Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
1776

CCW 50 States

Recommended Posts

NJ Gun Forum Members:

 

Good news!  Since this moronic Supreme Court of ours has decided that the 14th Amendment means ALL states must recognize homosexual marriage  under the "equal protection of the laws" statement, then wouldn't it follow that ALL states, including New Jersey, must recognize our CCW permits.  What a slam dunk.  RTKBA is at least in the constitution, marriage no.

 

Strike now!!!!!

 

BB

Freehold NJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lol I highly doubt that's going to be recognized now. But I understand the logic behind the premise. Could work out in our favor one day. But not today.

e4468b1e07250e3b25da7b0f08063c94.jpg

 

In the meantime, I have a "Recall Sweeney" t shirt with your name on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow,

 

I guess Jersey really sucks then! Funny, the choice of colors, since in an election, blue = Republican and red = Democrat!

Here it's the opposite! Red is bad and blue is good! All meant to try to confuse us even further!

 

I have written and emailed several people at the NRA asking for support in our state! Not even one response as a card carrying

member!!! The NRA has written off New Jersey as a lost cause!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, I guess Jersey really sucks then! Funny, the choice of colors, since in an election, blue = Republican and red = Democrat! Here it's the opposite! Red is bad and blue is good! All meant to try to confuse us even further! I have written and emailed several people at the NRA asking for support in our state! Not even one response as a card carrying member!!! The NRA has written off New Jersey as a lost cause!!!!!

 

I think you lost me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He got that backwards.

 

Anyway, although you'd think that since it worked for gay marriage, it would apply to ccw, but they really didn't rationalize that the 14th applies. They (the liberal justices) just wanted to legalize gay marriage and used the 14th as an excuse.

 

The 4 liberals would have voted for it even without a 14th ammdm't. There is rarely any basis in law in their decisions. They're not really serving as judges. They're leftist activist that have a been put in a position of unchecked power.

 

The same can not be said for the 4 conservative judges. They nearly always base their decisions on the law and their role as SC justices. Roberts being the exception of late.

 

So, no. This argument won't used successfully for ccw with this court. IMHO.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He got that backwards.

 

Anyway, although you'd think that since it worked for gay marriage, it would apply to ccw, but they really didn't rationalize that the 14th applies. They (the liberal justices) just wanted to legalize gay marriage and used the 14th as an excuse.

 

The 4 liberals would have voted for it even without a 14th ammdm't. There is rarely any basis in law in their decisions. They're not really serving as judges. They're leftist activist that have a been put in a position of unchecked power.

 

The same can not be said for the 4 conservative judges. They nearly always base their decisions on the law and their role as SC justices. Roberts being the exception of late.

 

So, no. This argument won't used successfully for ccw with this court. IMHO.

Would be funny if they saw a constitutional right to gay marriage in the 2nd Amendment, but not a right to keep and bear arms. Just sayin'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NJ Gun Forum Members:

 

Good news!  Since this moronic Supreme Court of ours has decided that the 14th Amendment means ALL states must recognize homosexual marriage  under the "equal protection of the laws" statement, then wouldn't it follow that ALL states, including New Jersey, must recognize our CCW permits.  What a slam dunk.  RTKBA is at least in the constitution, marriage no.

 

Strike now!!!!!

 

BB

Freehold NJ

I don't see the NRA jumping at this anytime soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • What's the crime for riding a dirt bike on the street? Most likely a fine, misdemeanor at most. That justifies causing severe bodily injury through use of lethal force by auto?  There is no way to predict that he would have hit anyone, it's more like a 99.9% he wouldn't have hit anyone.  And that was a 2 lane road, not a pedestrian walkway. Hopefully he hires a good lawyer and everyone is held accountable for their actions.
    • Seriously? “Sounds Fishy”? You can’t think of a reason why the cop thought that was going to happen after watching the video? The cops are there after multiple reports/complaints of vehicles in the pedestrian walkway and reports of near misses. The ATV is on a pedestrian walkway where there are not supposed to be any vehicles and is moving at very fast pace. If he couldn’t stop for the police car, what makes you think he could stop in time for a pedestrian. He dynamited the breaks to avoid hitting the car and lost complete control of the ATV. Luckily the mass of the car prevented it from continuing to tumble down the walkway and take out pedestrians like bowling pins. If he had hit the brakes like that to avoid hitting a pedestrian instead of the car, would the ATV not have flipped? What would the now out of control ATV have done to any people in the walkway? Would the first person be hit have enough mass to stop the ATV in its proverbial tracks? I have seen plenty of pedestrians stuck. It is never like the movies. They don’t parkour out of the way of a speeding car - especially when pushing a baby carriage and the vehicle is approaching from the rear in a place where you think you are safe because vehicles are it permitted.
    • https://giphy.com/clips/storyful-trump-donald-indictment-lVIMcvvqgZXsRBRJN6
    • Why would he think the ATV rider was going to run over the pedestrians? Were the pedestrians laying in the road? Sounds fishy. A good lawyer will have a field day with this one.
    • If I lived in the hills, (or the burbs with a tall tree) I'd invest in at least one dedicated repeater and a solar based system to power it.  I don't think you need a tremendous amount of battery capacity, as the repeater will be on standby most of the time.  It will only draw serious current when it transmits. I think one could set up a reliable, self sustaining private node for around $1,500, maybe less.   Agree 100%
×
×
  • Create New...