Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
ronhonda

BushMaster ACR recall

Recommended Posts

After MUCH debate between acr or scar, as much as I like the looks of the ACR I decided against it. One of the biggest turn offs is the apparent differences between the mil and civy ACR. Forget functionality, it PISSES me off. Its a peasent mentality I will never agree with.

 

What differences?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've heard something about them offering the aluminum receiver (the Remington/MIL version), but I'm sure that's just internet rumor.

Still, you're right, Shane. What really gets under my skin is that the issues I've heard of are purely quality control issues, not even so much hardware. I've heard of bolts not being completely fastened, and those same bolts not having any type of redundant measures (like Loctite). And in another situation, Bushmaster QC people told a user who was having issues explicitly to never use 5.56 because the rifle was never designed for it.

 

Whether it can or cannot run 5.56 is another argument. The fact that Bushmaster would go out of their way to say it and/or make a product, that was targeted to a pretty specific market, and knowingly screw said market is appalling... and then, of course, price the rifle for 2500+ (MSRP)?! I mean, lets be honest, the rifle isn't priced over 2K because its the best thing since sliced bread. If I wanted to overpay for something no where near its value, I would just buy a George Foreman Grill (and even then, those things can be useful).

 

A realistic price would be around 1200, and most of that would be because of the barrel changing feature. If Remington released the actual hard-use version, sure, I could understand a $2000 price tag... but for what BM is offering? Its lunacy.

 

ETA:

Bushmaster (civilian version): http://www.bushmaster.com/acr/

Remington (military/LEO version): http://www.remingtonmilitary.com/RemingtonMilitary/Firearms/Carbines/ACR.aspx

 

A lot of people are confused about why two different manufacturers (and then throw Magpul into the mix) are producing the ACR-- and its because Bushmaster is handling the civilian sales/versions, while Remington is handling the military/LEO sales (or that's what it boils down too).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't get it... Magpul should have licensed the design to multiple manufacturers. This way there would be more competition between them to create better quality, and also sort through teething issues quickly.

 

Plus, they coulda made a ton of money too... But with Remington/Bushmaster owning the rights, it's a Monpoly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

" a design flaw which could result in multiple rounds firing continuously when the trigger is pulled. "

Why would i want to have it fixed? It's something I've been wanting for a very long time. :D

$20,000 in Fines and 10 years in the FPIMAP should be reason enough. :icon_rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

$20,000 in Fines and 10 years in the FPIMAP should be reason enough. :icon_rolleyes:

For the record, I don't own an ACR, i have an M4. Lol

actually,I guess it would be of no use anywhere in jersey. Once the range Officer hears something that sounds like a fully automatic weapon, it would raise a flag.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • So, as I interpret things, you get a hit on #1. It says nothing about feeding from said magazine, just that the magazine attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip. And it is attached. Was this what was considered when it was written? 100% no. However, this is NJ and I don't think they would give you an inch when as written it covers it in plain english.  #2 would be a hard yes if you put a threaded barrel on your setup, so I'd not do that.  #3... well it's not a shroud, but it does allow you to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned. Shroud is ill defined, and it could be argued to partially enshroud the barrel from the bottom. I would bet cash money that the AG would gladly say that second part there is to clarify the intent of the law and that since you can do that, you violated the stated intent of the law. 
    • I don't know why we ( NJ gun organizations ) have not yet filed a lawsuit on "duty to inform"  A clear violation of the constitution 5th and probably 4th.  Maybe this guys lawyer will and get that charge dropped.  what other right do you need to inform a law enforcement officer of.    are you required to identify as a republican or democrat during an encounter, and by the way,  what constitutes an encounter.  voluntary? involuntary?   time to get this one knocked down. come on ANJRPC stop waiting for court decisions and go on the attack.
    • Right, each location will have a different set of Repeater frequencies you can use in your area.  You could also just have 2 sets of CHIRP files ready to go and make sure you have the ability to program them quickly in a SHTF situation.  Maybe dedicate at least one radio for each location with specific programming, and then when you get there you can re-program the radios you take with you with the programming specific to that location.   More expensive radios have the ability to program them via your phone app and BT connection.  
×
×
  • Create New...