Jump to content
jm1827

New Zealand Mosque Shooting

Recommended Posts

i saw a shotgun in the beginning. he tossed that down when empty, and transitioned to a ar looking platform. he swapped mags at least 4 times. he had a weapon mounted light. looked like it was on strobe.....it fell off inside. you can see it on the floor. went back to his car and grabbed a different ar looking platform rifle with one of those screwy looking stocks. had a side by side clip on that one holding spare mag. he had shit written all over all of the firearms. i didn't see what was written, but that tells me that much like the navy yard shooter that had shit scratched into the wood on his shottie....this guy was/is a nutter.

 

this guy IS one of those in custody, isn't he?

2 minutes ago, sota said:

@1LtCAPyea but serpa's *do* suck.

i dunno man. i don't seem to have any trouble iwth mine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

However, according to a website that tracks terror attacks across the globe (thereligionofpeace.com), in the past 30 days there were 99 Islamic terror attacks in 20 countries, in which 701 people were killed and 697 injured.

Just a little perspective for rational folks to consider.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, 1LtCAP said:

i dunno man. i don't seem to have any trouble iwth mine.

Neither do I, but I keep my finger off the trigger until I need it to go bang.

2 minutes ago, xXxplosive said:

However, according to a website that tracks terror attacks across the globe (thereligionofpeace.com), in the past 30 days there were 99 Islamic terror attacks in 20 countries, in which 701 people were killed and 697 injured.

Just a little perspective for rational folks to consider.

Link?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, silverado427 said:

What firearms did the killer use in the attack.

Functioning Ones.

1 hour ago, silverado427 said:

I just watched the video. Semi automatic shotgun and two ar's. It looked like he might have some skills.

I can't believe there was no leo engagement.  That crazy bastard shot those people like a fish in a barrel.

It was very John Wick.

38 minutes ago, WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot said:

I would expect a revenge attack fairly soon on a church on Sunday morning by a lone wolf who saw what happened in NZ and wants retribution with his own manifesto.  Kinda what happened in Dallas with the BLM guy and his SKS targeting police. 

Reverge attack..... No such thing.....   Who drew first blood?

Fanatics dont need a reason

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Comment from another forum where this poster read the manifesto and gave his point of view. This poster usually knows what's going on:

....." What he says, has been said here many times.
We aren't going to vote our way out of what happening to the country.
He doesn't hate moslems, only the fact the ones who are invading the country and taking over the culture and who will eventually replace 'us'.
He talks about shooting the women and children and says they are invaders never the less, and the kids are just future invading warriors. He actually wishes the moslems well if they stay in their own country. He also says if you feel sorry for the children and women, what do you think moslems terrorists have always done and will continue to do?
He also talks about how weak most western men are, and how they are always saying the "line hasn't been crossed yet" and that we can afford to wait, or pursue peaceful means to turn this situation around.

He may not have had much education, but his writing is pretty coherent.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, xXxplosive said:

However, according to a website that tracks terror attacks across the globe (thereligionofpeace.com), in the past 30 days there were 99 Islamic terror attacks in 20 countries, in which 701 people were killed and 697 injured.

Just a little perspective for rational folks to consider.

Big time this. How long do "mainstream" islamists think this stuff can go on without coming home to roost? It clearly takes a warped, evil mind to do this on any side. But they need to clean up their own house - so far their overall responses to scores of "infidel" murders have ranged from indifference to tacit approval. 

I'm surprised this does not happen more. Rational people are getting fed up. Crazy people must be well into the red zone.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me that this guy was pretty true to "type" from what I've read about some of these mass killers. Just the act of having a 70+ page manifesto shows a real level of grandiose thinking… claiming he planned the attack for 2 years shows an extreme level of obsession... etc., etc. Typical nutter - but with some modern twists (taping and then posting the video, and tying it into current immigration trends).

Although I see the relevance of getting the real truth out there, I'm also sensitive to the fact that these documents - both the sickening video and the written manifesto - will (sadly) find their way into chat rooms where angry, disaffected young men gather... and then they will "inspire" the next generation of mass killers, much as the Columbine shooters inspired others. That is really quite sad - it's the shameful, negative side of the Internet.

But, as others have pointed out, you must admit that this is still an incredibly rare event, happening with less frequency even than other types of terrorism, and happening FAR less frequently than ordinary crime (by an order of magnitude). I'm not trying to be blasé about the horror... quite the opposite... when faced with such atrocity I feel it's even more important to remain saddened yet rational - to not give in to hysterics and politicization. Hysteria NEVER results in good choices.

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, DirtyDigz said:

Political strife and finger-pointing is *exactly* what this madman wanted.

This morning on the news, I heard that the shooters wanted the attacks to be the catalyst for the Balkanization of the USA.

