Lawsuits

[capt14k 2,052]

Where do the lawsuits stand?

 

Cheeseman-Jilliard can't lose lost twice now it seems. It really seemed like a good idea to me, good enough that I kicked in a couple hundred. Much better than the crazy RICO suit. Problem is NJ courts are too damn corrupt. I see they hired a new attorney. Were they representing themselves previously? Next stop NJ Supreme Court I assume? Are they prepared to go through the Federal courts?

 

Where is the ANJRPC Carry Lawsuit at?

 

What about the magazine ban? 3 judge panel from 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals asked to rehear arguments? Has this been done? When are they expected to rule? Regardless of how they rule I am guessing it will go to the full court of Appeals which will rule against us. Next stop SCOTUS?

 

No other lawsuits planned by ANJRPC? Just going to be reactionary? Wait til they pass AWB then file lawsuit that will go nowhere?

 

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

 

 

[voyager9 3,434]

1 hour ago, capt14k said:

What about the magazine ban? 3 judge panel from 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals asked to rehear arguments? Has this been done? 

The rehearing was today at 10 over in Philly. 

[voyager9 3,434]

https://www.anjrpc.org/page/NoDecisionInDo-OverMagBanArgument

 

[Smokin .50 1,907]

3 hours ago, capt14k said:

 

Where do the lawsuits stand?

 

Cheeseman-Jilliard can't lose lost twice now it seems. It really seemed like a good idea to me, good enough that I kicked in a couple hundred. Much better than the crazy RICO suit. Problem is NJ courts are too damn corrupt. I see they hired a new attorney. Were they representing themselves previously? Next stop NJ Supreme Court I assume? Are they prepared to go through the Federal courts?

 

Where is the ANJRPC Carry Lawsuit at?

 

What about the magazine ban? 3 judge panel from 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals asked to rehear arguments? Has this been done? When are they expected to rule? Regardless of how they rule I am guessing it will go to the full court of Appeals which will rule against us. Next stop SCOTUS?

 

No other lawsuits planned by ANJRPC? Just going to be reactionary? Wait til they pass AWB then file lawsuit that will go nowhere?

 

Sent from my XT1585 using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Tune-in to GunForHire Radio & most all of your questions will be answered by Ant & Scott Bach.

[capt14k 2,052]

Tune-in to GunForHire Radio & most all of your questions will be answered by Ant & Scott Bach.

In good conscience I can not do that.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[SJG 253]

http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/oralargument/audio/18-3170AssociationofNewJerseyRifle&PistolClubsInc,Etal.v.AttyGenNewJersey,etal..mp3

Audio File

[njJoniGuy 2,131]

18 hours ago, SJG said:

http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/oralargument/audio/18-3170AssociationofNewJerseyRifle&PistolClubsInc,Etal.v.AttyGenNewJersey,etal..mp3

Audio File

Thank you for posting the link to the hour and a quarter of oral testimony.

The State's arguments are shit.

Everyone with the ability to listen to this file should do so. This case is THAT important.

[nondisclosure 55]

14 minutes ago, njJoniGuy said:

Thank you for posting the link to the hour and a quarter of oral testimony.

The State's arguments are shit.

Everyone with the ability to listen to this file should do so. This case is THAT important.

Listening to it now. The judge is VERY dismissive to the plaintiffs argument. Its pretty disgusting actually.

 

[SJG 253]

I completely disagree with your analysis. Both sides  did an excellent job in advocating their respective positions and the judges were not dismissive of either sides arguments

[silverado427 10,731]

I'm very Optimistic after listening to the audio file.

[Zeke 5,504]

A CNN study? Wtf?

[nondisclosure 55]

10 hours ago, SJG said:

I completely disagree with your analysis. Both sides  did an excellent job in advocating their respective positions and the judges were not dismissive of either sides arguments

That fine. When you count how many rebuttals and or questions the judge had for the plaintiff compared to the defendant, you'll see how irregular the conversation was. Any valid points were clearly a forethought.

Its over, mail em out.

or bury em.

[JohnnyB 4,326]

1 hour ago, Chris1 said:

That fine. When you count how many rebuttals and or questions the judge had for the plaintiff compared to the defendant, you'll see how irregular the conversation was. Any valid points were clearly a forethought.

Its over, mail em out.

or bury em.

Or keep em!