Clothing - Hunting/Outdoor/Tactical/EDC
Discussion for Clothing dealing with Training/Hunting/Carry with firearms
22 topics in this forum
-
- 3 replies
- 679 views
-
-
- 16 replies
- 634 views
-
- 9 replies
- 2,932 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1,870 views
-
- 34 replies
- 5,094 views
-
- 22 replies
- 3,029 views
-
- 31 replies
- 4,911 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1,500 views
-
- 0 replies
- 2,903 views
-
- 23 replies
- 2,387 views
-
- 103 replies
- 11,699 views
-
- 50 replies
- 4,579 views
-
- 25 replies
- 3,275 views
-
- 14 replies
- 3,368 views
-
- 9 replies
- 2,484 views
-
- 45 replies
- 4,780 views
-
- 26 replies
- 3,369 views
-
- 1 reply
- 1,890 views
-
- 15 replies
- 2,478 views
-
- 55 replies
- 4,612 views
-
- 87 replies
- 11,515 views
-
- 15 replies
- 2,554 views
-
Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items
-
Topics
-
-
-
Supporting Vendors
-
-
Posts
-
-
-
-
By Grima Squeakersen · Posted
Have you done any research into the cost and licensing requirements to run a repeater? We own some mountainous acreage in a very rural part of Virginia RIdge and Valley country that serves as vacation place and potential SHTF retreat. We get mediocre cell phone coverage (US Cellular only) and nothing else. I have thought of putting an antenna tower up the hill a ways (we own nearly to the top of the ridge. I wouldn't do it just for Ham or GMRS radio, but if I could get expanded cell coverage, and/or satellite internet (Dish or Starlink) as well, from one tower, I might go for it. ==== sorry, didn't intend to hijack the thread ==== -
By Grima Squeakersen · Posted
The biggest problem with this announcement is that the FBI has proven itself to be completely untrustworthy, but it is the agency charged with keeping the public informed about such developments. So, this is something that Wray and the FBI want us to believe, because they are convinced that is in their best interests that we do so. But how much objective truth is there to it? Are Biden's enviro-Nazi puppeteers planning to sabotage the internet and what is left of our petrochemical production capability and somehow false flag attribute that attack to the Chinese? Unlikely, but it's terrible and damning that I even need to seriously consider that possibility. It's a dilemma. Reminds me of an old Star Trek TV episode where Kirk short-circuits some robotic adversary by telling it, "I always lie. Listen very carefully. I am lying to you..." Personally, I'll wait until I see some corroboration of this from something that I regard as a trusted source (and those are few and far between these days) before I buy it.
-
-
