2ANJ 0 Posted June 10, 2013 Jackson Police Department Arrest Made in Response to Suspicious Vehicle ReportOn Thursday June 6, 2013 at 8:53 pm, officers responded to Albany Avenue after the department had received calls about a suspicious vehicle parked in the area. It was reported that a red Mazda was parked in the area..., occupied by two subjects who may be involved in narcotics activity.Officers responded and located a 1992 Mazda Hatchback with two male occupants who appeared to be asleep. While speaking with the occupants, it was learned that they did not live in the immediate area where the car was parked. During this time, officers observed what appeared to be a rifle scope partially covered by other items in the rear hatchback of the vehicle and also what appeared to be ammunition scattered about the interior of the car.The occupants were ordered out of the vehicle and it was discovered that the driver had a hypodermic syringe on his person. During further investigation and a search of the vehicle, 7 other syringes were recovered from the vehicle along with various types of ammunition, a bolt action Mosin-Nagant 7.62 mm rifle, a Mossberg rifle and a Ruger 10/22 .22 caliber rifle and hollow point .22 cailber ammunition. The Ruger had been altered with modifications which caused it to be classified as an assault rifle under New Jersey statutes. Neither of the subjects possessed a New Jersey Firearms Identification Card to legally possess the firearms and it was determined that the property belonged to the driver of the vehicle.Arrested:Clifford Craemer 2nd, age 26 of Forked River, NJ.Mr. Craemer was charged with: Possession of Hypodermic Syringes, Improperly Transporting a Firearm, Possession of an Assault Rifle and Possession of Hollow Point Ammunition. Bail was set at $75,000.00 and he was later lodged in the Ocean County Jail. The investigation is still ongoing at this time.Residents are reminded that when they witness suspicious activity/persons, to please contact police headquarters so that available officers may be dispatched to investigate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVisHome 0 Posted June 10, 2013 I've commented on the article that they are spreading misinformation. Neither of the subjects possessed a New Jersey Firearms Identification Card to legally possess the firearms A NJ FID is NOT required to possess a firearm. And this happened literally around the corner from where I used to live at the Jackson Vet..... https://maps.google.com/maps?q=albany+ave+jackson+nj&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x89c17f22108fde11:0x60baa5f20ce29dc5,Albany+Ave,+Jackson,+NJ+08527&gl=us&ei=UjG2Ufm0Kcfc4APBzYCIBg&ved=0CC4Q8gEwAA Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
thug the bunny 0 Posted June 10, 2013 ...............I am curious as to what is so stupid.................. 1. Being a druggie and driving around with syringes, illegal unregistered firearms, and hollow points in your car. That was easy! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shane45 807 Posted June 10, 2013 Falling asleed in a car with needles and weapons all over the place doesnt sound .....smart! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheLugNutZ 21 Posted June 10, 2013 Wow i think JPD did a good job. Wondering how the 10/22 was altered to make it an "assualt rifle" 30 round mags? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
I lost my gat piece 0 Posted June 10, 2013 I've commented on the article that they are spreading misinformation. A NJ FID is NOT required to possess a firearm. I was under the impression that if you did not have an FID card you could only transport long guns directly to and from the range, a smith, or if moving. Didn't look like they were in the process of any of those things... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVisHome 0 Posted June 10, 2013 I've commented on the article that they are spreading misinformation. A NJ FID is NOT required to possess a firearm. I was under the impression that if you did not have an FID card you could only transport long guns directly to and from the range, a smith, or if moving. Didn't look like they were in the process of any of those things... That's accurate...but not they clearly said "possess" not "transport". Plus, I don't think you can transport a long gun other than for those reasons (plus hunting) even with an FID? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVisHome 0 Posted June 10, 2013 Wow i think JPD did a good job. Wondering how the 10/22 was altered to make it an "assualt rifle" 30 round mags? Doubt it. If so they probably would have jumped at the opportunity for more "hi cap" bad press. I'm guessing a folding stock or the like. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jrfly3006 42 Posted June 10, 2013 Bottom line.. Drug heads with needles and guns sleeping off a buzz are off the street., win for the Jackson community Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BlueLineFish 615 Posted June 10, 2013 Good job by the cops. Junkies and guns dont mix. Get more shitums off the streets. Too bad the legal system will let them out. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2ANJ 0 Posted June 10, 2013 ...............I am curious as to what is so stupid.................. Well I think the following two quotes sum up "..what is so stupid..." 1. Being a druggie and driving around with syringes, illegal unregistered firearms, and hollow points in your car. That was easy! Falling asleed in a car with needles and weapons all over the place doesnt sound .....smart! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackDaWack 2,895 Posted June 10, 2013 actually the possession is illegal since they do not fall under any exemption for transportation. i would say he got lucky they didn't tag that charge on.. The illegal transport infraction probably has to do with the rifles not being secured. Funny though.... i just finished lunch and was puffing on my e-cig outside of work the other day and an LEO rolled up on me... i actually almost took off cause he was in plain cloths, saw a shadow walk up to my passenger side window turn around and then walk to the back and around my car to my driver side.. i was watching the side view mirror and right before i made the decision to take off ,i saw the badge on his waist... he was a nice guy, someone called the cops on me! we got a good chuckle and i thanked him for taking the time to check out the situation, even if it was over nothing.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2ANJ 0 Posted June 10, 2013 actually the possession is illegal since they do not fall under any exemption for transportation. i would say he got lucky they didn't tag that charge on.. The illegal transport infraction probably has to do with the rifles not being secured. Or ammo not seperated, since it was all over. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
