Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
MandM

HK (MR556 specifically) pricing craziness...

Recommended Posts

So Sgt Toadette started a thread about a silly-vilian HK G36 coming out that's not an SL8. Somewhere in that thread we mentioned the HK MR556 and how there's some not good reviews/experiences with them etc. I didn't want to deviate too far from the G36 clone... so... new thread.

 

/rant on

 

Yesterday I got an email from Midway... they're selling a MR556 complete upper (just the upper) for $1,800+!!! (On sale!)

 

I put my AR together from high quality parts, and don't think I spent that much on the whole dang rifle. (Not including optic.)

 

Is that crazy... or is it just me? 

 

From what I've read...  I don't want one anyway... but geez... that price seems outrageous.

 

/rant off

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a decent price for that upper and if it's your cup of tea I'd jump on it. I just think it's rediculous that you can buy an entire LWRC rifle for the money.

 

I'm sure it will work, just not any better than any other quality piston gun. Just be aware of some non standard part issues. I never researched the rifle in much depth, just enough to know that I'd rather have something else. I'm sure you could find some good info on the hkpro forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with MP5's is there is simply no parts in country to service them. That's why many are seeing the buzz saw and being replaced by AR's. As far as the HK AR, I simply am not familiar with the civy variant or if all the parts except the happy switch are the same. But in a full mil spec version, I believe their piston system to be superior to most others. BUT as most know, Im not a fan of the retrofit. Id prefer a rifle designed as a piston gun from the getgo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I was in the market for a piston AR, I would have a very, very tough time justifying the MR556. That should tell you something.

Got that right. Big fan of the pistols. But I'm in the market for a REPR.... Had 2nd thoughts about the HK variant. MR756? After I saw the price then if I'm not mistaken, requires proprietary mags, I said screw it. So I'll stay focused on the REPR to keep my M6 some company.

I'd love to have an HK in 556 or 762.... But they are off their rockers.

 

 

Sent from my iPad 2 using T2 Pro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The REPR doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If you are going for a precision semi, many others are more accurate at similar price points for the weight penalty. If your after rugged and reliable something like the SCAR17 is considerably less weight and about as accurate. If you just like it, ignore my input :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The MR556 doesn't require proprietary mags, it just doesn't work with PMAGs. Any mag that is built to STANAG specs should be fine. I wouldn't blame HK for the fact that Magpul built mags out of spec. There's plenty of other reasons not to buy the MR556, though.

 

He's referring to the MR762. That rifle will only accept HK's proprietary .308/7.62 mags.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, thanx Jon for the clarification.... :)

 

Shane, as far as the REPR.... I would venture to say that without being able to toy with others that may be in the same class, I'm stuck on the REPR. This is based on my M6 which blows away the average AR IMHO... I put it up against my BM at the range and the groupings with a red dot where much tighter than the BM with the red dot. Otherwise, I have nothing else to base it on. The SCAR, which I also like got good ratings too, but in the end, the REPR prevailed from what I saw. Besides, I vowed not to buy a SCAR as long as I'm in this CRAP STATE just to have it butchered. What we have to do with ARs is bad enough... but I'd want a SCAR 'AS IS' someday... :)

 

He's referring to the MR762. That rifle will only accept HK's proprietary .308/7.62 mags.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The REPR doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If you are going for a precision semi, many others are more accurate at similar price points for the weight penalty. If your after rugged and reliable something like the SCAR17 is considerably less weight and about as accurate. If you just like it, ignore my input :)

A 17 with a Handl Defense lower is the way to fly, IMO.  I keep meaning to convert one of the ones in inventory to title 2 (really, really simple) but haven't gotten around to it.  Work is keeping me from doing the fun stuff!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Similar Content

    • By Maksim
      I get emails from Davidson's and other distributors.  This week they are having a special on HK P30L in 40 S&W for $469.  Assume + shipping + dealer markup.

      Also seems like a deal? on M9A3.

      Also, the Walther Creed is $249.  This was actually a really nice gun when I got to play with it at Shot Show.  Surely better than the lower end Smiths, etc.

       
    • By ECsandstar
      After quite a while and plenty of talking about it(as some of you know, and are tired of hearing about my yearn for a VP9) i finally have an HK VP9 LE model of my own. I cant wait to put some rounds through it. Its is just a beauty. Makes me instantly want a collection of them. Long story short i am very happy!
       
