Best 22 revolver???

[Philevon 2]

Ruger? Smith? NAA? Etc? I may be in the market for a 22 revolver, looking for ideas as to what you think is the best. Pictures would be good too. Thanks.

[GRIZ 3,369]

Smith or Ruger. Take your pick of frame size and DA or SA. NAA is more of a novelty item.

[Underdog 1,593]

Smith or Ruger. Take your pick of frame size and DA or SA. NAA is more of a novelty item.

 

That would largely depend on what you are going to do with it and your budget. I would look into the following and generally prefer double action/single action to single action only.

 

S&W 617 will probably be the nicest quality and have the best trigger... you cannot go wrong, but you are going to pay for it

Ruger SP101 ... nice little kit gun and probably the most durable of the bunch... might need a grip change for a fuller grip

Taurus 992 double action with .22LR and .22WMR cylinder sets... versatile and fun... 990 does not have magnum cylinder.

or the new S&W version of the kit gun... don't know the name or model and have no experience with it, but it's probably pricey, but sweet

 

 

That being said... there are a lot of single actions such as the Ruger Single Six that would also be nice. And, for the money, the Charter Arms Pathfinder would probably be OK.

 

For toughness and durability and versatility, I would go with the SP101 unless you want a snubby or a longer-barrelled range gun.

[Ray Ray 3,566]

Smith or Ruger, OR if you want to man up get a Taurus 992.

[this_is_nascar 162]

"Best" is subjective. What's "best" to me may not be "best" to you. I'll put my Taurus 94 5" up against any .22 revolver out there and at about half the price.

[Pizza Bob 1,488]

...or the new S&W version of the kit gun... don't know the name or model and have no experience with it, but it's probably pricey, but sweet

 

??????????? The S&W kit gun traces its heritage back to 1911 when the initial shipment of Bekeart .22's was made. They were built on the I-frame, which became the J-frame. Currently they are the model 34 in the blued version and the model 63 in the stainless. I have a pre-model 34 dating from the 1950's.

 

Is there something new?

 

Adios,

 

Pizza Bob

[Caine 147]

Is there something new?

Not new, but when I hear S&W "kit gun" I think model 317.

http://www.smith-wes...playErrorView_Y

[Pizza Bob 1,488]

Not new, but when I hear S&W "kit gun" I think model 317.

http://www.smith-wes...playErrorView_Y

 

That's a K-frame. Kit guns have always been built on the small frame (I or J) so they fit in your "kit".

[Caine 147]

That's a K-frame. Kit guns have always been built on the small frame (I or J) so they fit in your "kit".

Are we looking at the same gun? The 317 "kit gun" is listed as a small frame/J frame...

[Pizza Bob 1,488]

Are we looking at the same gun? The 317 "kit gun" is listed as a small frame/J frame...

 

I stand corrected. I was going by S&W's normal numbering pattern and this is the only example that I (now) know of where it goes outside the normal model numbering scheme. The model 17 is a .22 built on a K-frame. The prefix number 6 indicates stainless, thus a 617 is a stainless K-frame .22. The 3 prefix usually indicates a lightweight variation, so I was thinking that a 317 was a lightweight K-frame .22.

 

Things started to get muddled when they went to 3-digit model numbering schemes. There may be other examples of this cross-frame model numbering, but since I was unaware of this one, it stands to reason that I'm unaware of any others.

 

The 317 would indeed be considered a lightweight variant of the kit gun. The blued lightweight was called the model 43. There is no model 643. Why the 317 is an exception to their model numbering scheme is anybody's guess.

 

Even with that, the 317 is 15 years old having been introduced in 1997. Thanks for the correction.

 

Adios,

 

Pizza Bob

[Gun Guy in NJ 10]

I have the S&W 63 and I love it.

[tony357 386]

The smith 63 and taurus tracker..

 

http://www.taurususa.com/product-details.cfm?id=392&category=Revolver

[EMB 1]

Another vote for the S&W 22 revolvers. Here's my mid-70s Model 63 with Pachmayr grips (because the wood grips are too small even for my girlie hands). The 317 newer ones use a rounded butt J frame, and are 8 shots.

 

[Underdog 1,593]

I saw it in one of the magazines. Perhaps this is what was being talked about, but this has been out for some time...

