Jump to content
PD2K

Arcane NJ law prevents retired cops from carrying concealed weapon

Recommended Posts

Arthur, my friend.

Do you have any data to back up your statement" most drunk drivers make it home"

 

And as this relates to ccw, do you have any data of liscense carries accidental death rates vs that of drunk drivers.

 

These are your statements and the pretense of your current agurement. The burden of proof is on you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't even know what that means?

 

 

I think we're all on the same page then..

 

I'm still trying to figure out why you think a citizen carrying a firearm is the same as a citizen trying to play cop...

 

 

The fact is, your entire argument is based on an irrational fear of average Joe carrying a firearm. The fact is, if your opinion had any merit you would be using empirical evidence to support your position. How many average joes put the public in danger per year? How many cops put a bullet where it doesnt belong every year? We have federal cops selling guns to criminals, we have cops loosing firearms, we have trigger happy cops.... Fact is... People accept the errors for a common good... Maybe we should re-assess giving guns to cops if your goal truely is public safety.

 

Cops in this country kill people at a remarkable rate compared to others... Maybe they should learn to do the job without the weapon or at a reduced rate... It might breed better cops that don't pull a gun when a suspect farts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Are you claiming to have been in 5 gun fights?  Wow, you're a very special person!!

 

You don't need to call me out -- I'm right here.  Do you really expect me (or anyone) to provide personal information to others on an internet chat site? 

 

Look, regard me as verified credentialed or regard me as a belligerent youth - WGAS?  What difference does it make?

 

Attack my positions with valid counter arguments... if your able to -- if you're not, then concede.  Simple.

 

:good:

You continue to operate under assumptions. Im sure you aren't so illogical to draw the conclusion that the presentation of a weapon always results in a shooting. But your penchant for jumping to conclusions and speaking in absolutes makes the discussion...... tedious.

 

I called you out, you choose not to offer the least bit of validation or even a frame of reference for your position. It doesn't even need to be to me. Who would you like to validate to. Want a SWAT officer to verify your claim? Would you prefer a federal agent? I can provide any of the aforementioned to validate your certifiable's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You continue to operate under assumptions. Im sure you aren't so illogical to draw the conclusion that the presentation of a weapon always results in a shooting. But your penchant for jumping to conclusions and speaking in absolutes makes the discussion...... tedious.

 

I called you out, you choose not to offer the least bit of validation or even a frame of reference for your position. It doesn't even need to be to me. Who would you like to validate to. Want a SWAT officer to verify your claim? Would you prefer a federal agent? I can provide any of the aforementioned to validate your certifiable's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one is suggesting taking away your "right to defend yourself."  Just endangering others by using a gun in public without adequate training to perform that act.

 

Without taking a stance on an officer expressing "concern for their own safety trumps that of my safety" I will add this: a protector cannot provide protection if he is unavailable to do so. 

 

Kinda like the logic on airplane safety that says, "put on YOUR oxygen mask first, then assist others."

 

:yes:

 

 

First, response under stress can absolutely be perfected with training -- a misnomer on your part -- and likely the part of many others.

 

As far as your perception of the midwest, where "almost everyone is carrying" as not being "death traps" I would offer this logic -- most drunk drivers make it to their destination without killing someone -- is that justification for a civilized society to condone drunk driving?

 

And firearms training is not just "shooting skills" and accuracy, as many "civilians" imagine.  There is SO much more involved with carrying a firearm.

 

So, how did you survive those 5 incidents without a gun?

 

:think:

Actually that is exactly what was being suggested, not by you, and I tend to agree that proper training is essential in safely carrying a firearm. Admittedly I did not feel that way before I began taking training, and was astonished at how little I knew before, which was the trigger for seeking additional training. The sad truth is that in most cases the protector will show up after the incident has taken place, so his safety is initially compromised not by my acting in self defense, but by his reaction to my self defense. Nothing is fool proof, not training, or practice, and not a badge. Since I am indeed my own first responder, his personal sense of safety is secondary, and always will be. That does not in any way mean that I condone a shoot first attitude, it simply means that I take my safety and that of my family very seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I love how this guys thinks trained cops are like the litmus test for carrying a gun. When the fact is almost every police shooting turns into a spray and pray with little regard to where bullets end up.

 

How about the cop in NYC that shot some random dude in a dark stairwell? How on earth could that happen since he's trained?

 

And the jerkoff had the nerve to blame the gun... I guess that's what you people do.. you pass off the blame so your training isn't called into question.(I'm not referencing all LEO here, just those that think their shit don't stink)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

STOP FEEDING THE TROLL!!!!!!stop responding to it and it will go away. Everyone just ignore it for 2 weeks and it will be gone for sure. Also for stop quoting it for those of us that have it on block PLEASE!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me be clear that I am a strong proponent of training. But it would not work here. Why? Because NJ would make it a tool of denial just like they do with purchase permits. I can easily see "Yes the state run CCW class is held on wed at noon and is only available on odd months the first week of the month and the waiting list is 8 months out and growing".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

STOP FEEDING THE TROLL!!!!!!stop responding to it and it will go away. Everyone just ignore it for 2 weeks and it will be gone for sure. Also for stop quoting it for those of us that have it on block PLEASE!

I agree 100%. You get no further arguing with this troll than you would a cranberry muffin (And, yes I am a little hungry right now) stop engaging at it will fade away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree 100%. You get no further arguing with this troll than you would a cranberry muffin (And, yes I am a little hungry right now) stop engaging at it will fade away.

But it's fun. :laugh: Don't like it. Stay out of this thread.

