Jump to content
ogfarmer

National Rifle Association to sponsor NASCAR race in Texas

Recommended Posts

The National Rifle Association will sponsor the NASCAR Sprint Cup event in Texas on April 13, Texas Motor Speedway President Eddie Gossage announced Monday.

The race will be called the NRA 500 and will be run during prime time.

"NRA members and NASCAR fans love their country and everything that is good and right about America. We salute our flag, volunteer in our churches and communities, cherish our families, and we love racing." NRA Chief Executive Officer Wayne LaPierre said a video statement played for reporters at a news conference announcing the event.

The sponsorship comes as the gun rights advocacy group has been ramping up its campaign against gun control initiatives in Washington.

Just a few weeks ago, the NRA bought newspaper ads in five states and regional ads and online commercials on websites in 15 states.

The NRA spent about $350,000 on that campaign, a source familiar with it told CNN.

It's the first time the NRA has sponsored a race in NASCAR's top series. Last year, the organization sponsored a Nationwide Series race at Atlanta Motor Speedway.

The race had been promoted as the Texas 500 after the track's deal with Samsung ended last year.

"The title sponsorship costs for a Sprint Cup series race vary greatly from track to track, with variables ranging from market size to attendance, TV ratings and inventory included in the sponsorship package," Mike Zizzo, spokesman for Texas Motor Speedway, said in an e-mail.

The Sports Business Journal reported that Sprint Cup sponsorships typically sell for about $1 million per race.

"The NRA has been involved in the sport for several years and a partner of (track owner) Speedway Motorsports, Inc. for many years in various aspects, and this race entitlement is just another extension of that business relationship," Gossage said.

The winners of races at the track are often given two revolvers and a cowboy hat while taking photographs in victory lane. The fastest qualifier is awarded a shotgun.

Richard Childress, who owns several NASCAR teams, is a member of the NRA's board of directors.

The Texas Motor Speedway has more than 190,000 seats. There will be another Sprint Cup event at the track in November, sponsored by AAA.

 

 

I wonder how much this will cost

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't think they need to convince those in Texas which side of the gun debate to be on. This is for the National T.V. audience. I've already seen the state run media twisting this into an insensitivity issue! Hope it works out as a positive for our side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I dunno, but it feels like preaching to the choir.

Agreed

On one hand, it's good to work the demographic that already supports the NRA to some degree, but it also will reinforce the perception that all NRA members are hillbilly/NASCAR fans.

I'd like to see more efforts and resources toward getting "fence sitter" types converted.

Maybe an NRA sponsored ballet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A clear waste of resources and nothing more than a avenue to sign on more of the already initiated.To make an impact go the route of Red Bull or Tag Heuer and get involved in the X games or some form of extreme sports where the demographic is younger,affluent and forward thinking.

I venture maybe 75% of NASCAR fans has a firearm in his/her car,truck or camper and while I don't follow NASCAR,I have yet to hear of some wild shoot out.....as someone already stated the NRA is preaching to the choir.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Enougjh with the speculation about the effectiveness of advertising. Unless you are a marketing guy you have no idea. I am not a marketing guy but here are some facts:

 

22 percent of every TV that was on Sunday had NASCAR on. That number was staggering. Do 22 percent of households have a gun? No

 

Michael Waltrip a racing ICON had a "remember Newtown" sponsor on his car. Whoever paid him to do that didn't say "that is not our audience"

 

It's about maximum number of eyeballs period

 

EDIT. 22 percent was the Daytona 500. Don't know regular weekly viewing but I know it beats the NBA ratings regularly

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Enougjh with the speculation about the effectiveness of advertising. Unless you are a marketing guy you have no idea. I am not a marketing guy but here are some facts:

 

22 percent of every TV that was on Sunday had NASCAR on. That number was staggering. Do 22 percent of households have a gun? No

 

Michael Waltrip a racing ICON had a "remember Newtown" sponsor on his car. Whoever paid him to do that didn't say "that is not our audience"

 

It's about maximum number of eyeballs period

 

EDIT. 22 percent was the Daytona 500. Don't know regular weekly viewing but I know it beats the NBA ratings regularly

Actually it was more than 24% in some markets but solely because Danica Patrick was on pole,typically NASCAR struggles to see half of those viewers and viewership is steadily declining so as an investment do you still consider it sound?

If it was my money and I wanted to reach an audience that was not totally sold or convinced of my product and my business's integrity I would seek out those people and invest in a growing market and viewership not on the converse.