 

http://www.gunblast.com/SW-63.htm

[hd2000fxdl 422]

The one that works best for you and fits the purpose you want one for and you can be Happy with. Try them all, many members here have 22LR wheelies, ask around and see who might let you try their gun out. I have a Taurus 94 and if your ever down in the OBRPC area, you're more than welcome to try mine out.

[M4BGRINGO 139]

I have a 617, 6" barrel, It is a joke to shoot, almost wonder if you pulled the trigger. Same exact gun as a 686, but with a very tiny hole for the itty-bitty bullet.

 

Mine is a 10-shot.

[Pizza Bob 1,488]

I have a 617, 6" barrel, It is a joke to shoot, almost wonder if you pulled the trigger. Same exact gun as a 686, but with a very tiny hole for the itty-bitty bullet.

 

Mine is a 10-shot.

 

Not quite. 686 = L-frame / 617 = K-frame

[claptrap 0]

Not saying its the best but I wanted a .22 DA and I picked up a Taurus 970 tracker online for about $240. 7 shot, 6.5in barrel. It's a heavy gun but it works for me, gonna pick up the scope mount for it.

[NotJust22s 10]

I'd say my favorite is the S&W 617.

[M4BGRINGO 139]

Not quite. 686 = L-frame / 617 = K-frame

 

Guess I need to lay them side by side, they looked the same to me. The weight felt the same. I have a Model 19 to compare the 617 to, I think that one is a k-frame.

[Pizza Bob 1,488]

I have a Model 19 to compare the 617 to, I think that one is a k-frame.

 

That's correct, except the 617 would have a full underlug and the 19 just an ejector rod shroud - so the 617 may be heavier.

[Pizza Bob 1,488]

I've been sniping from the sidelines throughout this thread but haven't really put in my $.02 worth on what I would like in a .22 revolver. I would absolutely love to have a Colt 4" Diamondback in .22. That being said, they're out there, I just don't want to pay today's going rate should I actually stumble across one.

 

Another nice, but somewhat rare .22 is a Dan Wesson. It will be interesting to see how much of the DW revolver line CZ decides to bring back.

 

Adios,

 

Pizza Bob

[diamondd817 828]

Why is the S&W 617 22lr more expensive than the 686 357mag?

[Pizza Bob 1,488]

Why is the S&W 617 22lr more expensive than the 686 357mag?

 

MSRP is the same for both guns at $829. Street price is driven by the market.

[NotJust22s 10]

MSRP is the same for both guns at $829. Street price is driven by the market.

 

Saw one at SImon Peter use in nice shape for $600. I got mine almost new a few years back for $400.

[Pizza Bob 1,488]

One of the market conditions that drives pricing on guns, is ammo cost. As centerfire ammo prices increase, people gravitate to rimfires causing a demand and subsequent price rise in the cost of rimfire arms. I think that is partially what we are seeing now.

[M4BGRINGO 139]

That is why I bought this 617 Bob!

[this_is_nascar 162]

One of the market conditions that drives pricing on guns, is ammo cost. As centerfire ammo prices increase, people gravitate to rimfires causing a demand and subsequent price rise in the cost of rimfire arms. I think that is partially what we are seeing now.

 

 

Very true, but I think it's more of a matter of S&W being overpriced compare to other offerings out there now. It's no longer the 70's and 80's where selection was limited. S&W doesn't seem to realize that, however there are still the S&W followers that allow thier prices to be what they are. I compare the S&W label to the Harley Davidson label. Just about every other offering will be a better value, however it doesn't have the big brand name.

[Pizza Bob 1,488]

Very true, but I think it's more of a matter of S&W being overpriced compare to other offerings out there now. It's no longer the 70's and 80's where selection was limited. S&W doesn't seem to realize that, however there are still the S&W followers that allow thier prices to be what they are. I compare the S&W label to the Harley Davidson label. Just about every other offering will be a better value, however it doesn't have the big brand name.

 

Ahhh, Grasshopper. So much to learn, so little time.

[this_is_nascar 162]

Ahhh, Grasshopper. So much to learn, so little time.

 

 

Educate me. I've never been against learning and will always admit if I'm wrong. I also have the ability to change my opinion if someone presents a case that makes better sense than what I believe.