I also heard (or maybe read) that they used "automatic weapons".  To me, automatic means machine guns, but I think the media or whomever it was that made the statement, was trying to conflate semi-auto with fully-auto.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It has finally come to light that this attack was Chelsea Clinton's fault:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2019/03/15/video-leftist-nyu-students-blame-chelsea-clinton-for-christchurch-terror-attack-n2543207

I'll confess I didn't see that coming, but I like it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NZ Senator who Penned the letter gets Egged by a teeanger the senator then punched the little prick in the face.

Video

https://www.foxnews.com/world/australian-senator-who-came-under-fire-for-blaming-muslim-immigration-for-shootings-punches-teen-after-he-was-egged

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Handyman said:

It has finally come to light that this attack was Chelsea Clinton's fault:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2019/03/15/video-leftist-nyu-students-blame-chelsea-clinton-for-christchurch-terror-attack-n2543207

I'll confess I didn't see that coming, but I like it.

I posted that in a different thread... SInce its a different topic... 

Should be labeled the Left's Civil War on themselves Has Begun.

 

12 hours ago, Handyman said:

It has finally come to light that this attack was Chelsea Clinton's fault:

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/timothymeads/2019/03/15/video-leftist-nyu-students-blame-chelsea-clinton-for-christchurch-terror-attack-n2543207

I'll confess I didn't see that coming, but I like it.

I like it as well... Best part was her apology. "I'm sorry you feel that way"    My answer would have been Fuck off followed by how much for a blowjob.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, remixer said:

I posted that in a different thread... SInce its a different topic... 

Should be labeled the Left's Civil War on themselves Has Begun.

Obama era has opened the door for the crazys to multiply like rabbits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, silverado427 said:

Obama era has opened the door for the crazys to multiply like rabbits.

No doubt.  The Mental sickness started after Bush V Gore....  but did not really show its ugly face until obama and really opened up after trumps election.. At this point.... I know why Uncle joe still has not decided.... I think he knows they will destroy him for not being left of left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
46 minutes ago, remixer said:

NZ Senator who Penned the letter gets Egged by a teeanger the senator then punched the little prick in the face.

Video

https://www.foxnews.com/world/australian-senator-who-came-under-fire-for-blaming-muslim-immigration-for-shootings-punches-teen-after-he-was-egged

Seems justified:

Quote

On Saturday, television cameras captured the moment when a 17-year-old boy, holding a phone, smashing an egg onto Anning’s head while he held a news conference in Melbourne. The senator immediately turned around and was seen striking the teenager in the face twice

And the article says he’s Australian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like they are already planning a ban on semi-autos:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/16/jacinda-ardern-urged-to-act-quickly-ban-semi-automatic-weapons

Without a 2A. they can just go ahead and ban guns all at once, without having to deal with the pesky incrementalism that burdens our left. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, voyager9 said:

That’s not response time. That’s the time it took them to apprehend a mobile suspect moving between two different locations.  Not actually surprising. 

aahh.....i thought that was their response time. what was the response time then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • NJGF members in chat (2)



  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • A person exercising their rights, breaking no law should not have a gun pointed at him. Care to explain how that is a strawman? The IRS is different?  How so?  A man following the law (the deputy) oh I can't be here with my gear?  okay i'll leave.  Rentacop procedes to point gun at a non threat.  And you think this is completely different?  Technically the rentacop was fired, arrested and charged.  Technically the deputy wasn't. So in your opinion anyone perceiving a threat is justified in taking lethal action against the perceived threat.   So when I see a bunch of guys in vests and black BDUs and cattying sidearms, i would be justified in pointing a gun at them?  Every Tuesday at lunch.  Funny how i am able to resist.  Man i dont even call the cops. Champion? No.  Support a person exercising their constituional protected rights absolutely. So your stance is  "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it. Unless I disagree or it might cause someone distress" My stance stops at the period.  
    • Strawman, again, really? Cant simplify it any further for you. I think you get the points made but it breaks your argument so here we go, strawman again.    You brought up the IRS guy. How about an actual response to my comments. Here they are again: But if you are referencing the guy that drew down on the local deputy at the IRS, guess what, he was actually correct that local LE does not have the authority to be armed on federal property. As I understand it that is the actual law. So now what? His judgement was poor but technically correct? Following your logic I would expect you to actually be siding with the security guard because the LAW says the deputy cannot be armed on the premises and the guard was following the law. BUT reasonable judgement would dictate no real threat existed. This is the exact flip side of wallmart. The deputy technically broke the law but was clearly not a threat. The "auditor" was within the law but one could easily articulate he looked like a threat given the totality of the circumstances and the timing of the Texas Wallmart shooting.  
    • Well isn't that great as long as you agree with the point of view all is wonderful.  If you don't agree its okay to shoot them.  
×
×
  • Create New...