Jump to content
ChrisJM981

NJ Senate bills proposed for 2012-2013 Legislative Session

Recommended Posts

After looking through all the bills in the Senate Law and Public Safety I compiled a list of proposed bills for the 2012-2013 Legislative Session that affect firearm owners in NJ. I believe all are just renumbered for the new Legislative Session.

 

Support:

 

S104 Revises procedures for securing a permit to carry a handgun.

Law and Public Safety

http://www.njleg.sta...0500/104_I1.PDF

 

Cardinale, Gerald as Primary Sponsor

Oroho, Steven V. as Primary Sponsor

Bucco, Anthony R. as Co-Sponsor

1/10/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

 

 

S269 Revises procedures for securing a permit to carry a handgun.

http://www.njleg.sta...0500/269_I1.PDF

 

Doherty, Michael J. as Primary Sponsor

O'Toole, Kevin J. as Primary Sponsor

Oroho, Steven V. as Co-Sponsor

Bucco, Anthony R. as Co-Sponsor

1/10/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

 

 

S707 The "New Jersey Right to Home Defense Law."

http://www.njleg.sta...1000/707_I1.PDF

 

O'Toole, Kevin J. as Primary Sponsor

Bucco, Anthony R. as Co-Sponsor

1/10/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

 

 

S1627 Eliminates prohibition against purchasing more than one handgun in calendar month.

http://www.njleg.sta...000/1627_I1.PDF

 

Oroho, Steven V. as Primary Sponsor

Doherty, Michael J. as Co-Sponsor

2/16/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

 

 

S1737 Provides two-year window for persons to transfer, render inoperable or surrender assault firearm.

http://www.njleg.sta...000/1737_I1.PDF

 

Bucco, Anthony R. as Primary Sponsor

3/5/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

 

 

Fight:

 

S419 Revises qualifications and requirements for permits to carry handgun; establishes annual fee of $100.

Law and Public Safety

http://www.njleg.sta...0500/419_I1.PDF

 

Van Drew, Jeff as Primary Sponsor

1/10/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

 

 

S657 Requires proof of firearms safety training as a condition for issuance of firearms purchaser ID cards and permits to purchase handguns.

http://www.njleg.sta...1000/657_I1.PDF

 

Stack, Brian P. as Primary Sponsor

Cunningham, Sandra B. as Primary Sponsor

1/10/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

 

 

S810 Clarifies that "airsoft" guns are firearms

http://www.njleg.sta...1000/810_I1.PDF

 

Smith, Bob as Primary Sponsor

Scutari, Nicholas P. as Co-Sponsor

1/10/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

 

S1278 Establishes "gun-free" and "weapon free" zones around certain school and public properties.

http://www.njleg.sta...500/1278_I1.PDF

 

Turner, Shirley K. as Primary Sponsor

1/30/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

 

 

S1705 Permits municipalities to establish weapons free zones around schools and public facilities

http://www.njleg.sta...000/1705_I1.PDF

 

Rice, Ronald L. as Primary Sponsor

2/27/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

 

 

S2178 Revises definition of destructive device to include certain weapons of 50 caliber or greater

http://www.njleg.sta...500/2178_I1.PDF

 

Lesniak, Raymond J. as Primary Sponsor

9/20/2012 Introduced in the Senate, Referred to Senate Law and Public Safety Committee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What does s1737 mean. Doesn't make sense to me

 

It means that if you have a firearm that falls under NJ's AWB of the early 90's, you get a chance to unload it free and clear within a window of two years.

 

It seems to me that if you currently own NJ compliant semi auto's, this bill means diddly squat.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

It means that if you have a firearm that falls under NJ's AWB of the early 90's, you get a chance to unload it free and clear within a window of two years.

 

It seems to me that if you currently own NJ compliant semi auto's, this bill means diddly squat.

 

It's good if you, say inherit some firearms while cleaning out a parent's home that you didn't know they possessed. Doesn't apply to me personally, but I'm sure it happens.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think 1737 is meant to as a safety valve for gun owners should currently legal weapons be reclassified as assault weapons, and be subject to confiscation. Personally I'd just lawfully transport them to a lockup in another state.

 

That's sneaky......

 

.....but since NJ is not a NFA State, then this would make sense........from the State's point of view anyway.

 

But here's the problem, since NJ is not an NFA State, there is no way to 'legally and lawfully' transport them for lockup in another state....in that other state, said gun would be illegal.

 

Easiest thing to do would be to remove the bolt, and give it to a family member for safe keeping.........

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read the first (S104) right to carry bill. Anyone who has read through all of the carry bills, what is the difference in the language between them. If no one has, I will try to read them tonight, but I have to admit, I am no lawyer, just a computer geek with an opinion :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, after doing my own research, the only difference I can find is that S104 is good for 2 years after issuance, with renewal every 2 years where S269 is good for 5 years.

 

Either way, AWESOME! Maybe I should get a roll of stamps tomorrow :D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, after doing my own research, the only difference I can find is that S104 is good for 2 years after issuance, with renewal every 2 years where S269 is good for 5 years.

 

Either way, AWESOME! Maybe I should get a roll of stamps tomorrow :D.

 

S104 is amended to be for 5 years instead of just 2. If it's in [brackets] it's a proposed deletion, whereas if it's underlined it is a proposed addition to the statute.

 

All permits to carry handguns shall expire [2] 5 years from the

22 date of issuance [or, in the case of an employee of an armored car

23 company, upon termination of his employment by the company

24 occurring prior thereto whichever is earlier in time,] and they may

25 thereafter be renewed every [2] 5 years in the same manner and

26 subject to the same conditions as in the case of original

27 applications.

