Jump to content
124gr9mm

Anyone submit the "additional handguns" form for your carry permit?

Recommended Posts

For anyone who received an early permit with a court order limiting you to the pistol(s) on your permit, has anyone filled out and submitted the new form for 'additional handguns':

https://www.nj.gov/njsp/firearms/pdf/sp-182a_PTC_Additional_Handguns_Intended_to_be_Carried.pdf

I'll wait to see if there are any changes that come from the upcoming court sessions, but I'm planning to hand it in to my PD along with my qual sheet before the October deadline (presuming that doesn't change).

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I submitted it plus the new quals to the court and was told to give it to the local police. 
I went to the police and they told me to give it to the court. The detective finally accepted them and put them in my “file”. So who knows. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, Golf battery said:

I handed mine into local pd. They checked with state police.  I was told as long i am up to date and following the current laws i can carry whatever i want to add the the form.  Basically put the onus on me

I'm not a lawyer but ...  As I interpret the law, you can carry any handgun that you own - full stop.

I don't see in the law, where I'm required to submit the form. If I missed that line, somebody please correct me.  It says the police have to collect the form.  If the police refuse to accept the form, they're breaking the law.   But I don't see any requirement for the permit holder to submit the form.    Unless I missed it, this part of the new law only instructs the police departments of a new responsibility that they now have to accept a form.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, maintenanceguy said:

I'm not a lawyer but ...  As I interpret the law, you can carry any handgun that you own - full stop.

I don't see in the law, where I'm required to submit the form. If I missed that line, somebody please correct me.  It says the police have to collect the form.  If the police refuse to accept the form, they're breaking the law.   But I don't see any requirement for the permit holder to submit the form.    Unless I missed it, this part of the new law only instructs the police departments of a new responsibility that they now have to accept a form.

There are a lot of people (myself included) who received early permits from the court where we were limited to the guns listed on a court order (to be carried with the permit).  This form is the way for us to carry more than what's in the court order (since the courts now refuse to amend the order because ccw is now 'responsibility of the local PD). 

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, 124gr9mm said:

There are a lot of people (myself included) who received early permits from the court where we were limited to the guns listed on a court order (to be carried with the permit).  This form is the way for us to carry more than what's in the court order (since the courts now refuse to amend the order because ccw is now 'responsibility of the local PD). 

got it.  I didn't realize it really wasn't intended for the rest of us.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/18/2023 at 1:28 PM, 124gr9mm said:

There are a lot of people (myself included) who received early permits from the court where we were limited to the guns listed on a court order (to be carried with the permit).  This form is the way for us to carry more than what's in the court order (since the courts now refuse to amend the order because ccw is now 'responsibility of the local PD). 

From my understanding you would need to be issued a new permit. As the court order is a binding legal document I believe only a judge of the sane court can amend.  I could be wrong though

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Vdep217 said:

From my understanding you would need to be issued a new permit. As the court order is a binding legal document I believe only a judge of the sane court can amend.  I could be wrong though

Yeah, it's an interesting conundrum.  Court order limits you to pistols on the app AND provides instructions for adding additional guns.  Unfortunately the court refuses to abide by those instructions and states that they're 'out of it' and they refer all permit related issues to local PD.

Local PD will not re-issue permits and require the full process again (including all costs associated) if you want a new one.

The law says one permit covers all guns, and the new form from NJSP is specific to additional handguns for permits, so that's what i delivered to my PD.  My PD accepted it as such.

In the unlikely event that I'm questioned about it I'll let the chips fall where they may.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, 124gr9mm said:

Yeah, it's an interesting conundrum.  Court order limits you to pistols on the app AND provides instructions for adding additional guns.  Unfortunately the court refuses to abide by those instructions and states that they're 'out of it' and they refer all permit related issues to local PD.

Local PD will not re-issue permits and require the full process again (including all costs associated) if you want a new one.

The law says one permit covers all guns, and the new form from NJSP is specific to additional handguns for permits, so that's what i delivered to my PD.  My PD accepted it as such.

In the unlikely event that I'm questioned about it I'll let the chips fall where they may.

 

I've been stpped 3 times a disclosed I was carrying not once did they ever ask to see fore arm and only 1 officer asked to see permit

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I feel the additional gun thing on paper will be a thing when God forbid , you use the firearm in self defense. Maybe not so much a criminal issue but the ambulance chasing lawyer will make it seem like the end of the world to jury, in the civil case that will surely follow. Chances are small but not worth the trouble if you didnt qualify with the additional guns and just wrote it in. This applies to guys that just add the guns in on paper after the fact (qualification).

Example retired LE, we qual 2 times a year.  The carry gun I qual with is written down, on the qual sheet, and there is space to write more in, underneath it. Its tempting to add a few more in, when you leave the range. Just an opinion. The reason this would be a thing is retired LE is allowed to carry and keep15 round mags, in every gun they qualify with.

The smart instructors cross a line through the additional gun part, but some don't.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 70gto said:

I feel the additional gun thing on paper will be a thing when God forbid , you use the firearm in self defense. Maybe not so much a criminal issue but the ambulance chasing lawyer will make it seem like the end of the world to jury, in the civil case that will surely follow. Chances are small but not worth the trouble if you didnt qualify with the additional guns and just wrote it in. This applies to guys that just add the guns in on paper after the fact (qualification).

Example retired LE, we qual 2 times a year.  The carry gun I qual with is written down, on the qual sheet, and there is space to write more in, underneath it. Its tempting to add a few more in, when you leave the range. Just an opinion. The reason this would be a thing is retired LE is allowed to carry and keep15 round mags, in every gun they qualify with.

