Jump to content
Scorpio64

Net Neutrality on the Chopping Block Again

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, gleninjersey said:

Interesting topic which a few of my family where discussing at the family Thanksgiving get together.

Over view of discussion:

.

Take away was government helped create problem by helping companies in infancy of cable by essentially creating monopolies.  Then decades later with advent of streaming arose competition to monopolies.  New comers benefited by not paying more despite using more data.  2015 government intervenes and again creates problems because of what may happen.   This causes caling back of progress and expansion.  Now gov wants to repeal act to stimulate expansion and improvements in technology.  Some upset because blocking and throttling may occur even though it hadn't in past.  Concerns consumers may be forced to pay more.

 

 

 

 

sorry to chop post.....

 

most problems of these types are govt created.

 

 the gove that governs least governs best.

if you do it right, no one will be sure if you did anything at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@gleninjersey I linked something earlier in this thread that shows original "net neutrality" came up AFTER some cable companies started to throttle / control.  Just like you and I pay for "using" the net at home, companies like Google / Amazon / etc pay for connecting to backbones.  In fact, service companies often pay by bandwidth measure and not a "$30 / month unlimited" deals that individuals are offered.  "Unlimited" is just a marketing gimmick like it always was. 

People also quickly forget how some cable companies were fleecing customers by taking advantage of local monopoly. I dont believe fairness is in the DNA of some of these companies now complaining about net neutrality. 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, gleninjersey said:

  New comers benefited by not paying more despite using more data.  

This seems to be a falicy.  Everyone pays for their connections and data usage. Consumers, companies, everyone.  I’m sure Netflix pays a hefty price for their bandwidth and hosting agreements. Consumers certainly pay for their connection.   The difference is that without NN companies would be free to bias based on source/destination. So access to amazon, youporn, or Netflix would be limited to special packages. Imagine the Web carved up like cable channel packages except worse. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This was internet video about ten years ago:

 

This was internet "video" 20 years ago:

 

download.jpg

So if you're sitting here acting like "well see there, the government caused this because blah blah they weren't throttling nothing ten years ago!" Well then you maybe need a refresher that ten years ago Netflix used to mail you DVDs....


There is literally no such thing as "it was fine in the past" with this issue. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only have one internet option, just one. I have no other choice if my ISP decides to control which websites i have access to and if they want to slow down speeds to services like Amazon or Netflix. This whole issue started with video streaming services. 

Metro PCS stopped all streaming expect Youtube and Verizon was throttling down netflix connections. If you think ISPs weren't doing this then  Imagine when you buy your internet service you get to pick packages based on what site and services you use. It makes no sense to allow companies the ability to regulate content. If i pay for 60mbs service a month, the only bottle neck should be on the server end of what I'm accessing. There is no legitimate reason for ISPs to artificially manipulate connection speeds. They are trying to get companies to pay them for priority service... AND get the consumer to pay more for services.

This is nothing more than a money grab.

If you think this is about breaking monopolies your living in denial about how government regulation is bad. This has been around for only a few years, and there is nothing to suggest it would be any different then before it was implemented.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • We never let then inside.  Last re-evaluation was 6-7 years ago, wife politely told him that he was welcome to look around the property and he could look in the windows. He saw two white resin chairs in the basement and told her that this constituted a finished basement. And everything in the basement is bare concrete/ cinder block, and mechanical systems. Nothing finished about it. Ultimately he relented and I'm sure that was a ploy to coerce us to allow him in
    • I use an Alien Gear cloak tuck (IWB) with my Shield.  Neoprene back - in the summer it does feel warm but doesn't rub or chafe.   https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-iwb-holster.html Could also go with the shapeshift as it has multiple options - OWB/IWB, Appendix... https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-shapeshift-modular-holster-system.html
    • The  12-1 compression ratio L88 is long gone. This is GM's updated version. it might be  pump gas 10-1 engine The L88 was a aluminum head  cast iron block engine with a nasty solid lifter cam. the  ZL1 was a all aluminum  12 or 13-1 compression ratio engine with the best forged internal parts at the time and had a even nastier solid lifter cam 
    • I like my regular carry holster.  OWB leather with belt slots.  I've been carrying for over a year and it was comfortable and I hardly even noticed it.  I carry (usually) a Ruger LCP .380 - light, convenient, tiny. But...today I ended up taking it off an leaving it home after a few hours. I cut down a big maple tree a few days ago and I spent 3/4 of today loading and unloading firewood into the back of my truck and a trailer.  It was a warm day, I was dirty, tired, sweaty, and my holster was rubbing against my side.  The leather and exposed metal snap was no longer comfortable. I'm thinking about adding a layer of something to that part of the holster to soften the contact.  Anything insulating will make it worse.  I don't want a sweaty, hotter holster against my skin.  I'm imagining something thin, breathable, that won't absorb sweat, and softer than leather, metal snaps, and rivets.   But I have no idea what would work. I'm hoping somebody else has already figured this out and I can just do what they did. Any suggestions appreciated.
×
×
  • Create New...