NASCAR is slowly dying and unless the rules change to encompass "Death Race" like mayhem,it will continue to fade....hardly a venue to attract new customers or change minds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Enougjh with the speculation about the effectiveness of advertising. Unless you are a marketing guy you have no idea. I am not a marketing guy but here are some facts:

 

22 percent of every TV that was on Sunday had NASCAR on. That number was staggering. Do 22 percent of households have a gun? No

 

Actually more than 22% of households have a gun. Even by less than friendly stats, individual ownership is about 32%, and household ownership is nearing 50%. There are a lot of gun owners not on the roles of the NRA.

 

Michael Waltrip a racing ICON had a "remember Newtown" sponsor on his car. Whoever paid him to do that didn't say "that is not our audience"

 

It's about maximum number of eyeballs period

 

EDIT. 22 percent was the Daytona 500. Don't know regular weekly viewing but I know it beats the NBA ratings regularly

 

Dude, MLS is about to eclipse the NBA in popularity. THat isn't saying much.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dying shmying. Is it the single most watched television event that day? If not I will shut up.

 

I am happy to see any positive message out there period. We are fighting for our lives. Why does the effort need to be qualified?

 

Someone anyone please suggest a better mass marketing message? And keep in mind most companies would probably not even accept the money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dying shmying. Is it the single most watched television event that day? If not I will shut up.

 

I am happy to see any positive message out there period. We are fighting for our lives. Why does the effort need to be qualified?

 

Someone anyone please suggest a better mass marketing message? And keep in mind most companies would probably not even accept the money

I find NASCAR fans loyalty to their sport so quaint, Yes NASCAR has a large viewership but all you have to do is google NASCAR viewership stats to find that while cyclical, it is declining rapidly and even more alarming for their management and advertizing staff,it's declining most among the ever important 18 to 34 demographic...This is the age group that exercises the most buying power for all that lite beer,snack foods and hardware stores that keeps NASCAR turning left. Even more insidious,this is the all important age group that have kids that would have been the new generation of NASCAR fans....now not to be.

So yes, NASCAR is indeed dying Sir.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMO, its smart in every way. Great exposure to possible new members who probably already own guns AND great debate by those that will be outraged by the idea and drive their views publicly and nationally. And this is coming from someone who loves racing (Indycar & F1) buts absolutely HATES Nascar! Maybe they can sponsor a car in the Indy 500 too!!! Hell, the National Guard did and isn't that really just our tax dollars being spent on an autosports luxury sponsorship that most successful corporations can't even afford??? Man, I gotta stop, I might get really going.... but all in all, as an NRA member, I am in favor!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any exposure is good exposure. Additonally, Nascar was doing fine, actually one of the highest rated sports, until they brought Nextel/Sprint into the picture. Ever since the early 2000s it has been on the decline. However, with racers like Brad Kesolowski being VERY outspoken, and Danica bringing a larger demographic to the sport I feel it will bounce back. They just need to get back to their Southern roots.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • So, as I interpret things, you get a hit on #1. It says nothing about feeding from said magazine, just that the magazine attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip. And it is attached. Was this what was considered when it was written? 100% no. However, this is NJ and I don't think they would give you an inch when as written it covers it in plain english.  #2 would be a hard yes if you put a threaded barrel on your setup, so I'd not do that.  #3... well it's not a shroud, but it does allow you to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned. Shroud is ill defined, and it could be argued to partially enshroud the barrel from the bottom. I would bet cash money that the AG would gladly say that second part there is to clarify the intent of the law and that since you can do that, you violated the stated intent of the law. 
    • I don't know why we ( NJ gun organizations ) have not yet filed a lawsuit on "duty to inform"  A clear violation of the constitution 5th and probably 4th.  Maybe this guys lawyer will and get that charge dropped.  what other right do you need to inform a law enforcement officer of.    are you required to identify as a republican or democrat during an encounter, and by the way,  what constitutes an encounter.  voluntary? involuntary?   time to get this one knocked down. come on ANJRPC stop waiting for court decisions and go on the attack.
    • Right, each location will have a different set of Repeater frequencies you can use in your area.  You could also just have 2 sets of CHIRP files ready to go and make sure you have the ability to program them quickly in a SHTF situation.  Maybe dedicate at least one radio for each location with specific programming, and then when you get there you can re-program the radios you take with you with the programming specific to that location.   More expensive radios have the ability to program them via your phone app and BT connection.  
×
×
  • Create New...