Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thanks for the AAR on your night. Glad all worked out in the end.

 

One thing I caught reading your story is you didn't mention any outside flood light that yopu could have put on to either scare away or better spot light a possible intruder.

 

You might want to add one or two to yoru place to spot ligh tyoru front door adn driveway and maybe even have one pointed towards yoru Sister in-laws house as well just incase.

 

Also maybe look into one of those after market security video system for your home as well.

 

Thats exactly what my brother said.

I'm gonna talk to my electrician buddy and get some of those super bright halogens that give you a sunburn. Maybe hook up a siren like they had at the concentration camps too !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah - I highly recommend you invest in a biometric safe.

 

One fault with that. It needs a clean "read" from what I understand.

 

Worse case scenario, you've already got blood on your hands (literally) and the safe doesn't read your finger swipe. Time wasted trying to get it open.

 

Get the finger slots, with push buttons. Allows you to program any number of finger strikes to pop it open with slim margin of error.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, pump action one hand and light in the other. 3 steps after I got the gun out of the safe I'm wishing i had a pimped out tactical SG.

Big pile of fail, lol, nicely put.

 

no need to get excessive just do what works..

 

if I still had my pump I would save my lunch money and get the surefire pump with the built in light..

 

they are crazy expensive.. but solid.. no wires to get hung up on.. and surefire makes good stuff..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm replying late but imo the only reason y u don't "have one in the chamber" is so that when it's time to "have one in the chamber", the invading party can hear that beautiful *click clack*. Also blue line fish stated that the us vs them thing needs to stop then clearly said that EVERYONE is a threat until the situation is resolved... contradictory much??????????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the invading party can hear that beautiful *click clack*.

 

The only sound I want them to hear is the blood dripping from the wounds, the rushing in their ears as their blood pressure drops and the howling of the demons that are coming to drag their black soul to hell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am really getting sick of the us vs them. It seems that this is the first response to anything associated with cops. It's a matter of safety. Everybody is a threat until the situation is over.

 

Although I can understand the reasoning for this, I don't know that I completely agree with this mentality, and the words, actions, and tone of the peace officer may or may not have been adhering to a higher standard.

 

As I said, previously, it is a very good thing that we can call on our uniformed citizens when we need them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the reason everyone is treated like a threat until the issues is diffused is because you have NO idea who is who and what is what.. I am not LEO and I have the same thought process.... "oh its a women I hope she is ok.." you lower the gun to approach her.. when out of the bushes comes a baseball bat to the face... all people are capable of criminal activity.. and until you are %100 sure they are not a threat.. then I just assume %100 that they ARE a threat.. so that I would be prepared for the worst..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the reason everyone is treated like a threat until the issues is diffused is because you have NO idea who is who and what is what.. I am not LEO and I have the same thought process.... "oh its a women I hope she is ok.." you lower the gun to approach her.. when out of the bushes comes a baseball bat to the face... all people are capable of criminal activity.. and until you are %100 sure they are not a threat.. then I just assume %100 that they ARE a threat.. so that I would be prepared for the worst..

 

And that is OK, as long as its within the law. You have to admit, though, part of being a police officer is showing good customer service/bedside manner. In my interactions, I would say its roughly 60-40 with the 60 being good to acceptable customer service. Anyway, this is NOT what this threads about and I shouldn't have brought it up. And, I can attribute abruptness, etc. by a peace officer as being a reaction during a stressful situation. I just wish the law would also take that into consideration more often with private citizens.

 

Silent Service, one of my neighbor's homes is up for sale, in case you want to leave Bill behind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Similar Content

    • By Jim Hartman
      Here is the letter I am sending to Gov. Christie. Any recommendations for improvement?
       
      Dear Governor Christie;

      I am writing you this letter today to let you know of my deep concerns with the recently approved assembly bills. In light of the mass murder of innocent children in Connecticut, there needs to be serious discussion about measures that can be put in place to provide more comprehensive assistance to mental health patients. As it stands, there are few alternatives for families with mentally ill relatives. These neoteric gun laws serve no purpose other than than that of a red herring, meant to divert the public from the real issues at hand.
      The law abiding gun owners in NJ have, time and time again, been victimized by unnecessary and unconstitutional laws that do nothing to prevent crime. The gun owners in NJ are the single most responsible group of people in the state. Background checks include two references, employment verification, mental health checks and waiting periods. After passing all of that, you are required to get another check at the time of each purchase through the NICS system. Anyone approved for purchasing a gun in NJ has been meticulously scrutinized. There are so many layers of gun laws that the police don't even know what is legal.
      Most guns used in NJ crimes come from another state. The current bills will require disposal of guns and magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. After 90 days, failure to comply with these laws will result in a felony and carry a possible prison sentence. Most handguns used for home protection hold more than 10 rounds. NJ already prohibits so called assault firearms and magazines that hold more than 15 rounds. How would this additional law prevent more tragedies?
      Prohibiting law abiding people from purchasing ammunition outside of NJ will only cause a burden on the forthright people of our state and will be a clear violation of the commerce clause. Online retailers require a copy of FID card and photo ID to purchase. This will again cause unnecessary and unwarranted hardship on the competitive gun users in our state.
      The bottom line is that we have too many gun laws already in NJ. All of the laws currently in the legislature will only make law abiding citizens felons, and will also give an advantage to the criminals. I am an ardent supporter of you; I donated to your campaign and I did all I could to get friends and family to elect you. You promised us you wouldn't pass any more gun laws. I hope you keep your promise, as I will no longer support you in the future if you fail to veto any feel-good, knee-jerk bills that arrive on your desk.

      Thank You,
       
       
      James Hartman

    • By BossyMossy
      Hi Everybody,
       
      I am new to this forum and to gun ownership in general. I've always been interested in firearms but was scared away by New Jersey's stringent firearm laws. Finally, within this past year, i took the plunge and submitted an application for my FID. I received it a few months ago and immediately purchased a 12 gauge for trap shooting. I've been having a blast. However, I've been looking into acquiring a rifle that i can plink around on at the range. I'm very interested in purchasing an SKS. I've read that they can be had for cheap and i love the look and feel of them. I had a chance to shoot one that my coworker owns and since then i've been sold. That being said, my coworker is not a New Jersey resident.
       
      My question is... Being a New Jersey resident, how can i go about purchasing an SKS? I noticed that a great deal of them are offered online but obviously that is a no-no in NJ. Also, they do not seem to be offered in any of the local gun stores, more than likely due to their age. I'd rather not have to travel out of state.
       
      Any suggestions? I'd rather not have to travel out-of-state to a PA gun show or something.
       
      Best,
       
      Michael
  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...