Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
vozella

Illegal Magazines

Recommended Posts

Not personally BUT I was at Brick Armory once and a guy had 30 rd. mags for his AR and the the owner (forgot his name) came in to check on the shooters, noticed this dude, left and then returned with "backup" (another employee) and asked the guy about it. Turns out the guy's a LEO and the AR was dept. issued... all good in the end :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You frequently see people being charged with oversize magazines as add-on charges to other gun crimes. So you'll hear about someone being arrested with an automatic rifle, two other illegal guns, and oversize magazines. It usually adds to other charges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not personally BUT I was at Brick Armory once and a guy had 30 rd. mags for his AR and the the owner (forgot his name) came in to check on the shooters, noticed this dude, left and then returned with "backup" (another employee) and asked the guy about it. Turns out the guy's a LEO and the AR was dept. issued... all good in the end :D

 

A few months ago, a guy had a M&P 15-22 with the standard magazine (forgot how much it holds), I told him those where not legal here. He said that he's from Virginia, and doesn't plan on getting pulled over anytime soon. Okay, see ya later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

problem with this it's so hard to tell which are blocked. So many mags look hi-cap and so many look like a regular 10 or 15. Like mention above this is usually an add on crime. point in case why sacrifice your gun rights for a couple extra rounds by mags and connecter atleast your get 20 :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

off topic but a couple years back I believe at a state range in the mid-west a marine's semi fire bushmaster shot off two rounds and he was arrested for having a class III. dont remember how it actually turned out. if I have time for you when I get into work Ill post it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So.... because his gun was able to fire in burst mode..... his gun was malfunctioning?

 

http://209.200.109.169/arfcom/Olofson/O ... iorari.pdf

 

Is it really an issue, or this guy was trying to pull wool over everyone's eyes?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So.... because his gun was able to fire in burst mode..... his gun was malfunctioning?

 

http://209.200.109.169/arfcom/Olofson/O ... iorari.pdf

 

Is it really an issue, or this guy was trying to pull wool over everyone's eyes?

 

Nah, just the government screwing another citizen. Automatic weapons really shouldn't be illegal anyways... but little chance that'll happen.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There has to be more to this story. He was probably doing something else and the gov't couldn't stick him with the real crime so the gov't charged him with this BS. It happens ALL THE TIME. You just don't know about it cause the gov't is not allowed to disclose unless its public record and the bad guy will NEVER tell the truth. He just wants your sympathy. ie gov't took my guns, etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe he was also charging people $50 to assemble their AR parts, which is manufacturing according to the ATF. He should have just shut up instead of telling averyone on AR15.com what was going on. That was probably admissable as evidence as well.

 

I don't disagree that if the gov't has it out for you that they're going to get you, but if you're going to make it easy for them whether out of stupidity or just plain ignorance...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure about people getting checked/arrested at a range, Im sure its happened before. But there have been plenty of charges in NJ for hi cap mags. Many arise out of another gun charge, i.e., Muffin with allegedly selling auto weapon to leo in NJ, or domestic violence arrests that precipitate weapons seizure and hi cap mag charges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this the case you were talking about?

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WEAPONS OF CHOICE

 

'Broken gun' conviction upheld by court

Rules government does not need to provide evidence to defendant

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: May 04, 2009

10:05 pm Eastern

 

 

By Bob Unruh

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Ignoring the Duty To Inform, this is definately going to be used against us CCW holders during the current court hearings.  Drinking and randomly shooting a gun out the window does not paint a good picture for CCW holders.   
    • Getting a non-threaded barrel is easy.  I'd definitely consider it as having a form of a shroud for #3.  The question is does it actually violate #1?  If so is there another chassis option that does not have mag holder VFG?    
    • So, as I interpret things, you get a hit on #1. It says nothing about feeding from said magazine, just that the magazine attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip. And it is attached. Was this what was considered when it was written? 100% no. However, this is NJ and I don't think they would give you an inch when as written it covers it in plain english.  #2 would be a hard yes if you put a threaded barrel on your setup, so I'd not do that.  #3... well it's not a shroud, but it does allow you to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned. Shroud is ill defined, and it could be argued to partially enshroud the barrel from the bottom. I would bet cash money that the AG would gladly say that second part there is to clarify the intent of the law and that since you can do that, you violated the stated intent of the law. 
    • I don't know why we ( NJ gun organizations ) have not yet filed a lawsuit on "duty to inform"  A clear violation of the constitution 5th and probably 4th.  Maybe this guys lawyer will and get that charge dropped.  what other right do you need to inform a law enforcement officer of.    are you required to identify as a republican or democrat during an encounter, and by the way,  what constitutes an encounter.  voluntary? involuntary?   time to get this one knocked down. come on ANJRPC stop waiting for court decisions and go on the attack.
×
×
  • Create New...