Jump to content
theduke

HR 822 National Right to Carry

Recommended Posts

Today's NRA ILA Alerts this morning mentions the Bill, but doesn't say anything about needing a CCW from your own state.

 

National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Bill Introduced In U.S. House

 

Friday, February 25, 2011

 

Last week, H.R. 822, was introduced in the U.S. House by Representatives Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) and Heath Shuler (D-N.C.). The measure would allow any person with a valid state-issued concealed carry permit to carry a concealed firearm in any state that issues concealed firearm permits, or that does not prohibit the carrying of concealed firearms. A state's laws governing where concealed firearms may be carried would apply within its borders. The bill also applies to Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico and U.S. territories.

 

H.R. 822 would not create a federal licensing system. Rather, it would require the states to recognize each others' carry permits, just as they recognize drivers' licenses and carry permits held by armored car guards. Rep. Stearns has introduced such legislation since 1995.

 

To read more about this legislation, please click here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Today's NRA ILA Alerts this morning mentions the Bill, but doesn't say anything about needing a CCW from your own state.

 

National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Bill Introduced In U.S. House

 

Friday, February 25, 2011

 

Last week, H.R. 822, was introduced in the U.S. House by Representatives Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) and Heath Shuler (D-N.C.). The measure would allow any person with a valid state-issued concealed carry permit to carry a concealed firearm in any state that issues concealed firearm permits, or that does not prohibit the carrying of concealed firearms. A state's laws governing where concealed firearms may be carried would apply within its borders. The bill also applies to Washington, D.C., Puerto Rico and U.S. territories.

 

H.R. 822 would not create a federal licensing system. Rather, it would require the states to recognize each others' carry permits, just as they recognize drivers' licenses and carry permits held by armored car guards. Rep. Stearns has introduced such legislation since 1995.

 

To read more about this legislation, please click here.

 

a person who is carrying a valid license which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm, may carry a concealed handgun in any State, other than the State of residence of the person, that has a statute that allows residents of the State to obtain licenses or permits to carry concealed firearms

 

Thats the confusing part. For residents of normal states they would see it as meaning In addition to where they carry now. To us it could very well mean that you would need a NJ CCW first. I just see people in NJ getting screwed because that always seems to be the case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a person who is carrying a valid license which permits the person to carry a concealed firearm, may carry a concealed handgun in any State, other than the State of residence of the person, that has a statute that allows residents of the State to obtain licenses or permits to carry concealed firearms

 

Thats the confusing part. For residents of normal states they would see it as meaning In addition to where they carry now. To us it could very well mean that you would need a NJ CCW first. I just see people in NJ getting screwed because that always seems to be the case.

 

Yep. The NRA doesn't state that. Hopefully they would fight to have that removed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point of the bill is to enforce reciprocity among all states that issue licenses or permits at all. If you have a carry permit from your home state you can carry in any state that allows carry at all, subject to the local carry laws for the least restricted permit or license they issue. If you have a license from any state but not one from your own state, you can carry in any carry-allowing state except your home state. Lastly, one key point is that a state cannot increase carry restrictions without impacting retired police, security, or other persons. The bill demands the least restricted carry rules in the state to apply to anyone who carries legally there under this bill. So to screw a citizen from PA carrying in NJ on their PA license, they would also have to screw retired and visiting LEOs, security, etc... At least this is how I see it all laying out, IANAL.

 

This bill would be attached to must-pass legislation such as the national debt limit increase coming up. Attached there, the President will sign it, IMO. With just about everyone but NJ residents able to carry here, it should create tremendous pressure coupled with the federal Muller case to change the laws to shall issue here. Also the courts would take the will of congress stated so clearly and strongly into consideration when deciding cases.

 

It would be a big win for 2A rights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

to you.. maybe..

to me... yes...

to the general public? probably not..

 

I tried a month ago. My job puts all the open positions for the company on an intraweb site. I put in for a position in Colorado. Unfortunatly they wanted someone who could start sooner than the 3-4 weeks it would take me to get there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This could be very good for us , just think if NJ allows other states CC license holders to carry in our state it would say YES we allow CC inturn opening the door for us , meaning that we(NJ) will allow someone from another state to carry a gun in NJ but not our own people , do i hear major lawsuit OR they could deny the bill which would actually be breaking their own law since we technically have a CC law so either way if the bill passes it may force NJ to show their hand ......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

what would be the odds of nj to go ,no issue, as a way to prevent non resident people from ccw here....this whole thing could open a big can of worms..if nj prevails and maintains the justifiable need requirement vs states that dont,,how would they(nj) treat that seeing as how non residents have to follow the state law they carry in....see what i mean?

i know thats alot of supposing but......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lastly, one key point is that a state cannot increase carry restrictions without impacting retired police

 

Retired police are already copvered under LEOSA. Different set of rules.

 

if nj prevails and maintains the justifiable need requirement

 

There are already "may issue" states that require a "justifiable need" that are not that picky and will accept any reasonable need listed.

 

I don't think NJ would gp to no carry.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • So, as I interpret things, you get a hit on #1. It says nothing about feeding from said magazine, just that the magazine attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip. And it is attached. Was this what was considered when it was written? 100% no. However, this is NJ and I don't think they would give you an inch when as written it covers it in plain english.  #2 would be a hard yes if you put a threaded barrel on your setup, so I'd not do that.  #3... well it's not a shroud, but it does allow you to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned. Shroud is ill defined, and it could be argued to partially enshroud the barrel from the bottom. I would bet cash money that the AG would gladly say that second part there is to clarify the intent of the law and that since you can do that, you violated the stated intent of the law. 
    • I don't know why we ( NJ gun organizations ) have not yet filed a lawsuit on "duty to inform"  A clear violation of the constitution 5th and probably 4th.  Maybe this guys lawyer will and get that charge dropped.  what other right do you need to inform a law enforcement officer of.    are you required to identify as a republican or democrat during an encounter, and by the way,  what constitutes an encounter.  voluntary? involuntary?   time to get this one knocked down. come on ANJRPC stop waiting for court decisions and go on the attack.
    • Right, each location will have a different set of Repeater frequencies you can use in your area.  You could also just have 2 sets of CHIRP files ready to go and make sure you have the ability to program them quickly in a SHTF situation.  Maybe dedicate at least one radio for each location with specific programming, and then when you get there you can re-program the radios you take with you with the programming specific to that location.   More expensive radios have the ability to program them via your phone app and BT connection.  
×
×
  • Create New...