matty 810 Posted June 10, 2013 Good, the vast majority of the crime i am aware of in jax is due to druggies. Unfortunately they are probably out now or will be soon and will be back the getting high first chance they get. These idiots seem even dumber than the usual hypes, next time they may od. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JackDaWack 2,895 Posted June 10, 2013 That's accurate...but not they clearly said "possess" not "transport". Plus, I don't think you can transport a long gun other than for those reasons (plus hunting) even with an FID? With an FID, you are allowed to possess a unloaded long gun anywhere in NJ aside from restricted areas. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheDon 3 Posted June 10, 2013 1. Being a druggie and driving around with syringes, illegal unregistered firearms, and hollow points in your car. That was easy! Unregistered longguns? Only pistols are registered in NJ. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSD1026 48 Posted June 10, 2013 dude.. this is like literally around the corner from me.. that's f*cked up.. but good for the JPD for following through on it.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old Glock guy 1,127 Posted June 10, 2013 Wondering how the 10/22 was altered to make it an "assualt rifle" Perhaps it had the dreaded collapsible stock? And really, hollow point .22's? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WVisHome 0 Posted June 10, 2013 dude.. this is like literally around the corner from me.. that's f*cked up.. but good for the JPD for following through on it.. You must live on Aldrich or Church then... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
almiz111 26 Posted June 12, 2013 OK they were stupid and dumb. They broke some laws. Well that is unique! Don't really care. Who did they harm - past or present?? Maybe their mothers didn't love them. LOL. All in Jackson are now safe from evil. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KpdPipes 388 Posted June 12, 2013 actually the possession is illegal since they do not fall under any exemption for transportation. i would say he got lucky they didn't tag that charge on.. The illegal transport infraction probably has to do with the rifles not being secured. Funny though.... i just finished lunch and was puffing on my e-cig outside of work the other day and an LEO rolled up on me... i actually almost took off cause he was in plain cloths, saw a shadow walk up to my passenger side window turn around and then walk to the back and around my car to my driver side.. i was watching the side view mirror and right before i made the decision to take off ,i saw the badge on his waist... he was a nice guy, someone called the cops on me! we got a good chuckle and i thanked him for taking the time to check out the situation, even if it was over nothing.. And SOME dipstick is going to ask you if your Chains wear lightly, or insult you in some other way in 3....2.....1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2ANJ 0 Posted June 12, 2013 And SOME dipstick is going to ask you if your Chains wear lightly, or insult you in some other way in 3....2.....1 10 post later and 2 days since it was posted and no one did...sooooo carry on Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Posted July 4, 2015 With an FID, you are allowed to possess a unloaded long gun anywhere in NJ aside from restricted areas. So as long as you have a FID you can travel anyplace, anytime in NJ with an unloaded longgun? The "must be going to/from range, smith, moving" only applies to handguns? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1LtCAP 4,264 Posted July 4, 2015 1. Being a druggie and driving around with syringes, illegal unregistered firearms, and hollow points in your car. That was easy! there is no registration of long guns. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1LtCAP 4,264 Posted July 4, 2015 So as long as you have a FID you can travel anyplace, anytime in NJ with an unloaded longgun? The "must be going to/from range, smith, moving" only applies to handguns? i believe so Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kevin125 4,772 Posted July 4, 2015 Right. But the statute reads you must have been -issued- a FPID. You don't actually need it on you. But not being able to present it will probably make things more difficult for you. Personally, i try to have it on me to avoid issues. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
njJoniGuy 2,133 Posted July 4, 2015 Right. But the statute reads you must have been -issued- a FPID. You don't actually need it on you. But not being able to present it will probably make things more difficult for you. Personally, i try to have it on me to avoid issues. Or at least be able to rattle off your SBI number to the inquiring officer. Everyone DOES know their own SBI number, RIGHT??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PK90 3,573 Posted July 4, 2015 ... Everyone DOES know their own SBI number, RIGHT??? Nope. That would mean nothing to the LEO. He can't do anything with it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites