Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/13/2018 in all areas

  1. 5 points
  2. 3 points
    Get your blatant optimism out of here. There is no place for that on these forums
  3. 3 points
    i hate to sound like a dick...but this sounds like a thread started by someone with an axe to grind(for whatever reason) that should've simply contacted the involved parties directly. this isn't farcebook here.
  4. 3 points
    The only thing the 3rd circuit is going to do before 12-10 is rule on the appeal of the injunction. They don't have the case proper yet. For them to not rule on behalf on injunctive relief would be shocking. Even the 9th permitted injunctive relief despite doing their best to uphold the mag ban there. IMO the 3rd and 2nd are more apt to ignore law and precedent wholesale (the 9th at least likes to pretend they exist within the structure of the law, even if it is with very selective hearing and reading). Denying injunctive relief would be a deep cut to legal tradition and ethics here, so it'd be a BIG kind of FU for the 3rd to give NJ gun owners. I'm not comfortable calling it either way because IMO as a whole the 2nd and 3rd represent some of the most unsupported legal reasoning I have seen. Even so, all things considered, I'd have to ask WTF they are thinking if they deny it. Why? 1) NJ courts won't protect us. 2) Why dick with gun owners and screw your reputation up as well as damage a quality judicial tool by being dicks when you can just have patience and rule fuck you later at the actual trial? 3) With a change of SCOTUS composition, why risk risk being publicly declared morons twice rather than once? 4) Even without the SCOTUS change, why risk looking like petty scumbags when you could just have patience and be officially declared as correct for your judicial decision when the appeal hits your court? 5) Why miss an opportunity to whip it out and measure it when you can't lose. NJ courts aren't exactly respected. Yup. The courts will. As for "law" they will do what they always do. Which is largely fail to enforce anything on the books in a meaningful way. They will say they are right until they are smacked down by a higher court. At that point I suspect if they lose they will strike it down and try to pass something slightly different and equally oppressive. If SCOTUS is on our side, ehe question is how many times will the 3rd circuit choose to jump off that bridge with these shitweasels.
  5. 2 points
    you have it wrong, his rationale is admitted bias is going to make for an overturn in the higher courts. The worst thing these libs could do is have this go to higher federal courts to be struck down. They have overplayed their hand. I commend the groups fighting this, need to donate more
  6. 2 points
    Modern armor might work. After Gulf War 1 I saw some Abrams coming back through Bayonne that had taken what I thought unsurvivable hits. However, they were still running and fully functional.
  7. 2 points
    I'll say it. Get ready for the five round law the day after they affirm 10 is not an infringement. Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
  8. 2 points
  9. 2 points
    Who are you and what's your interest on this?
  10. 2 points
    With Kavanaugh now on SCOTUS, this could be the case that frees us from Trenton's Tyranny after the Third sides with the state's illogical logic.
  11. 2 points
  12. 2 points
    Said the tour guide on the USS New Jersey: "We can hit Trenton from here" Replied my buddy: "So what's stopping you??"
  13. 1 point
    We've already seen judges in the fed circuit question if mag restrictions are really a safety concern seeing as how more than half of 'mass shooting's are with capacities less than the federal limit. Now with Trump putting in more judges at the circuit level and SC, the libs have got an uphill battle to prove. Once this is ruled at that level, we'll see the restrictions on brakes etc next brought to the court.
  14. 1 point
    Chobham and reactive armor are two older technologies that have proven themselves. The M1 has been around over 35 years and there's been many improvements since then.
  15. 1 point
    Bingo and sure as hell isnt social media -
  16. 1 point
    they'll be to 5 by the time we manage to get rid of murphy at the end of this term. if the inmates in this fucking state vote him in for a 2nd term, we'll lose semi-auto by the end of that.
  17. 1 point
    If anyone is looking: Big Tex Outdoors - https://bigtexoutdoors.com/ Is having a sale on Glock OEM mags including OEM 9mm 10 rounders. Big Tex Outdoors is a superb company. I have met Ike, the owner. He is a great kid and a staunch supporter of the 2A. Buy with confidence.
  18. 1 point
    Yea, I remember seeing them at MOTBY while I was there for a short spell as well... Since, they’ve improved on those defection screens. (Don’t remember official name).... Think they came up with something else for protection too but can’t recall. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  19. 1 point
  20. 1 point
    Back in stock again! I just ordered 4 for G19. get them while they hot and don't forget the code! 4x OEM Glock 10rd Mags - Glock 19 for $18.50 each Discounts : $-18.50 USD Subtotal : $55.50 USD Shipping : $4.99 USD Total : $60.49 USD
  21. 1 point
    Believe that Ant was the successful bidder in the bankruptcy sale with bank financing and this should not impact a late 2017 or 1st quarter 2019 opening of the new facility
  22. 1 point
  23. 1 point
    1000 mile range? Not tomorrow but maybe not impossible. Gerald Bull was getting fantastic ranges from artillery in the 60s. Too bad for him he got pissed at the US and Canada and wound up selling his services to Sadaam Hussein resulting in his assassination by the Mosaad in the early 90s. Time will tell what technology will develop. The H&K VP70 was pretty much ignored by most in its nearly 20 years of production. Who wanted a polymer frame pistol? The Glock 17 was around for about 3 years before it was imported to the US. I guess Glock got it right. The US actually tried this in the 70s IIRC. I saw some prototypes that were in storage at Picatinny Arsenal. They worked well in tank to tank combat I was told. This was going to be the answer so we could take on the greater numbers of Soviet tanks in Europe. There was one factor only realized late in their development that killed the idea. Things like electronic countermeasures were designed into these unmanned tanks. What killed the idea was there was no way to protect them from the Russian private with a RPG. He could turn that unmanned tank into a static pillbox that could easily be destroyed by direct fire weapons or artillery.
  24. 1 point
    NJ will do what NJ wants. Federal rules and laws mean nothing to the politicians and judges. They think NJ is its own country.
  25. 1 point
  26. 1 point
    Not looking good fellas...Disgraceful, cronies', treat illegal's better than American's who own gun's (many who served in the US-Armed-Forces) . But it is what it is.
  27. 1 point
    Well, Trenton already looks like it has been shelled...
  28. 1 point
    Caraj is on point. Bankruptcy is a dirty game but can be lucrative if played properly.
  29. 1 point
    Unfortunately for you guys I am no longer with the company, I put my 2 weeks in and my last day was this past Friday. Primary factor was the commute plus some other small things. Good company but not what I need in my life right now I'm back at my family's business where I can bank as much money before the wedding so I can get out of state and work for another firearm company with my experience Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
  30. 1 point
    More so than your average cab driver, convenience store worker, pharmacist, veterinarian, bartender, etc.? Profession should never/ever be a determining factor in application of Constitutional Rights.
  31. 1 point
    big fan of these triggers. I replaced my geisseles with the mbt's


  • Newsletter

    Want to keep up to date with all our latest news and information?
    Sign Up
×
×
  • Create New...