Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
n4p226r

So. What guns are in this pic

Recommended Posts

From left to right

KRISS Carbine .45 Legal

M-1 Garand Legal

Springfield 1903 Legal

Benelli Super-90 NOT Legal (Pistol Grip on a Semi Shotgun + Assault Weapon)

HK SL-8 (???) Legal

AR-15 Legal

pellet Rifle Legal

Ar-15 Legal

Ak-variant Legal

Unknown

The AR's both appeared to have Muzzle Brakes, and the Ak appeared to have either a Crowned bbl, or a thread protector (I Assume) pinned on.

 

Handguns: 1 Glock at least 4 1911's, 1 revolver, 1 unknown, what APPEARS to be an FN Five7N, and an AR lower.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought this be made legal by permanently blocking the magazine to 6 rounds? Or is the pistol grip too evil no matter what?

 

2C:39-1

 

(3)tab.gifA semi-automatic shotgun with either a magazine capacity exceeding six rounds, a pistol grip, or a folding stock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

a shame had to be an idiot. seems like the guns were cool enough as is. why go against the law and add high cap magazines.

 

 

question, he was arrested for having hollowpoints. is that charge only because he commited an other gun related crime with posession of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought this be made legal by permanently blocking the magazine to 6 rounds? Or is the pistol grip too evil no matter what?

Pistol grip is an automatic no-no cost me a SWEET deal on a High Standard model 10 a few years back too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The second from the left looks to be an M1A, not a Garand. Unless my eyes are going which could be as I am getting older :)

You are correct, I was wrong, i was looking at the reciever area and didnt bother looking at the gas system.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no such thing as "high capacity magazine"

 

It's a political term, coined by politicians 20 years ago to vilify an entire class of firearms. When these guns were designed they were meant to used, 20, 30, 35, etc. round magazines.

 

That would make a 30-round AR-15 magazine a standard capacity magazine.

 

5, 10, and 15 round magazines being used in a gun designed for 20 and 30 round magazines would make them low capacity magazines.

 

Here in NJ, we are only allowed to have low capacity magazines. At his house, police found standard capacity magazines.

 

If you could go back in a time machine to 1980-something, walk into a gun shop and ask for a "high capacity magazine" the guy behind the counter would probably look at you funny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no such thing as "high capacity magazine"

 

It's a political term, coined by politicians 20 years ago to vilify an entire class of firearms. When these guns were designed they were meant to used, 20, 30, 35, etc. round magazines.

 

That would make a 30-round AR-15 magazine a standard capacity magazine.

 

5, 10, and 15 round magazines being used in a gun designed for 20 and 30 round magazines would make them low capacity magazines.

 

Here in NJ, we are only allowed to have low capacity magazines. At his house, police found standard capacity magazines.

 

If you could go back in a time machine to 1980-something, walk into a gun shop and ask for a "high capacity magazine" the guy behind the counter would probably look at you funny.

 

 

Excellent point bro, right on the money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

true.

 

but what about the g17 with the 33 rd mag. would that be a high capacity magazine? since it was designed with 17rds in mind

 

Yes, if the gun was designed for 17 rounds, then a 33 round magazine for that gun would be a high capacity magazine. The standard would be the 17 and the 15's you're stuck with here in NJ (or whatever size they are here) are the low capacity magazines.

 

Some guns are intended to use even larger drums/belts. For example, a 75 round drum in an RPK would be a standard capacity magazine, as that is the device the gun was designed to feed from. Putting a 30 round magazine in an RPK would be using a low capacity magazine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a kiddie porn case. The Prosecutor will use the weapons as leverage. Can't prove the initial charge, he's a sick F--K. Go for the easier one, the mags and hollowpoints.

 

+1000

 

The guns are a leverage issue.

 

I pretty sure that anyone involved with kiddie porn has a mental defect which would make any gun ownership illegal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gun penalties are out of proportion with the offense ala the guy in prison for 7 years because he had a unloaded gun locked in his trunk.

Prosecuter will probably offer a deal to have S***bag plead guilty to the kiddie porn offense so he won't be charged with the gun charges.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gun penalties are out of proportion with the offense

 

I noticed the same thing too, somewhat recently actually. I tend to read various states' gun laws when I'm really, really bored. Maybe 6 months ago, I was amazed to find out that in most states, things like carrying a gun without a permit, or improper transportation of one, are usually misdemeanors or even just fines the first offense or two. NJ is one of only a ridiculous handful where the mere non-violent act of having a gun on you, or not locked the right way, is a straight up felony with huge jail sentences.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I noticed the same thing too, somewhat recently actually. I tend to read various states' gun laws when I'm really, really bored. Maybe 6 months ago, I was amazed to find out that in most states, things like carrying a gun without a permit, or improper transportation of one, are usually misdemeanors or even just fines the first offense or two. NJ is one of only a ridiculous handful where the mere non-violent act of having a gun on you, or not locked the right way, is a straight up felony with huge jail sentences.

 

 

In NJ, you get less time in jail if your a convicted felon shooting someone with an illegaly obtained gun, than an honest citizen violating a stupid transportation law.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...