Jump to content
DirtyDigz

Aimsurplus NATO SS109/M855 1K rds ~$423.00 shipped

Recommended Posts

I have 1k m855 that has been sitting in my safe for 3 years, and it will probably continue to waste space for the rest of my life. Its not even that good of a round. When I saw this news I did buy another 1k of 193, just a reminder to stock up now, before the shtf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

those of you saying it's not a good round, how many barrier tests have you done, have you hunted big hogs with it?

Nothing scientific but I've shot plenty of cinder blocks, steel plates, and water jugs.  And why would I hunt a big hog with a .22 caliber?  Especially one that doesn't expand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nothing scientific but I've shot plenty of cinder blocks, steel plates, and water jugs.  And why would I hunt a big hog with a .22 caliber?  Especially one that doesn't expand.

so then you haven't hunted with it....

 

I have, and it's great on big hogs as it you get them up high in the shoulder area and it drops them in their tracks.

 

This round is not built to be frangible like 193, it serves a different purpose.  It does very well in barrier penetration and breaking bones:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so then you haven't hunted with it....

 

I have, and it's great on big hogs as it you get them up high in the shoulder area and it drops them in their tracks.

 

This round is not built to be frangible like 193, it serves a different purpose.  It does very well in barrier penetration and breaking bones:)

I don't want to derail this thread with the ethics of hunting but I believe there are far superior bullets for taking hog-sized game than M855.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so then you haven't hunted with it....

 

I have, and it's great on big hogs as it you get them up high in the shoulder area and it drops them in their tracks.

 

This round is not built to be frangible like 193, it serves a different purpose.  It does very well in barrier penetration and breaking bones:)

It was degined to be a more ethical round in combat war zones. Where the 193 would fragment and create large wounds, the 855 was a more "humanitarian" round, and many people complained about its stopping power due top its ability to pass cleanly through a target. You can hunt hogs all you want with it, certainly wont argue over soemthing that works for you. But in the grand scheme of things there are not many people who use it to hunt, and most just shoot paper with it. LIke i said, i have some of it. and was a shtf purchase. If i didnt want it i would sell it off right now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was degined to be a more ethical round in combat war zones. Where the 193 would fragment and create large wounds, the 855 was a more "humanitarian" round, and many people complained about its stopping power due top its ability to pass cleanly through a target. You can hunt hogs all you want with it, certainly wont argue over soemthing that works for you. But in the grand scheme of things there are not many people who use it to hunt, and most just shoot paper with it. LIke i said, i have some of it. and was a shtf purchase. If i didnt want it i would sell it off right now.

agree on it's creation but disagree on it's use.  In LA and Miss (areas I've been on hog hunts), it's widely used for the big ones as the hides are pretty thick and they'll run regardless so literally blowing up their shoulders works great.

 

anyway, good discussion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to derail this thread with the ethics of hunting but I believe there are far superior bullets for taking hog-sized game than M855.

I agree, as with all things however, shot placement is key and the .22 cal does a nice job with the right bullet, on the right sized hog, in the right location.  I prefer the 6.8 generally

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

 

what he said.

So the idiots in DC hatch an end around scheme to ban one segment of the 5.56 market knowing full well the panic buying dummies would go out in full freak-out mode and buy out EVERY type of 5.56 ammo..causing the emptying of wallets nationwide....HOOK..LINE..AND SINKER..great job panic buyers...I have a bridge for sale if youre interested..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I use an Alien Gear cloak tuck (IWB) with my Shield.  Neoprene back - in the summer it does feel warm but doesn't rub or chafe.   https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-iwb-holster.html Could also go with the shapeshift as it has multiple options - OWB/IWB, Appendix... https://aliengearholsters.com/ruger-lcp-shapeshift-modular-holster-system.html
    • The  12-1 compression ratio L88 is long gone. This is GM's updated version. it might be  pump gas 10-1 engine The L88 was a aluminum head  cast iron block engine with a nasty solid lifter cam. the  ZL1 was a all aluminum  12 or 13-1 compression ratio engine with the best forged internal parts at the time and had a even nastier solid lifter cam 
    • I like my regular carry holster.  OWB leather with belt slots.  I've been carrying for over a year and it was comfortable and I hardly even noticed it.  I carry (usually) a Ruger LCP .380 - light, convenient, tiny. But...today I ended up taking it off an leaving it home after a few hours. I cut down a big maple tree a few days ago and I spent 3/4 of today loading and unloading firewood into the back of my truck and a trailer.  It was a warm day, I was dirty, tired, sweaty, and my holster was rubbing against my side.  The leather and exposed metal snap was no longer comfortable. I'm thinking about adding a layer of something to that part of the holster to soften the contact.  Anything insulating will make it worse.  I don't want a sweaty, hotter holster against my skin.  I'm imagining something thin, breathable, that won't absorb sweat, and softer than leather, metal snaps, and rivets.   But I have no idea what would work. I'm hoping somebody else has already figured this out and I can just do what they did. Any suggestions appreciated.
    • Check the primers on the ammo you didn't shoot yet. Are they fully seated? If the primer is not just below flush with the back of the case, the first hit can seat it better then the second hit ignites it. 
    • And, charging your car at home? We've got you covered! California braces for new electric plan: Make more, pay more | Fox Business
×
×
  • Create New...