BCeagle 12 Posted December 29, 2012 The Vultures descend... I am an attorney and I hate these human pieces of garbage. I hope the State says no and the Devil finds a special place in hell for him. I also blame the parents, you want to sue, dont give me this "Jane Doe" crap because you are embarrassed and dont want to be vilified, thank God you survived. http://news.yahoo.co...-065258482.html NEW HAVEN, Conn. (AP) — A New Haven attorney is asking permission to sue the state for $100 million on behalf of a student who survived the mass shooting at a Newtown school. The Hartford Courant reports (http://cour.at/Tvo5v9) that attorney Irving Pinsky filed notice Thursday with Claims Commissioner J. Paul Vance Jr. The state has immunity against most lawsuits unless permission to sue is granted. Pinsky said the 6-year-old student, identified as "Jill Doe," was in her classroom at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14 when "the horrific confrontation" with Adam Lanza came over the loudspeaker. Lanza killed 20 first grade students and six adult staffers at the school before killing himself. Pinsky said the student has been traumatized by the killings, and accused the state of failing to protect students from "foreseeable harm." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CageFighter 236 Posted December 29, 2012 just wait until an armend security guard or cop shoot an innocent student during a future school shooting. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tony357 386 Posted December 29, 2012 If Jill Doe survived she has already been rewarded, Case closed.. The little Doe will have to suck it up and earn a living like the rest of us.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueLineFish 615 Posted December 29, 2012 Absolutely disgusting but this is what our legal system has allowed. Revolving door of criminals and frivolous lawsuits. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bob B 103 Posted December 29, 2012 I think this case raises a very important question. Are schools legally responsible for the safety of the students? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueLineFish 615 Posted December 29, 2012 I think this case raises a very important question. Are schools legally responsible for the safety of the students?personally I think they are Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bob B 103 Posted December 29, 2012 personally I think they are If the courts agree, once states realize that they are libel, the idea of gun free school zones will be abandoned quickly, in favor of effective school security plans. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueLineFish 615 Posted December 29, 2012 Think about it. I am putting my child in their hands for 7 hours. How can they not be expected to keep kids safe. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ruger9 0 Posted December 29, 2012 I think this case raises a very important question. Are schools legally responsible for the safety of the students? I don't know if they ARE, or if the courts would find that they are, but they SHOULD be. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diamondd817 828 Posted December 29, 2012 Well in NJ we have an AG that insists that the 2A does not apply outside the home and has said "we" (as in the State of NJ) will protect you. Would be an interesting case. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
remixer 1,645 Posted December 29, 2012 This does not surprise me a single bit.... We just came off a year long election that was run and won on the idea that you deserve other peoples money no matter the reason. If i were the parents i would sit back for a moment and think.... My child lived why is that??? Do i really want to mess with karma??? Sure i might win 10 million dollars but i might end up with 12 million in medical expenses... What is this kids emotional trama really worth maybe at most 5 years of paid psychologists or therapy. Just goes to show you how this country has become a population of scum. I'm waiting for the suit that claims a child has their arm injured when a teacher was covering him or her up and they sue the teacher personally. Nothing pisses off most regular folks then seeing shit like this.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tony357 386 Posted December 29, 2012 They are suing over the warning they heard over the intercom.. apparently the shooter did not enter Jill Does class room according to the article.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BCeagle 12 Posted December 29, 2012 I don't know if they ARE, or if the courts would find that they are, but they SHOULD be. Cops dont have a legal obligation to respond. I think an armed gunman goes over the responsibilities a school has. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BarkNBite 15 Posted December 29, 2012 NJ will protect you.....? Easter Bunny, Santa Clause, Jersey Devil........I believe it all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ruger9 0 Posted December 29, 2012 Cops dont have a legal obligation to respond. I think an armed gunman goes over the responsibilities a school has. I said SHOULD. So let's make it so. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Socom 19 Posted December 29, 2012 Everyone wants a freebie! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bob2222 317 Posted December 29, 2012 Well in NJ we have an AG that insists that the 2A does not apply outside the home and has said "we" (as in the State of NJ) will protect you. Would be an interesting case. Warren v. District of Columbia -- "they" have no legal obligation to protect you. http://en.wikipedia....ict_of_Columbia "They" also have no obligation to keep homicidal maniacs in institutions for the mentally ill, where they can not harm either themselves or 27 other innocent souls. Still, I imagine the lawsuits will be flying over this in the coming years. Anyone, and everyone that you can possibly imagine. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BCeagle 12 Posted December 30, 2012 I'll whip out the law school catch phrases...intervening criminal act abolishes liability. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
H.M. Murdock 0 Posted January 1, 2013 What a guy http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/01/01/connecticut-lawyer-withdraws-100m-lawsuit-over-school-massacre/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diamondd817 828 Posted January 1, 2013 Warren v. District of Columbia -- "they" have no legal obligation to protect you. http://en.wikipedia....ict_of_Columbia "They" also have no obligation to keep homicidal maniacs in institutions for the mentally ill, where they can not harm either themselves or 27 other innocent souls. Still, I imagine the lawsuits will be flying over this in the coming years. Anyone, and everyone that you can possibly imagine. I am well aware that the Supreme Court has affirmed this more than once. It is the NJ AG that is insisting that the State will protect you outside the home in NJ, hence, his basis for the denial of carry and the 2a not extending beyond the front door in NJ. This statement was just made recently by the NJ AG during the lawsuit filed againts NJ. The NJ lawsuit is being appealed to the CA3. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diamondd817 828 Posted January 1, 2013 What a guy http://www.foxnews.c...chool-massacre/ "The state attorney general said Monday there appears to be no basis to support the suit or the state's liability." Of course the CT AG is going to say this. That's why you have to sue. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tactical Turtle 11 Posted January 1, 2013 What a piece of shitt. Fcuk this guy hope he burns in hell Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hd2000fxdl 422 Posted January 4, 2013 Unfreakinbelievable. Yea that's a word... Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
exfed2002 4 Posted January 4, 2013 I think this case raises a very important question. Are schools legally responsible for the safety of the students? They used that as an excuse for why they didn't want us to drive our cars to school back in the 60's. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites