Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Has anybody discovered the G44 in .22LR G19 Gen 5 sized, yet?  Maybe it needed a steel/polymer slide, but it appears to be very cheap looking and the slide looks a little narrower.   It will take standard Glock sights but I'd be careful wit the polymer slide.  One interesting thing, for training though, is that the 10-round magazines are the exact same size as G19 mags which would be nice for training.  It is at least 1/2 pound lighter than the G19 and it can be dry fired.  The Trigger is very similar to the 9mm Glock and it has a nice trigger break.  The Trigger is a little over 5 pounds, I would guess.  It seems that this would be a good choice for new shooters.   I am not sure if Greenday could handle the recoil, though.  Seems super reliable and would be perfect to carry out in the woods (where applicable).  I want one.    

Grabagun has them for $350.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I Have watched some review videos on them. Everyone keeps saying the lower is exactly the same as a gen 5 G19.

would it be possible to just slap a G44 slide on a 19 frame?

I know just getting a G44 slide will be very hard.

not sure I would want a dedicated 22, but a “Glock conversion” slide would be nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I had a 22 conversion and sold it because I never used it.  I had always wanted to get a dedicated lower to use with it and would have if we didn't live in the Republik with the permits and all that BS.  It worked pretty well, but it had to have the correct ammo that worked with it.  In the end I sold it, as the M&P 22s were much more "useable".  I know it was an easy thing to swap out the slides, but I just didn't and consequently it never went to the range.  Having a dedicated 22, IMHO, though costly, is not much more than a conversion kit, anyway, and a better route.    And it uses the same size mags as the G19/23 so it is better for training and will go in the mag holders, etc., and not to mention that it is probably much more reliable than the conversion kits.   My only thing is that either is much lighter than the real deal.  Perhaps weights could be added somehow to the G44 to make it feel like a G19 (but then there is the recoil and on and on).  I would like to see a video comparing it to the M&P 22 Compact and 22 full-size, which are both awesome.  If it has the same trigger as the gen 5 Compacts, then it probably has a nicer trigger than the M&Ps...

The plus of a conversion kit is that with a Glock 23 and a conversion barrel (or two) you can have 3 or 4 calibers with one gun.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/18/2020 at 7:48 AM, Gunnz said:

I Have watched some review videos on them. Everyone keeps saying the lower is exactly the same as a gen 5 G19.

would it be possible to just slap a G44 slide on a 19 frame?

I know just getting a G44 slide will be very hard.

not sure I would want a dedicated 22, but a “Glock conversion” slide would be nice.

Unfortunately the frame and slide on the G44 is not interchangeable with other Glocks.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting theory on the Kaboom from another forum:

Now I am no engineer, but I think it might be an issue with the barrel.

I was wondering how they were getting this gun to run on some of the cheaper ammos.
I figured the were choking the barrel to try and bump up the chamber pressures.
And it looks like I was only half right.

I yanked one of my .22lr bullets (just the lead) and shoved it down the barrel with a cleaning rod, just to see what was going on. And then measured it.
It looks like the barrel is outside Saami specs for .22lr.

Saami calls for .217 Bore and .222 Groove.
And the G44 measured .212 Bore and .222 Groove

Which means with a .2255 diameter bullet (Saami spec) it is doing a .013 press the full length of the bullet.
And is .005 out of traditional specs.
I know they have their own barrel profile, but squeezing a .2255 bullet down a .212 hole is a problem no matter how you slice it.

So what I think is happening is that they are over pressuring the chamber then the breach is opening a little and then it will blow out all the way around.

Needless to say, I don’t think there is going to be a quick fix for the thing.

Extra high pressure on a poly slide = bad day that the range.

I am glad no one has gotten hurt.

hlr11Dy.jpg
https://www.ar15.com/forums/Handguns/Glock-44-kaboom-Update-Glock-response-In-OP/13-193065/?page=4
  • Informative 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought one online for $350.  Still sitting at Monmouth arms.  Hard to get out with 3 kids.

hopefully it’s not a lemon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have sold 4 so far - 3 owners report the gun eats anything you feed it and no hick-ups.

That being said, no reports of and slide issues, but i will say the return spring is heavy for a .22, more like a G19 and I thought for sure there would be issues with cycling but apparently not....................

As for Kaboom, If I read it right, only two or three have had issues, but many sites reporting the same ones - no?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Amazing, the world's most reliable gun/design/manufacturer and they fuck up a 22.

In other news, the new Taurus 22 semi auto is killing it.

So let me get this straight.  Taurus makes a better gun than Glock?