 

I highly doubt AK has any type of LE affiliation due to statements that he has made. IMHO, most police have very little training with firearms. The academy and bi-annual qualifications is just that, QUALIFICATIONS. That is not training. As a NJ Police Training Commission Certified Firearms Instructor, I would rather rely on most of the posters in this thread than most of the LEOs that I have seen at the range.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But it's fun.[emoji23]Don't like it. Stay out of this thread.

 

I highly doubt AK has any type of LE affiliation due to statements that he has made. IMHO, most police have very little training with firearms. The academy and bi-annual qualifications is just that, QUALIFICATIONS. That is not training. As a NJ Police Training Commission Certified Firearms Instructor, I would rather rely on most of the posters in this thread than most of the LEOs that I have seen at the range.

That is EXACTLY what I said about LE qualifications once or twice a year in an earlier post to AK & he denounced what I said .......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But it's fun. :laugh: Don't like it. Stay out of this thread.

 

I highly doubt AK has any type of LE affiliation due to statements that he has made. IMHO, most police have very little training with firearms. The academy and bi-annual qualifications is just that, QUALIFICATIONS. That is not training. As a NJ Police Training Commission Certified Firearms Instructor, I would rather rely on most of the posters in this thread than most of the LEOs that I have seen at the range

 

Paul

 

I am not interested in getting into a pissing match with you. I like you and have used you as a vendor multiple times.

 

I was expressing my opinion just like you are, but thanks for telling me what to do.

 

I do agree with you  that this troll is no more a cop than I am the king of Siam. He is not being honest, therefore his input is neither valid or interesting to me. That is why  I do not engage him and have him on ignore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You continue to operate under assumptions. Im sure you aren't so illogical to draw the conclusion that the presentation of a weapon always results in a shooting. But your penchant for jumping to conclusions and speaking in absolutes makes the discussion...... tedious.

 

I called you out, you choose not to offer the least bit of validation or even a frame of reference for your position. It doesn't even need to be to me. Who would you like to validate to. Want a SWAT officer to verify your claim? Would you prefer a federal agent? I can provide any of the aforementioned to validate your certifiable's.

 

Haha!

 

Okay, I'll bite.

 

Post the names and phone number's of the "SWAT officer" and the "federal agent."

 

:lol:(swat officer)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Similar Content

    • By Frank Thomas
      Does anyone know if I can now apply for concealed carry in NJ?  Very confusing.  The form, "State of NJ - APPLICATION FOR PERMIT TO CARRY A HANDGUN..." appears to not have been updated.  As an illustrative example, there's no mention about weapons training.  And the form is dated "03/15."  So how do I apply to carry a weapon post-Supreme Court ruling?  And has anyone in NJ applied and been approved under the new Supreme Court ruling?  Thanks
    • By Ramup422
      In light of the poor ruling against the 2nd Amendment today by the 9th Circuit court, the Almeida / Tumminelli v. NJ case moves forward and will be filed at the Federal Courts in Newark on Friday, June 10th 2016 by the law firms hired to move the case forward. The 3 law firms involved are out of Pennsylvania, Mississippi and California. The details of the complaint, law firms involved and updates will all be made public for your viewing after the approval on the release of such is obtained by the lead attorney.  This case is being funded 100% by us, the laypeople (we, the people) and their supporters.  To learn more, visit the Party of Six on their FB page or at www.partyofsix.org
       
      Thank you, 
       
      Albert Almeida
       
      no quarters given
    • By Michael1776
      Michael J. Cino is the Chairman of the Constitutional Carry Coalition - we believe that "justifiable need" should be trashed - Please CALL TEN PEOPLE you know in the 5th Congressional District and ASK THEM TO VOTE FOR MICHAEL J. CINO IN THE REPUBLICAN PRIMARY JUNE 7 AgainstTheEstablishment.com
      Then ask them to CALL TEN PEOPLE THEMSELVES

      and then ask those TEN to call TEN PEOPLE to Vote for Michael J. Cino in the 5th Congressional District on June 7 - it's the only way we are going to get rid of "justifiable need" and change the gun laws in New Jersey AgainstTheEstablishment.com
    • By NJGF
      Violent Home Invasion
      Case Illustrates Threat Posed by Gangs
       
      https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2016/april/violent-home-invasion/violent-home-invasion?utm_campaign=email-Immediate&utm_medium=email&utm_source=fbi-top-stories&utm_content=537558
       
      "Violent gangs pose a significant threat to communities throughout the United States. You don’t have to live in South Central Los Angeles or Chicago’s inner city to feel the impact of gang violence, as a recent case from Washington state illustrates."
       
      "Around 9:30 p.m., a 66-year-old Lakewood man answered a knock at his door and was confronted by the three youths, who forced their way into the home. The gang members had picked the wrong house, but that didn’t matter to them. What happened next was 20 minutes of terror for an innocent couple"
       
      "...they kicked down the locked bedroom door where the couple had barricaded themselves behind their bed. Confronted again by the attackers, the man fired two shots, hitting 19-year-old Taijon Vorhees both times.
       
      At that point, all three robbers fled and drove away"
    • By Midwest
      MO lawmaker wants gun owners to consider retreat over firing
       
      http://www.kctv5.com/story/24856794/mo-lawmaker-wants-gun-owners-to-consider-retreat-over-firing
       
      Missouri lawmaker wants gun owners to retreat instead of shooting to defend. Rep Randy Dunn proposed HB 1940 http://www.house.mo.gov/billtracking/bills141/billpdf/intro/HB1940I.PDF  The bill would require a person to retreat when facing danger.
       
       
      Attorney Kevin Jamison strongly opposes the bill.
      "I'm appalled. This is showing more regard for home invaders than home owners," he said. "This is an absurd piece of legislation. It should be given the contempt it deserves."
  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...