 

It appears S104 refers to the bill as "Citizens' Protection and Crime Reduction Act of

2004,"

 

S269 just refers to it as "Citizens' Protection and Crime Reduction Act"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh sorry about that. I got my punctuation wrong :huh:

 

Next question, how often do these ccw laws come up in Senate or Assembly? Is this an annual thing, or a new development?

 

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait did I read that they want to make airsoft toys a firearm? I hope none of your kids have plastic bb hollowpoints

 

That's exactly what it says. You'd need a FPID to buy a rifle, and Pistol Purchase Permit for a handgun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Similar Content

    • By 124gr9mm
      Received this last night.
      Sent a message to all the contact names on the list they provided at the link:
       
       HONEST GUN OWNERS TREATED
      THE SAME AS MURDERERS FOR
      INADVERTENT, TECHNICAL LAW VIOLATIONS   No Violent Crime Required Rot in Jail for Years While Awaiting “Trial”
      Tell Lawmakers to Fix or Oppose This Poorly-Crafted Bill
      On Monday, March 14 at 1:00 p.m., the New Jersey Assembly Law and Public Safety Committee is scheduled to consider A2426 – an apparently well-intentioned but badly botched piece of legislation whose intended purpose appears to be to throw the book at violent gun criminals – which law-abiding gun owners actually support.
        But as written, the bill does not distinguish between violent criminal behavior and innocent technical infractions for the draconian presumption against bail to apply.  Law-abiding gun owners who inadvertently violate NJ’s thicket of hyper-technical firearms possession laws would be treated exactly the same as murderers—thrown in jail to rot for years without bail while they await trial someday for their “crimes.”
      This is not an imagined concern, as the Garden State has a well-documented track record of throwing the book at honest gun owners for innocent technical infractions.  As written, this bill adds insult to injury and would throw honest gun owners in the gulag for years while they await trial for “infractions” like:
      -Stopping for food, fuel, going to the bathroom, or medical treatment on the way to or from the target range.
      -Transporting firearms to or from one’s place of business, a gun store, hunting, fishing, target shooting competitions, target ranges, re-enactments, gun buyback events, vacation homes or other destinations.
      -Widows or widowers turning in firearms of their deceased spouses.
      -Possession of antique and black powder firearms (even these firearms could trigger the draconian penalties under this bill).
      PLEASE IMMEDIATELY CLICK HERE TO EMAIL EVERY ASSEMBLY MEMBER AND TELL THEM TO EITHER FIX OR OPPOSE A2426.  The law should distinguish between MERE POSSESSION of firearms by honest gun owners, vs. MISUSE of firearms by violent gun criminals, and draconian penalties like presumptive denial of bail should only apply to violent criminals who misuse firearms, and not to innocent mistakes of honest gun owners like technical possessory infractions where no violent misconduct is present.  Honest gun owners should not be treated the same as murderers!  Throw the book at the bad guys but take extreme care not to lump the good guys in with the bad.  The bill can easily be amended to make it clear that its penalties apply only to persons accused of violent criminal behavior.
       
       
    • By Franklin Armory
      Franklin Armory® is pleased to announce that the RS7™ Reformation™ and the RS11™ Reformation™ will be made available for sale to residents of New Jersey in the near future.  Both the RS7™ and RS11™ feature our patent pending barrel technology with straight cut lands and grooves that separates and distinguishes our Reformation™ branded firearms from standard rifled firearms and smooth bore firearms that are not equipped with our Reformation™ technology.  Franklin Armory® has been working with New Jersey law enforcement to ensure that the Reformation™ branded products are classified properly by state and local law enforcement.  Reformation™ branded firearms.  In anticipation of the release, Franklin Armory® will be accepting reservations for the RS7™ Reformation™ and the RS11™ Reformation™.
      Additional information on the Reformation™ firearm can be found on http://www.reformationfirearms.com/
    • By My1stGlock
      Does anyone know if this is legal according to Jersey gun laws? Has anybody done this? The intention is to transport to and from my range. Any input from any law enforcement? What about interstate? Just curious as my hatchback is really tight and wanted to know what other options are there. The cargo top would be locked. 
    • By Michael1776
      Michael J. Cino is the Chairman of the Constitutional Carry Coalition - we believe that "justifiable need" should be trashed - Please CALL TEN PEOPLE you know in the 5th Congressional District and ASK THEM TO VOTE FOR MICHAEL J. CINO IN THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY JUNE 7 AgainstTheEstablishment.com
      Then ask them to CALL TEN PEOPLE THEMSELVES

      and then ask those TEN to call TEN PEOPLE to Vote for Michael J. Cino in the 5th Congressional District on June 7 - it's the only way we are going to get rid of "justifiable need" and change the gun laws in New Jersey AgainstTheEstablishment.com
    • By Stonecoldchavez
      http://www.burlingtoncountytimes.com/news/local/christie-says-nj-gun-laws-overreaching-offered-pardon-in-mount/article_e387207a-e25d-11e5-8f0a-ab455d0934dc.html
       
      Article in today's Burlington County Times saying that Brian Aitken declined Christie's attempt to pardon him for the hollow point bullets charges he received.
       
      I am a little confused by the article because it says he denied the pardon because he wants to appeal the charges. But at the end of the article it says he has exhausted all his appeals.
       
      "Aitken, who has moved out of New Jersey, has written a book about his ordeal and the case's lasting impact, claiming on social media that a Family Court judge has refused to grant him visitation rights with his son because of his conviction. He has exhausted all his appeals."
       
      So which is it?
       
      I agree with Brian on appealing the charges. If he takes the pardon, the draconian gun laws "go away" until the next person is arrested.
       
       
       
       
  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...