Jump to content
Shane45

Yet another rifle in 6.5 Creedmoor

Recommended Posts

This is what 6.5 CM was meant for, to be coming out of a box fed mag.

It is definitely not boutique anymore but that would be because of its adoption in bolt guns... NOT semi autos. =P  

It's simply better ballistics with a good amount of people behind it.  Should certainly be safe for the next decade or so.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point being Bolts, adopted long ago, the fringe just finally figuring it out, or not (Ray Ray). Semi's, adoption achieved. Full Auto, belt fed meaning it has infiltrated every corner of 308'dom.

RR, FN dont prototype shit unless theres money behind it in a big way...as in someone is asking for it.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's only taken the 6.5 Creedmoor 12 years to become an overnight sensation. :p

Its sharp shoulder would negate me from picking it as my first choice for a magazine fed semi-auto, but it does have good downrange ballistics. In a belt-fed auto I guess this will work fine. Seems they forgot all about the .260 Remington, which is a great short-action .264" round. Surprised the .243 Win. didn't get the nod for a short-action something from the military. And whatever happened to the 6.8 SPC? 

.264 anything's have always been great rounds downrange. What are there now, 13 commercially loaded 6.5-something's excluding wildcats? 

The 6.5 Creedmoor is a great example of laser-focused marketing, good factory ammo at a reasonable price and resources at the right time. Time to throw all those flat-shooting .243's, .257's, .277's and .284's in the trash, the .6.5 is here!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Parker, I agree with most of what your saying. I always believed that rem missed the boat big time by not making 260 match ammo readily available for the market that was clearly trending that way. I have a strong certainty that they were advised as such but didn't listen. 6.5 cm proved that was a big mistake on their part. But I would guess that 6.5 would be picked over 260 now because they want caliber commonality.  Some units have KAC's in 6.5, SOCOM officially adopted 6.5, and mil has always valued cal cominality. Just a theory.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Commonality makes sense. I think they'll have a winner with this one. 

It makes sense, the .308 is so 1952. :icon_e_biggrin:

As for the 6.5 Creedmoor, it's created more meme's on the internet than any other cartridge around.

 

 

 

IMG_3097.JPG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I use an Alien Gear cloak tuck (IWB) with my Shield.  Neoprene back - in the summer it does feel warm but doesn't rub or chafe.   https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-iwb-holster.html Could also go with the shapeshift as it has multiple options - OWB/IWB, Appendix... https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-shapeshift-modular-holster-system.html
    • The  12-1 compression ratio L88 is long gone. This is GM's updated version. it might be  pump gas 10-1 engine The L88 was a aluminum head  cast iron block engine with a nasty solid lifter cam. the  ZL1 was a all aluminum  12 or 13-1 compression ratio engine with the best forged internal parts at the time and had a even nastier solid lifter cam 
    • I like my regular carry holster.  OWB leather with belt slots.  I've been carrying for over a year and it was comfortable and I hardly even noticed it.  I carry (usually) a Ruger LCP .380 - light, convenient, tiny. But...today I ended up taking it off an leaving it home after a few hours. I cut down a big maple tree a few days ago and I spent 3/4 of today loading and unloading firewood into the back of my truck and a trailer.  It was a warm day, I was dirty, tired, sweaty, and my holster was rubbing against my side.  The leather and exposed metal snap was no longer comfortable. I'm thinking about adding a layer of something to that part of the holster to soften the contact.  Anything insulating will make it worse.  I don't want a sweaty, hotter holster against my skin.  I'm imagining something thin, breathable, that won't absorb sweat, and softer than leather, metal snaps, and rivets.   But I have no idea what would work. I'm hoping somebody else has already figured this out and I can just do what they did. Any suggestions appreciated.
    • Check the primers on the ammo you didn't shoot yet. Are they fully seated? If the primer is not just below flush with the back of the case, the first hit can seat it better then the second hit ignites it. 
    • And, charging your car at home? We've got you covered! California braces for new electric plan: Make more, pay more | Fox Business
×
×
  • Create New...