Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I have to give an opinion. We need to refrain from yelling and shouting while the antis speak. It doesn't help. Yes, I know the lies they perpetrate can be unbearable to hear, but all the other side sees and hears are a bunch of people that can't control their emotions, therefore how can they be trusted with a gun?

 

It's unfair, it's frustrating, but we can't shout at them while they have the floor. We have to methodically refute them when it's the proper time to speak

 

I agree 100% any shouting simply works against us. First impressions are very important with this issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really like these ethical culture societies all that much. Not so much because they are usually atheist (I don't mind atheists, in fact some of my best friends are atheist) but because they believe that individual freedom gets in the way of their vision of a perfect society. So I think arguing freedom with them is pointless. What we do need to do is drown them out. Freedom is the better way, not societal perfection.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh!!! i would have make it if i would know about it earlier!! I have 3 speeches that are ready to be delivered to those ^&$%&%$!

 

 

Mods,

let's set up separate section for Alerts, this way we can subscribe to Alerts section and receive instant emails.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ahh!!! i would have make it if i would know about it earlier!! I have 3 speeches that are ready to be delivered to those ^&$%&%$!

 

 

Mods,

let's set up separate section for Alerts, this way we can subscribe to Alerts section and receive instant emails.

 

+1

 

would also be good to receive text messages to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ethical Culture Society was founded in the late 19th or early 20th centure by a Reform Rabbi. It is a fairly small group. However, it's views permeate "liberal" denominations of Judaism and Christianity. For example, Reform and Conservative Jewish groups invariably adopt the same far-left, progressive agenda and claim that is consistent with Jewish values (it isn't). Similarly, many mainline Protestant denominations adopt left-wing social and political positions. They're all pretty much the same in their views and equally well-intentioned but misguided.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to give an opinion. We need to refrain from yelling and shouting while the antis speak. It doesn't help. Yes, I know the lies they perpetrate can be unbearable to hear, but all the other side sees and hears are a bunch of people that can't control their emotions, therefore how can they be trusted with a gun?

 

It's unfair, it's frustrating, but we can't shout at them while they have the floor. We have to methodically refute them when it's the proper time to speak

 

Normally I would agree.

 

the proper response to outrage is to be outraged.

 

If the actions of our politicians aren't so extreme that yelling at them is appropriate, then how extreme do their actions have to be?

 

they acknowledged the presence of more than 1000 protesters by scheduling a vote 23 anti-gun owner bills. they acknowledged the 500 or more protesters by saying "we'll hear your comments after we vote"

 

I don't know how how much more clear they could make it that they are not going to listen to us speak nicely.

 

to my mind (to my mind only it seems) the time for shouting has come

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally I would agree.

 

the proper response to outrage is to be outraged.

 

If the actions of our politicians aren't so extreme that yelling at them is appropriate, then how extreme do their actions have to be?

 

they acknowledged the presence of more than 1000 protesters by scheduling a vote 23 anti-gun owner bills. they acknowledged the 500 or more protesters by saying "we'll hear your comments after we vote"

 

I don't know how how much more clear they could make it that they are not going to listen to us speak nicely.

 

to my mind (to my mind only it seems) the time for shouting has come

 

Were you there at the Ethical Society forum?

 

I was. I can assure you it hurt us more than it helped. I didn't say that as a blanket statement, I meant it specifically in regards to the way this meeting transpired. I am not talking about the trenton hearing which is a completely different context in which people were denied the ability to speak (I was there too).

 

Our audience was not the statists on the panel at the front of the room in Teaneck. The intended audience was the 50% of the room that was for the legislation. When someone spoke quietly and calmly to them, we had their undivided attention and they answered questions given to them sincerely. When people started berating others, they then also responded with yelling. It just makes you look bitter, and it makes them think further "i can't believe this maniac has a gun. he's scary".

 

You have to consider who the audience is and what the most effective way of communicating with them is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • So, as I interpret things, you get a hit on #1. It says nothing about feeding from said magazine, just that the magazine attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip. And it is attached. Was this what was considered when it was written? 100% no. However, this is NJ and I don't think they would give you an inch when as written it covers it in plain english.  #2 would be a hard yes if you put a threaded barrel on your setup, so I'd not do that.  #3... well it's not a shroud, but it does allow you to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned. Shroud is ill defined, and it could be argued to partially enshroud the barrel from the bottom. I would bet cash money that the AG would gladly say that second part there is to clarify the intent of the law and that since you can do that, you violated the stated intent of the law. 
    • I don't know why we ( NJ gun organizations ) have not yet filed a lawsuit on "duty to inform"  A clear violation of the constitution 5th and probably 4th.  Maybe this guys lawyer will and get that charge dropped.  what other right do you need to inform a law enforcement officer of.    are you required to identify as a republican or democrat during an encounter, and by the way,  what constitutes an encounter.  voluntary? involuntary?   time to get this one knocked down. come on ANJRPC stop waiting for court decisions and go on the attack.
    • Right, each location will have a different set of Repeater frequencies you can use in your area.  You could also just have 2 sets of CHIRP files ready to go and make sure you have the ability to program them quickly in a SHTF situation.  Maybe dedicate at least one radio for each location with specific programming, and then when you get there you can re-program the radios you take with you with the programming specific to that location.   More expensive radios have the ability to program them via your phone app and BT connection.  
×
×
  • Create New...