The smart instructors cross a line through the additional gun part, but some don't.

I think there's zero chance it becomes an issue.  The law and the form for additional guns are explicit that "One permit shall be sufficient for all handguns..."

I appreciate that retired LEO may currently have  a different standard, but for those of us who are not, there's little ambiguity.

 

1859317663_8-25-20233-12-39PM.png.59a961a3271adcf93be39532677338a0.png

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vdep217 nailed it in my opinion.

The thing that saves us is that one permit covers all guns you own, except that you have to submit a form listing the guns you own, except the courts limited the guns you can carry, except that the court removed itself from the process that they put in place to add additional guns to the permit.

So many contradictions that I think the state's prosecutors are in a weaker position then if the law was never passed.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 2
  • Informative 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 124gr9mm said:

I think there's zero chance it becomes an issue.  The law and the form for additional guns are explicit that "One permit shall be sufficient for all handguns..."

I appreciate that retired LEO may currently have  a different standard, but for those of us who are not, there's little ambiguity.

 

1859317663_8-25-20233-12-39PM.png.59a961a3271adcf93be39532677338a0.png

If you have a court order you are bound by the order

  • Agree 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Vdep217 said:

If you have a court order you are bound by the order

Indeed.

When contacting the court (as directed by the order) to add additional guns they have directed me to the local PD.  I expressed concern to the court that they were not allowing me to follow the direction of their order, but they advised that they were 'out of it' and directed me to local PD. 

Local PD directs me to the form.

If the court isn't concerned about it and my POD isn't concerned about it, neither am I.  I'm done walking on eggshells.  I've paid plenty and have followed all of the laws.

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My court order states I may carry the guns listed. It does not say I can carry ONLY the guns listed. 

It also says that to add guns I only need to write to the court with the details of the new guns and provide proof of qualifying. It does not say the court will amend the CO. The fact that the court has been ordered not to amend my court order is irrelevant. I have completed the steps required by the court order. 

  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Mr.Stu said:

My court order states I may carry the guns listed. It does not say I can carry ONLY the guns listed. 

It also says that to add guns I only need to write to the court with the details of the new guns and provide proof of qualifying. It does not say the court will amend the CO. The fact that the court has been ordered not to amend my court order is irrelevant. I have completed the steps required by the court order. 

What box or boxes are checked on your permit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/25/2023 at 10:00 PM, Mr.Stu said:

My court order states I may carry the guns listed. It does not say I can carry ONLY the guns listed. 

It also says that to add guns I only need to write to the court with the details of the new guns and provide proof of qualifying. It does not say the court will amend the CO. The fact that the court has been ordered not to amend my court order is irrelevant. I have completed the steps required by the court order. 

Mine has the guns listed that I qualified with and submitted to the court.  It also says that imay ammend the court order to include additional handguns by submitting quals for them.  

It also says that I must also adhere to any statute or regulations.  

So NJ Staute 2C:58-4a says 

Any person who holds a valid permit to carry a handgun issued pursuant to this section shall be authorized to carry a handgun in a holster concealed on their person in all parts of this State, except as prohibited by subsection e. of N.J.S.2C:39-5 and section 7 of P.L.2022, c.131 (C.2C:58-4.6). One permit shall be sufficient for all handguns owned by the holder thereof, but the permit shall apply only to a handgun carried by the actual and legal holder of the permit...

 

So if I am carrying a gun I own but did not submit a qual on, I am still adhering to the statute 2C:58-4a as required by my court order right?     

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • We never let then inside.  Last re-evaluation was 6-7 years ago, wife politely told him that he was welcome to look around the property and he could look in the windows. He saw two white resin chairs in the basement and told her that this constituted a finished basement. And everything in the basement is bare concrete/ cinder block, and mechanical systems. Nothing finished about it. Ultimately he relented and I'm sure that was a ploy to coerce us to allow him in
    • I use an Alien Gear cloak tuck (IWB) with my Shield.  Neoprene back - in the summer it does feel warm but doesn't rub or chafe.   https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-iwb-holster.html Could also go with the shapeshift as it has multiple options - OWB/IWB, Appendix... https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-shapeshift-modular-holster-system.html
    • The  12-1 compression ratio L88 is long gone. This is GM's updated version. it might be  pump gas 10-1 engine The L88 was a aluminum head  cast iron block engine with a nasty solid lifter cam. the  ZL1 was a all aluminum  12 or 13-1 compression ratio engine with the best forged internal parts at the time and had a even nastier solid lifter cam 
    • I like my regular carry holster.  OWB leather with belt slots.  I've been carrying for over a year and it was comfortable and I hardly even noticed it.  I carry (usually) a Ruger LCP .380 - light, convenient, tiny. But...today I ended up taking it off an leaving it home after a few hours. I cut down a big maple tree a few days ago and I spent 3/4 of today loading and unloading firewood into the back of my truck and a trailer.  It was a warm day, I was dirty, tired, sweaty, and my holster was rubbing against my side.  The leather and exposed metal snap was no longer comfortable. I'm thinking about adding a layer of something to that part of the holster to soften the contact.  Anything insulating will make it worse.  I don't want a sweaty, hotter holster against my skin.  I'm imagining something thin, breathable, that won't absorb sweat, and softer than leather, metal snaps, and rivets.   But I have no idea what would work. I'm hoping somebody else has already figured this out and I can just do what they did. Any suggestions appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...