Jump to content
Krdshrk

FPC (Cheeseman v Platkin) motions for summary judgement in NJ AWB case

By Krdshrk, in Current New Jersey Gun Laws Discussion

Recommended Posts

Krdshrk    3,877

Krdshrk
Posted

IMG_1577.png?ex=65384d15&is=6525d815&hm=

 

However the State May Attempt to Label Them, the Banned Arms are Indisputably in Common Use for Lawful Purposes.  Even if the banned firearms were considered a separate category of arms rather than simply examples of semiautomatic firearms, they still easily satisfy the common use test

Read the entire filing here:
https://assets.nationbuilder.com/firearmspolicycoalition/pages/6504/attachments/original/1696651479/Cheeseman_v_Platkin_174_Plaintiff's_MSJ.pdf?1696651479

  • Like 5

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

JackDaWack    2,895

JackDaWack
Posted
On 10/12/2023 at 9:15 AM, DirtyDigz said:

Ok, so this is just "standard procedure", and not in response to any event external to the case?

Its technically a response to Bruen, although procedural, the arguments presented wouldn't exist otherwise. 

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
Go To Topic Listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...