njpilot 671 Posted January 23, 2012 Unanimous decision, protecting the 4th Amendment. Police need a warrant to put a GPS tracking device on cars. http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/story/2012-01-23/supreme-court-GPS/52754354/1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Malsua 1,422 Posted January 23, 2012 Yup, good ruling. There have been any number of cases where law enforcement went ahead and put GPS trackers on vehicles without warrants. Now the law is clear. Not without a warrant and only within the stated restrictions of the warrant otherwise it is an illegal search. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
notmetoo 41 Posted January 23, 2012 Excellent news! Too much ground has been given up when it comes to our liberty and freedom. This at least sets a boundary in one small area. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GiantsFan 22 Posted January 23, 2012 One for the good guys! (Those who believe in the U.S. Constitution) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NJdiverTony 27 Posted January 23, 2012 Good news.. but who's to say that LE won't still unlawfully use GPS tracking, and just make sure to NOT use it as evidence in court? They would still be able to bust someone, but not mention how they did it or make up another story. Don't get me wrong, if bad guys get busted... I won't be shedding any tears... but if good citizens are busted via a crappy investigation and false charges... then that's bad! I didn't read the whole story on this... but was the BG in this story able to go free after the ruling? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GiantsFan 22 Posted January 23, 2012 Good news.. but who's to say that LE won't still unlawfully use GPS tracking, and just make sure to NOT use it as evidence in court? They would still be able to bust someone, but not mention how they did it or make up another story. Don't get me wrong, if bad guys get busted... I won't be shedding any tears... but if good citizens are busted via a crappy investigation and false charges... then that's bad! I didn't read the whole story on this... but was the BG in this story able to go free after the ruling? Whoaaa!! LEOs breaking the law?? Say it ain't so Joe! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NicePants 58 Posted January 23, 2012 Was it a 5-4 decision again? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
raz-0 1,259 Posted January 23, 2012 Was it a 5-4 decision again? Wow, can't be bothered to read the first sentence of the post? 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hd2000fxdl 422 Posted January 23, 2012 Was it a 5-4 decision again? , not that none of us have done something similar. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NicePants 58 Posted January 23, 2012 LOL. D'oh! I have to stop skimming. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpacemanFry 51 Posted January 23, 2012 Yea really glad with is ruling. Hope to see more like it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KpdPipes 388 Posted January 24, 2012 Good news.. but who's to say that LE won't still unlawfully use GPS tracking, and just make sure to NOT use it as evidence in court? They would still be able to bust someone, but not mention how they did it or make up another story. Don't get me wrong, if bad guys get busted... I won't be shedding any tears... but if good citizens are busted via a crappy investigation and false charges... then that's bad! I didn't read the whole story on this... but was the BG in this story able to go free after the ruling? it would still have to be documented, and available for discovery......this is really more of a Fed thing anyway..despite what you see on CSI, NCIS, and other TV shows, your average PD has neither the access or the budget to use that stuff. Oh and for the record, I'm glad they ruled this way. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Qel Hoth 33 Posted January 24, 2012 Good news.. but who's to say that LE won't still unlawfully use GPS tracking, and just make sure to NOT use it as evidence in court? They would still be able to bust someone, but not mention how they did it or make up another story. Don't get me wrong, if bad guys get busted... I won't be shedding any tears... but if good citizens are busted via a crappy investigation and false charges... then that's bad! I didn't read the whole story on this... but was the BG in this story able to go free after the ruling? Not only can it not be used it court, any evidence that is even remotely related to the GPS data wouldn't be admissible either. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites