 147gr felt more powerful in general and it seemed like the slide would kick back faster than with the 147gr.

 

I asked a question on this site earlier about shooting +P ammo usually 147gr through glocks because I read about the glock "kaboom" and didn't want to risk it. Someone suggested that I move up to a bigger caliber for the desired effect and I think thats the best choice. Although I called Glock and and spoke with someone who said its not a problem shooting +P ammo through them I didn't feel like the Glock was handling the +P 147 gr as well as it should have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmm I just picked up a few rounds of American Truncated, 147 grain. I know this means more kinetic energy, but is the recoil difference noticeably stronger or weaker than a 115? Logic is telling me its stronger, but ive heard otherwise.

 

Also, thanks for your fast as replies, some of the fastest Ive seen on any forum

 

I was shooting my G19 with a few different kinds of ammo. white box 115 FMJ and Winchester Ranger T-Series 9mm 147gr JHP +P and I mixed up the bullets when I was loading the magazine to see if I could feel the difference. From my experience with that I could feel the 147gr felt more powerful in general and it seemed like the slide would kick back faster than with the 147gr.

 

I asked a question on this site earlier about shooting +P ammo usually 147gr through glocks because I read about the glock "kaboom" and didn't want to risk it. Someone suggested that I move up to a bigger caliber for the desired effect and I think thats the best choice. Although I called Glock and and spoke with someone who said its not a problem shooting +P ammo through them I didn't feel like the Glock was handling the +P 147 gr as well as it should have.

 

Please explain what I put in red.

For defense +P is just fine in your GLOCK. Many LEO use them and GLOCK stands behind +P use. Internet babble is just that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For every action, there is an opposite and equal reaction. Heavier bullets do not necessarily mean heavier recoil. A light bullet generally garners higher velocity, a heavy one lower - but recoil energy is mass x velocity so you can't categorically state that a heavier bullet will have more recoil.

 

As was pointed out, the bullet weight has little to do with stabilization except for how it relates to the twist rate of firearm it is being shot from. Heavier bullets require faster twist rates to stabilize.

 

Heavier bullets will retain their velocity further down range (momentum).

 

7000 grains = 1.0 pound

 

Adios,

 

Pizza Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Pizza Bob gave a more complete answer than I regarding weight and stability. What I meant was that weight doesnt cause one round to be stable and another to be unstable. Length and weight are key determining elemants on what twist rate it takes to stabalise the projo. Here is the answer I got from an honest to goodness actual Ballisticiana few years back:

 

Shane,

Both the bullets weight and length are important factors in stability. Since they usually go hand in hand, the distinction isn't obvious, but they're both important.

A long light bullet is the worst case scenario and requires the fastest twist. A short heavy bullet doesn't need much spin at all.

If you're interested in a program that calculates bullet stability, send me an email and I'll reply with the program attached.

 

Take care,

-Bryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmm I just picked up a few rounds of American Truncated, 147 grain. I know this means more kinetic energy, but is the recoil difference noticeably stronger or weaker than a 115? Logic is telling me its stronger, but ive heard otherwise.

 

Also, thanks for your fast as replies, some of the fastest Ive seen on any forum

 

I was shooting my G19 with a few different kinds of ammo. white box 115 FMJ and Winchester Ranger T-Series 9mm 147gr JHP +P and I mixed up the bullets when I was loading the magazine to see if I could feel the difference. From my experience with that I could feel the 147gr felt more powerful in general and it seemed like the slide would kick back faster than with the 147gr.

 

I asked a question on this site earlier about shooting +P ammo usually 147gr through glocks because I read about the glock "kaboom" and didn't want to risk it. Someone suggested that I move up to a bigger caliber for the desired effect and I think thats the best choice. Although I called Glock and and spoke with someone who said its not a problem shooting +P ammo through them I didn't feel like the Glock was handling the +P 147 gr as well as it should have.

 

Please explain what I put in red.

For defense +P is just fine in your GLOCK. Many LEO use them and GLOCK stands behind +P use. Internet babble is just that!

 

typo, should be:

"From my experience with that I could feel the 147gr felt more powerful in general and it seemed like the slide would kick back faster than with the 115gr"

 

I know its approved to handle the +P 147 grain but I just felt as though the gun wasn't meant to handle the extra pressure. When the slide slammed back it just felt like there was too much pressure, or it could just be me accustomed to shooting with the 115gr. Thats just my 2cents. In any case I am waiting to step up to a .45.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • We never let then inside.  Last re-evaluation was 6-7 years ago, wife politely told him that he was welcome to look around the property and he could look in the windows. He saw two white resin chairs in the basement and told her that this constituted a finished basement. And everything in the basement is bare concrete/ cinder block, and mechanical systems. Nothing finished about it. Ultimately he relented and I'm sure that was a ploy to coerce us to allow him in
    • I use an Alien Gear cloak tuck (IWB) with my Shield.  Neoprene back - in the summer it does feel warm but doesn't rub or chafe.   https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-iwb-holster.html Could also go with the shapeshift as it has multiple options - OWB/IWB, Appendix... https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-shapeshift-modular-holster-system.html
    • The  12-1 compression ratio L88 is long gone. This is GM's updated version. it might be  pump gas 10-1 engine The L88 was a aluminum head  cast iron block engine with a nasty solid lifter cam. the  ZL1 was a all aluminum  12 or 13-1 compression ratio engine with the best forged internal parts at the time and had a even nastier solid lifter cam 
    • I like my regular carry holster.  OWB leather with belt slots.  I've been carrying for over a year and it was comfortable and I hardly even noticed it.  I carry (usually) a Ruger LCP .380 - light, convenient, tiny. But...today I ended up taking it off an leaving it home after a few hours. I cut down a big maple tree a few days ago and I spent 3/4 of today loading and unloading firewood into the back of my truck and a trailer.  It was a warm day, I was dirty, tired, sweaty, and my holster was rubbing against my side.  The leather and exposed metal snap was no longer comfortable. I'm thinking about adding a layer of something to that part of the holster to soften the contact.  Anything insulating will make it worse.  I don't want a sweaty, hotter holster against my skin.  I'm imagining something thin, breathable, that won't absorb sweat, and softer than leather, metal snaps, and rivets.   But I have no idea what would work. I'm hoping somebody else has already figured this out and I can just do what they did. Any suggestions appreciated.
    • Check the primers on the ammo you didn't shoot yet. Are they fully seated? If the primer is not just below flush with the back of the case, the first hit can seat it better then the second hit ignites it. 
×
×
  • Create New...