Remington's In-Depth Response to CNBC Under Fire

[joejaxx 38]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2YFIwoZsWHk

[Maksim 1,504]

+1. there we go.

 

Media.... driven by fear or greed.

[vjf915 456]

If we had a clap smiley, I would be clapping for Remington. That response was put together very well.

[bulpup 98]

Fighting Fire with fire. Well done.

[specopsscout 26]

[JimmyAGR 54]

I'd like to see one of the so called "News Networks" air that. Maybe a Dateline exclusive Like that would ever happen

[Jon 264]

Excellent response. Well done Remington!

[bry@n 195]

well done remington.

[Malsua 1,422]

It's nice to see Remington cut through all the MSLSD BS.

 

That said, does anyone here think there is zero problems with the 700 safety system? It may be just on mis-adjusted guns or whatever but if I recall someone we know had an out of the box 700 with problems.

 

Anyone recall this thread? http://njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/13934-remington-700-misfire/page__p__184958__hl__%2Bbceagle+%2Bsafety__fromsearch__1#entry184958

[tony357 386]

yes i remember that thread.. Just seems odd to me that remington did not rebut on air..

[Cemeterys Gun Blob 165]

yes i remember that thread.. Just seems odd to me that remington did not rebut on air..

 

 

Who would air it?

[tony357 386]

Who would air it?

 

CNBC, REMINGTON REFUSED TO COMENT..

[Blcklightning 11]

Oh Jack Belk...

[joejaxx 38]

CNBC, REMINGTON REFUSED TO COMENT..

 

It is probably because they wanted to put together a detailed video like this instead of having a chopped up semi-quoted comment that the News Media would have displayed like they always do :/

[SpecialK 193]

this makes me want to go out and buy a 700 to show support for the company