Jump to content
Jon

Your/you're, Its/it's, There/their/they're, To/too, Then/than, Lose/loose, And More!

Recommended Posts

CLICK ME!!!

 

This link is conveniently located in my signature line, as well!

 

 

Your beeting a dead horse, since their are folks who will continue too exercise they're rights and type as they sea fit, even if it bothers you to.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Their going to spell it the way they like irregardless.

 

In the spirit of this thread, awesome!

That nonsense word is like nails on a blackboard to my ears. An old teacher supervisor boss of mine used the word incessantly. I actually made this my outgoing answering message message "Irregardless is not a word. Look it up. It makes you sound ignorant". The stuttering message she left one time made it worth it. I didn't stay at that job very long.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with you j0n. I've more or less given up expecting the correct versions of those anymore, but the lose/loose thing drives me nuts. Do they not teach spelling and vocabulary in school anymore?

 

I see posts from my high school friends on facebook. If we were taught spelling 30 years ago, my classmates have forgotten it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the spirit of this thread, awesome!

That nonsense word is like nails on a blackboard to my ears. An old teacher supervisor boss of mine used the word incessantly. I actually made this my outgoing answering message message "Irregardless is not a word. Look it up. It makes you sound ignorant". The stuttering message she left one time made it worth it. I didn't stay at that job very long.

 

 

My wife's co-worker used to say "agreeance." Like "that's what we will do as long as we are all in agreeance"

 

She's a writer so it drove her insane.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My wife's co-worker used to say "agreeance." Like "that's what we will do as long as we are all in agreeance"

 

She's a writer so it drove her insane.

 

Why? It's a word.

 

Main Entry: agreeance Part of Speech: n Definition: the act of agreeing Example: Usage of the site constitutes agreeance with these terms. Usage: considered obsolete and a bastardization of 'agreement'

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/agreeance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why? It's a word.

 

 

http://dictionary.re...rowse/agreeance

 

crap that thing posted. I take the train home read the forum on my iPhone. I meant to write "it drove her insane until she found out it was a real word." :girlwacko:

 

I guess I hit send in my pocket while I was getting off the train.

 

All the time I write posts on the train, hit send and get up only to have it disappear into the ether and this one posts. sheesh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Getting a non-threaded barrel is easy.  I'd definitely consider it as having a form of a shroud for #3.  The question is does it actually violate #1?  If so is there another chassis option that does not have mag holder VFG?    
    • So, as I interpret things, you get a hit on #1. It says nothing about feeding from said magazine, just that the magazine attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip. And it is attached. Was this what was considered when it was written? 100% no. However, this is NJ and I don't think they would give you an inch when as written it covers it in plain english.  #2 would be a hard yes if you put a threaded barrel on your setup, so I'd not do that.  #3... well it's not a shroud, but it does allow you to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned. Shroud is ill defined, and it could be argued to partially enshroud the barrel from the bottom. I would bet cash money that the AG would gladly say that second part there is to clarify the intent of the law and that since you can do that, you violated the stated intent of the law. 
    • I don't know why we ( NJ gun organizations ) have not yet filed a lawsuit on "duty to inform"  A clear violation of the constitution 5th and probably 4th.  Maybe this guys lawyer will and get that charge dropped.  what other right do you need to inform a law enforcement officer of.    are you required to identify as a republican or democrat during an encounter, and by the way,  what constitutes an encounter.  voluntary? involuntary?   time to get this one knocked down. come on ANJRPC stop waiting for court decisions and go on the attack.
    • Right, each location will have a different set of Repeater frequencies you can use in your area.  You could also just have 2 sets of CHIRP files ready to go and make sure you have the ability to program them quickly in a SHTF situation.  Maybe dedicate at least one radio for each location with specific programming, and then when you get there you can re-program the radios you take with you with the programming specific to that location.   More expensive radios have the ability to program them via your phone app and BT connection.  
×
×
  • Create New...