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Glock's trajectory isn't very good, lately.  Guess I will stick with my M&P 22.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, JT Custom Guns said:

We have sold 4 so far - 3 owners report the gun eats anything you feed it and no hick-ups.

That being said, no reports of and slide issues, but i will say the return spring is heavy for a .22, more like a G19 and I thought for sure there would be issues with cycling but apparently not....................

As for Kaboom, If I read it right, only two or three have had issues, but many sites reporting the same ones - no?

 

Yes, I think it's the same two or three that are getting talked about, so it's not like there's a mass-failure event happening.

Since it's a Glock I think ANY malfunctions/kabooms are going to get a lot of attention.

So far the vast majority of the feedback is positive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Ray Ray said:

Amazing, the world's most reliable gun/design/manufacturer and they fuck up a 22.

In other news, the new Taurus 22 semi auto is killing it.

So let me get this straight.  Taurus makes a better gun than Glock?

Taurus TX22 was named 2019 Handgun of the Year by the editors of Guns & Ammo magazine.  That being said - the G42X/G43 came out in 2019 too... :taunt:

  • Agree 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Took my G44 to the range tonight and only shot cheap 22LR ammo.

winchester bulk- had  3 malfunctions out of 100+ rounds 
1 Failure to feed (first round of a mag)

2 stove pipes

remington golden bullets- 100% reliable and I shot over 200 rounds of it.

only positive experiences so far. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good review of G44 as well as TX-22 on Military Arms Channel.

Based on what I have seen I would go for the TX-22 , better  price point, warranty good etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, SJG said:

Good review of G44 as well as TX-22 on Military Arms Channel.

Based on what I have seen I would go for the TX-22 , better  price point, warranty good etc.

I was going to ask if anyone had experience comparing them, because if they are close, the Taurus is about half the price of the Glock.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just picked up a couple permits with the intent of purchasing a 22LR pistol, the G44 was the leading contender but looking at some of the reviews and post above it looks like it might have issues with some of the 22 bulk ammo. Viewing the Bud’s website the TX22 is  sold as 16+1 and 10+1  so now for the dumb question of the day. Are the mags interchangeable?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • NJGunForums Web Banner Ad May 2020.jpg

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • I have recently updated (clean install) to Windows 10 Pro from 7.  This PC is a desktop without a touchscreen, is not on a domain, the user account is a full administrator account, not the default limited "administrator" account, and the user account is a local account.  On at least Windows 2000, XP, Vista, 7, Server 2003, and Server 2008, when users are required to enter CTRL ALT DEL to log in/unlock, and a screensaver is active when trying to unlock the PC, pressing CTRL ALT DEL will immediately deactivate the screensaver and bring up the password prompt.  On Windows 10, same scenario, pressing CTRL ALT DEL only deactivates the screensaver, acting like simply any other key press and only showing the lock screen, forcing users to press CTRL ALT DEL a second time to get the password prompt. Besides the fact that Microsoft, in their infinite wisdom, constantly "improves" "features" by making them worse or more annoying, am I missing something?  I just want CTRL ALT DEL to work as it has for the last 20 years - pressing any key should instantly deactivate the screensaver, and CTRL ALT DEL should immediately bring up the password prompt on a locked PC.  Netplwiz > Require users to press CTRL ALT DEL - checked GPEdit > Do not display the lock screen - Enabled or disabled has had no effect, have not found any other relevant settings Screen Saver Settings - On Resume, display login screen - checked (no difference if unchecked) Don't think I've done anything in regedit that would have any effect on this. Settings>Personalization>Lock Screen > Show lock screen  background picture on the sign-in screen set to "off" It is possible I've missed or messed with something in "Settings" somewhere, but nothing stands out in my memory.   So is this just a new "feature" I have to retrain 20 years worth of habits, or is there some stupid setting I am missing?  Google has been utterly useless so far.
    • The new jl can fit 35's stock. Don't even need a lift.  My 2014 required 2" of lift and flat fenders. ROCK Krawler springs and tetraflex trackbars plus their upgraded steering links. I stayed low CG and spent the money on full belly skid system from rock hard 4x4. 
    • I have a 2016 Jeep JK unlimited and love it, even more than all the pickup trucks I’ve owned. Being able to lock things up with the hardtop also played a role in that. Plus being able to take the top and doors off is golden, not to mention the true off-road capabilities 
    • I have owned nothing but jeeps.  If you've never owned a wrangler and just want something to have fun with you'll be happy.  If you're looking for a daily driver or commuter vehicle, get a Kia.  
    • Posted today on their FB page ... We had our final inspections today. We have to fix a few small things but we will be ready for re-inspection early next week. After that just waiting on our governor....
×
×
  • Create New...