She's BACK! My 1911 has returned to the flock!

[DevsAdvocate 112]

So... after some long consternation (LINK), I sent my Kimber 1911 off to the manufacturer for some repair work. Told them the thing needed work and that I was dissatisfied with the performance of the external extractor. Now, after 6 weeks of work, I have her back, and I won't lie, I missed her so.

 

To start... BEFORE:

 

AFTER:

 

Kimber did a good job replacing the slide, polishing the barrel and other components and cleaning the whole shibang up!

 

Now I just need some free time to shoot the damned thing. :twisted:

[Old School 611]

If I remember correctly this was a series I gun with internal extractor problems. How much did they charge you?

[DevsAdvocate 112]

If I remember correctly this was a series I gun with internal extractor problems. How much did they charge you?

 

It was the series with an external extractor that was the issue. Kimber went from internal to external (failed) and went back to internal.

 

As for the cost: free of charge. Shipping left me out like $40.

[Old School 611]

Great Deal!!

[Shane45 807]

40 bucks to ditch the external extractor....worth every penny!

[DevsAdvocate 112]

40 bucks to ditch the external extractor....worth every penny!

 

And to get a nice polishing and fitting of components. It's practically a new gun.

[totalabuse 27]

[jermz1987 243]

Congrats on getting her back. Let us know how she shoots.

[lunker 274]

Call me a traditionalist, but a 1911 just looks much better with an internal extractor.

[tbtrout 141]

Call me a traditionalist, but a 1911 just looks much better with an internal extractor.

I agree

[DevsAdvocate 112]

Call me a traditionalist, but a 1911 just looks much better with an internal extractor.

 

Definitely.

[djg0770 481]

Call me a traditionalist, but a 1911 just looks much better with an internal extractor.

I agree

 

Internal vs external PALES in comparison to no rail vs rail.

 

IMO to be a true 1911, no rail...

[DevsAdvocate 112]

Call me a traditionalist, but a 1911 just looks much better with an internal extractor.

I agree

 

Internal vs external PALES in comparison to no rail vs rail.

 

IMO to be a true 1911, no rail...

 

The rail provides for options and versatility, a quaint update on an tested design. :mrgreen:

[Shane45 807]

The correct answer is, one of each

 

Cant have nothing but 7 Irons in yer golf bag!

[n4p226r 105]

looks great.

 

 

slightly hijacking the post, what does are the disadvantages and advantages of each type of extractor. i think the sig does an external extractor on their 1911 as well

[DevsAdvocate 112]

looks great.

 

 

slightly hijacking the post, what does are the disadvantages and advantages of each type of extractor. i think the sig does an external extractor on their 1911 as well

 

Kimber external extractors suck. S&W and Sig ones are good to go.

 

Long story is (from my understanding of it all): a lot of companies moved to external extractors believing them to be a superior design in terms of both performance and ease-of-manufacture. Internal extractors require precise tensioning to operate properly, whereas external ones do not, and are therefor easier to manufacture.

 

External extractors are a superior design when used from the ground up (GLOCK), but when shoehorned into other platforms (1911), they tend to have difficulties. Sig and S&W invested a lot in their design, and typically have good QC to back it up. Kimber... they used to be great, but then tried to cut corners with an external extractor.