      However...I was going through the manual and running through the info in the case when I came across the typical "spent casing" pouch. Its dated for a month out! As in July 2015! I found this weird. For anyone else who has purchased a VP9 or an HK pistol, do you know when the pouch/ casing was dated? Was the date pre or post you getting it? I dont imagine its of any real significance either way, just weird.
       
      Anyone else had any similar experiences with any firearm, HK or not?
       
       
    • By PD2K
      Was chatting with a buddy of mine at the range, who owns both pistols, and prefers the Walther PPQ just slightly over H&K VP9. Never shooting the H&K VP9, I was surprised by his observation due to H&K's rep. But his view was just that: people love VP9 over PPQ due to the "hype" and "rep" of H&K. Full disclosure: he is a H&K fan and loves his VP9.
       
      Question to those who shot both: forget brand name, which do you prefer and why?
    • By mikka1
      (From GrabAGun promo emails)
       
      Seems to be a Good price on P30S, all others sell it starting $800+, Buds sells it at $840 or so.
      $750 + $6 shipping seems to be very tempting. If only I had permits in hand...
       
       
      Heckler and Koch P30S V3 9mm DA/SA 15+1 Safety
      HK P30 Semi-automatic SA-DA Full 9MM 3.85 Polymer Black 15Rd 2 Mags Fired Case Safety and Ambi Decocker 3 Dot M730903S-A5
       
      http://grabagun.com/catalog/product/view/id/88047
    • By macPSU
      I'm considering picking up an HK USC 45 in the near future.  In stock form, it doesn't really do a whole lot for me, but the UMP conversion is enticing.  I don't think it's a very practical purchase, but I like the uniqueness and I've wanted to add a pistol caliber carbine to my collection.
       
      Anyway, my question is if anyone here owns a UMP conversion and if so, where did you have the conversion and compliance work done?  I'd rather give a local gunsmith the business if they're experienced with the conversion, rather than send it across the country.  I'd need to have the USC receiver milled out a bit to accept UMP magazines, the UMP stock pinned, and magazines blocked, while maintaining 922r compliance.  I'm hoping someone in NJ is familiar with and willing to handle the work.
  • Posts

    • There is no press that you can just sit on a table.  They need to be bolted down securely so there is no flexing.  They do make complete stands that work good too.  I agree with the fact that the Lee Classic turret is a great starter press.  You cant realize the full speed of a progressive when you are first starting off.  You NEED to go SLOW until you learn the ropes.
    • Single stage will have a tighter tolerance, and you have more control over the process.  Progressives are for bulk range fodder. Every experienced reloader gave me the same advice when I was getting into the hobby, start with single stage, so you can truly understand the reloading process and what you have to do on your end to make great ammo.  Once you have mastered that, then you can think about a progressive. If you want to add a bit of convenience to your single stage reloading, a turret press (rotates the dies, not the shell plate) is probably better suited.  It is still effectively a single stage operation, but you don't have to keep removing and remounting dies. I'm not sure what you mean by this.  Whatever press you get, it will have to be secured to a work surface in some way.  I bought an inexpensive 20"x20" work surface from HF to permanently mount my shotshell press on.  It is mounted very sturdy and durable with the added 1/2" hardwood plank and extra big washers. If you haven't already, you should check out some of the reloading channels on YT.  Ultimate Reloader is one of my faves, but there are scores of others with great advice.  See it in action.
    • The 550 is not a true progressive as it does not auto index, right? I'm in the process of selling myself on a XL750. For a starter press, you can't go far wrong with a Lee Classic Turret. It is cheap, auto indexes, and swapping calibers is easy. NB. If you go for a manually indexed press and work multiple cartridges at once, be particularly careful to monitor the powder drop stage to avoid no powder or double charges. With an auto indexing press the risk is way lower.
    • The Dillon 550's are amazing machines.  Plenty fast, and while there are faster machines in the Dillon lineup, the trade-off is that the faster ones take longer to change between calibers, and the caliber conversion kits are more expensive.   You can use the 550 as a single stage press, one cartridge in the shell plate at a time, rotating between the stations after each handle pull.  It's a good way to start out and gain experience. I've got a single stage press as well, used for larger rifle cartridges and the occasional oddball handgun cartridge that I don't shoot enough to justify the cost of a caliber conversion kit for the Dillon...but it sounds like those use cases aren't in your immediate future.    
    • Why is the single stage an advantage exactly? Could I not build them on the progressive? 
×
×
  • Create New...