Jump to content
TheWombat

Exactly how do you debate with this type of childish behaviour?

Recommended Posts

When I saw this it just shows some of the silliness that is in the media at the moment in terms of debates. Whether anti-2A or pro-2A I can't see how anyone can say this is a mature debate?

 

http://youtu.be/x6FV_BPX8tA

 

Oh well - at least it is only 2 minutes 12 seconds long

 

TheWombat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's no debating with irrationality. The very nature of a debate assumes that both parties will back their points with facts and logic in a (somewhat) respectful manner. The moment someone starts acting like they're fresh out of goddamn first grade, they pretty much lose.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One argument in favor of the map was they were concerned which house their children might go to to play with other kids, a better map for that purpose- show us all the houses with people who wouldnt qualify to buy a gun, I would worry more about them, that would be a big list indeed.

 

That information is probably protected under NY state law! LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One argument in favor of the map was they were concerned which house their children might go to to play with other kids, a better map for that purpose- show us all the houses with people who wouldnt qualify to buy a gun, I would worry more about them, that would be a big list indeed.

 

You aint kidding, it absolutely blows my mind the mentality of these people... " oh , listing the registrered gun owners is for OUR public saftey"....

 

.... you mean the people who have gone through a rigirious background check for an FID, and background checks every time they make a purchase..... and PASS this background check....

 

we arent the ones you should be afraid of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's impossible to debate with someone who refuses to accept reason.

 

I just ran some quick numbers of FBI murder weapon statistics 2007-2011.

 

Average % of murders by weapon 2007-2011

Handgun - 48.05%

Rifle - 2.72%

Shotgun - 2.97%

Knives/Other Cutting tools - 13.07%

Blunt Objects - 4.07%

Hands/Feet - 5.90%

 

Assuming every single rifle and every single shotgun used was an "assault weapon," you are more likely to be beaten to death than killed with an assault weapon (5.69% vs 5.90%). You are more than twice as likely to be stabbed to death than killed with any rifle or any shotgun combined (5.69% vs 13.07%, 2.3x). You are more likely to be killed with a blunt object, which are often weapons of opportunity, than any shotgun, or any rifle..

 

This is beyond asinine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One argument in favor of the map was they were concerned which house their children might go to to play with other kids, a better map for that purpose- show us all the houses with people who wouldnt qualify to buy a gun, I would worry more about them, that would be a big list indeed.

 

I love this. I'll be stealing that one.

 

 

ON ething that I just keep shaking my head over, It is so wierd to here all these anti-gun people saying "well no, I have no problem with people owning handguns, of course not."

 

For those of us of a certain age that is just a jaw dropping reversal of things we heard growing up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"NANANANANANANA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU, NANANANANANANANA!"

 

I hope someone makes a meme out of that crap. What a joke.

 

I always wondered why Sean keeps bringing him back then I realized his actions are priceless. What better way to highlight their ignorance and child-like behavior than to put it on full display.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Ignoring the Duty To Inform, this is definately going to be used against us CCW holders during the current court hearings.  Drinking and randomly shooting a gun out the window does not paint a good picture for CCW holders.   
    • Getting a non-threaded barrel is easy.  I'd definitely consider it as having a form of a shroud for #3.  The question is does it actually violate #1?  If so is there another chassis option that does not have mag holder VFG?    
    • So, as I interpret things, you get a hit on #1. It says nothing about feeding from said magazine, just that the magazine attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip. And it is attached. Was this what was considered when it was written? 100% no. However, this is NJ and I don't think they would give you an inch when as written it covers it in plain english.  #2 would be a hard yes if you put a threaded barrel on your setup, so I'd not do that.  #3... well it's not a shroud, but it does allow you to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned. Shroud is ill defined, and it could be argued to partially enshroud the barrel from the bottom. I would bet cash money that the AG would gladly say that second part there is to clarify the intent of the law and that since you can do that, you violated the stated intent of the law. 
    • I don't know why we ( NJ gun organizations ) have not yet filed a lawsuit on "duty to inform"  A clear violation of the constitution 5th and probably 4th.  Maybe this guys lawyer will and get that charge dropped.  what other right do you need to inform a law enforcement officer of.    are you required to identify as a republican or democrat during an encounter, and by the way,  what constitutes an encounter.  voluntary? involuntary?   time to get this one knocked down. come on ANJRPC stop waiting for court decisions and go on the attack.
×
×
  • Create New...