Jump to content
FLHX

USPSA class #'s and state break down

Recommended Posts

I'm actually very surprised that the numbers are not much larger.  I would have assumed on a national basis there would be a lot more than 24,000 or so members.  Does any one have a clue what similar numbers are for IDPA?

 

Its interesting to see that 60324, or roughly 2.5 times the number of current members either have quit or died.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think both org need to have the NRA send out some more junk mail to inform gun owners that our sport even exist. Only partly kidding, I think more marketing is needed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm actually very surprised that the numbers are not much larger. I would have assumed on a national basis there would be a lot more than 24,000 or so members. Does any one have a clue what similar numbers are for IDPA?

 

Its interesting to see that 60324, or roughly 2.5 times the number of current members either have quit or died.

I was also supprised bu how few their are. Figured with them putting out a good magazine and all there would be more members.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many things at play.

 

1) If we had double the shooters, I'm not sure we could hold matches of the same quality. As match quality would decrease, so would attendance and a balance would be found

 

2) Our hobby is expensive. Not everyone is willing to shoot 200 rounds in a match plus whatever to practice

 

3) There is a VAST number of people who would never compete because they don't think as competition as something for them. Some won't ever compete because the buy the BS of "it will kill you on the street". Some feel like the don't belong. Basically they'll never shoot any competition of any sort

 

4) Lots of people don't shoot handguns for fun, but they'll shoot rifle, or shotgun, or air gun competition.

 

5) Lots of people won't commit a day or two a month

 

6) Lots of people get discouraged.

 

7) Lots of people shoot matches without every joining an organization.

 

8) Around here we have so much competition, of every possible type, that people will pick whatever they like best, in other place with lower population density you have fewer options so you shoot whats available. 

 

9) If you add steel, IDPA, USPS, 3gun,  PPC, cowboy, etc, there are hundreds of thousands of "action shooters". Think how many people own cars. How many of them race them?

 

10) Guns are icky. Lots of people, even gun owners, sometimes fall to the "gun are bad" bullshit and while they may want to keep their guns, they may not want to associate with "those crazy people at the range"

 

Those are just a few off the top of my head.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many things at play.

 

1) If we had double the shooters, I'm not sure we could hold matches of the same quality. As match quality would decrease, so would attendance and a balance would be found

 

2) Our hobby is expensive. Not everyone is willing to shoot 200 rounds in a match plus whatever to practice

 

3) There is a VAST number of people who would never compete because they don't think as competition as something for them. Some won't ever compete because the buy the BS of "it will kill you on the street". Some feel like the don't belong. Basically they'll never shoot any competition of any sort

 

4) Lots of people don't shoot handguns for fun, but they'll shoot rifle, or shotgun, or air gun competition.

 

5) Lots of people won't commit a day or two a month

 

6) Lots of people get discouraged.

 

7) Lots of people shoot matches without every joining an organization.

 

8) Around here we have so much competition, of every possible type, that people will pick whatever they like best, in other place with lower population density you have fewer options so you shoot whats available. 

 

9) If you add steel, IDPA, USPS, 3gun,  PPC, cowboy, etc, there are hundreds of thousands of "action shooters". Think how many people own cars. How many of them race them?

 

10) Guns are icky. Lots of people, even gun owners, sometimes fall to the "gun are bad" bullshit and while they may want to keep their guns, they may not want to associate with "those crazy people at the range"

 

Those are just a few off the top of my head.

Most of those are all valid points.  I think if more people got involved there would be more places that would hold competitions.  The way I was looking at it is there are so many people that buy a hand gun and tuck it in a draw.  Many more that actually go to a range a few times a year, but that is the extent of their training.  It would be great if all those people got involved and actually learned to shoot at something "quickly".  So many don't practice at all or if they do they carefully fire one shot after aiming for 90 seconds.  Also think how it would help us with the idiots in Trenton if we were able to get more than a few hundred people involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Competition is uncomfortable for a lot of people. They know how good they are and they come out to a match and get their ego trashed by a 60 year old out of shape desk jockey or a 40 year old accountant or...pick any 'non-athletic' type and they don;t come back.

 

Vlad hit most of the others I can think of; time, money, interest, stupidity. OK, that last might be a bit harsh, but learning to shoot fast under time preasure is not bad. What will 'get you killed on the street' is not being able to hit a target when you are under pressure. Think how many people we all know that can't hit the paper at 25 yards!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm very glad to see it is as healthy as it is, but I agree that without more ranges hosting events, there is little point to (or chance of) growing the membership much more.

 

I loved shooting ipsc, but stopped almost 20 years ago because there were far too many shooters for the available ranges. I just couldn't deal with investing 8-10 hours a day to shoot for two minutes aggregate time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I loved shooting ipsc, but stopped almost 20 years ago because there were far too many shooters for the available ranges. I just couldn't deal with investing 8-10 hours a day to shoot for two minutes aggregate time.

 

 

You gotta come down to SC then.  The two matches I go to host 70+ people and are done in about 4 hours or less!

 

I'm sort of surprised how many members are from Commiefornia and how few are in NH.  Although I think NH is more into IDPA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ugh, you're going to shoot revolver for another 2 years?  Why punish yourself like that

They should open a new category of matchlock pistol. It would help the revolver guys self esteem by not being the slowest reloaders.

 

Or do they try to reload in slow motion? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Posts

    • Single stage will have a tighter tolerance, and you have more control over the process.  Progressives are for bulk range fodder. Every experienced reloader gave me the same advice when I was getting into the hobby, start with single stage, so you can truly understand the reloading process and what you have to do on your end to make great ammo.  Once you have mastered that, then you can think about a progressive. If you want to add a bit of convenience to your single stage reloading, a turret press (rotates the dies, not the shell plate) is probably better suited.  It is still effectively a single stage operation, but you don't have to keep removing and remounting dies. I'm not sure what you mean by this.  Whatever press you get, it will have to be secured to a work surface in some way.  I bought an inexpensive 20"x20" work surface from HF to permanently mount my shotshell press on.  It is mounted very sturdy and durable with the added 1/2" hardwood plank and extra big washers. If you haven't already, you should check out some of the reloading channels on YT.  Ultimate Reloader is one of my faves, but there are scores of others with great advice.  See it in action.
    • The 550 is not a true progressive as it does not auto index, right? I'm in the process of selling myself on a XL750. For a starter press, you can't go far wrong with a Lee Classic Turret. It is cheap, auto indexes, and swapping calibers is easy. NB. If you go for a manually indexed press and work multiple cartridges at once, be particularly careful to monitor the powder drop stage to avoid no powder or double charges. With an auto indexing press the risk is way lower.
    • The Dillon 550's are amazing machines.  Plenty fast, and while there are faster machines in the Dillon lineup, the trade-off is that the faster ones take longer to change between calibers, and the caliber conversion kits are more expensive.   You can use the 550 as a single stage press, one cartridge in the shell plate at a time, rotating between the stations after each handle pull.  It's a good way to start out and gain experience. I've got a single stage press as well, used for larger rifle cartridges and the occasional oddball handgun cartridge that I don't shoot enough to justify the cost of a caliber conversion kit for the Dillon...but it sounds like those use cases aren't in your immediate future.    
    • Why is the single stage an advantage exactly? Could I not build them on the progressive? 
    • My suggestion is to get a single stage too.  This way it's easier to build loads as for progressives I run two lee pro 1000s ones set up for large pistol primers and one for small.
×
×
  • Create New...