What Will SCOTUS Do

[ryan_j 0]

The problem with that us the 9th was operating on a pretty finite timeline. If I understand it right, all the options are back on the table, and it can really drag out. Their record for this is 12 years.

I don't think they're watching for a final decision from the 9 th, just waiting for gore to respond to the motions to intervene and en banc. Gura is saying that Peruta is a done deal and the court likely wants agreement on this from sheriff gore (who by the way is a republican, just like Chris Christie).

[revenger 473]

(who by the way is a republican, just like Chris Christie)   Ha Ha,   that's pretty funny.         Chris Christie  a republican.

[voyager9 3,434]

They are most likely watching the 9th. I predict relist for a couple more weeks then when gore responds in the 9th we get a grant.

I know what I won't be doing: refreshing this site at 9:30 Monday am, and 9:31, 32, 35, 45.. Oh, who am I kidding.

[mipafox 438]

I know what I won't be doing: refreshing this site at 9:30 Monday am, and 9:31, 32, 35, 45.. Oh, who am I kidding.

I said I wouldn't anymore the last time. But I probably will.

[jm1827 284]

I said I wouldn't anymore the last time. But I probably will.

Yep- just like the rest of us!

[quikz 34]

I predict yet another RE-LIST.

 

Yep...Watch.

[Steve_G 51]

T minus 4 hours until the re-list.

[mipafox 438]

I predict yet another RE-LIST.

 

Yep...Watch.

Me, too

[Alex V 99]

Cooooooooooome Oooooooooon Summary Reversal,  Cooooooooooome Oooooooooon Summary Reversal, Cooooooooooome Oooooooooon Summary Reversal,

 

SHIT! Re-List lol

[Reddog87 0]

12min to relist

[mipafox 438]

Cooooooooooome Oooooooooon Summary Reversal,  Cooooooooooome Oooooooooon Summary Reversal, Cooooooooooome Oooooooooon Summary Reversal,

 

SHIT! Re-List lol

from your keyboard to God's monitor.

 

12min to relist

Cut it out.

[springfieldxds 0]

denied!!!!!

[mipafox 438]

Holy crap!

[Mr.Stu 1,922]

How does this make any sense? The circuits are split. How can the law be different in NJ vs CA?

 

Sent from my SCH-I800 using Tapatalk 2

 

 

[springfieldxds 0]

no where to go from here guys, scotus has officially given up on the 2nd amendment

[Vlad G 345]

That's damn odd.

[Jfoster99 80]

I justice system screwed up... This makes no sense...

[springfieldxds 0]

the justice system is dead today, as of today you can move to another state and have more rights granted to you under the bill of rights than other states 

[remixer 1,645]

can you post an official news report of this?

[TR20 47]

denied!!!!!

would you please post the link that shows it denied? 

Thanks

[mipafox 438]

 

can you post an official news report of this?

 

 

 

would you please post the link that shows it denied? 

Thanks

 

 

Orders are not up. There is live blogging from the press room.

 

http://live.scotusblog.com/Event/Live_blog_of_orders_and_opinions__May_5_2014

[TR20 47]

Thanks....

[Spartiati 63]

Orders not listed on Supreme Court site.  Where are you seeing this?

[springfieldxds 0]

http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/drake-v-jerejian/

 

here you go

[PDM 91]

There is a time to admit defeat.  I think this is it.  I know Peruta is still percolating, but I highly doubt the reason they denied Drake is because they are waiting for Peruta.  There is no better case than Drake out there.  I believe that they had two or three votes for cert, and Scalia was trying to find a 4th but couldn't.  That is the only logical explanation.  Despite the circuit split, despite the illogic and cavalier attitude of the third circuit in Drake, the Supreme Court denied this case.  Why?  Because they don't want to deal with the Second Amendment anymore.  After silence for over 70 years, we had two major 2A cases in 2008 and 2010.  McDonald was as much about federalism and the 14th amendment as it was about the Second.  I am firmly convinced that most of the justices simply don't want to deal with the 2A any further, and particularly don't want to get involved in the issue of carrying outside the home. 

 

We are on our own in NJ.  As many other states become more conservative -- Republicans are taking over state legislatures in many states and currently control more than half -- NJ is sliding the other way.  A 10 rd mag capacity restriction will pass, and may or may not be vetoed by Christie.  Even if he does veto it, it (or a 5 round limit) will be back and will pass in a few years when Fulop or Sweeney is governor.  The cities in this state -- AC, Trenton, Newark, Jersey City, Trenton and Patterson -- are all festering, welfare cesspools and they will continue to dominate political discourse in this state and guaranty a solid progressive Democrat majority.  There is no culture or tradition of gun ownership in NJ, and despite the valiant efforts of many, we won't be able to stem that tide sufficiently to make a difference at the ballot box.  Think about it.  10% of NJ citizens are gun owners.  How difficult will it be to increase that number to 20%?  Virtually impossible, and even if we do it still won't make a difference.

 

Unfortunately, those are the facts as I see them.  Time to face reality.

[n4p226r 105]

http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/drake-v-jerejian/

 

here you go

that doesn't say anything yet. 

[Vlad G 345]

Or work damn hard to change the state. There is never a total loss until the day you die.

[springfieldxds 0]

that doesn't say anything yet. 

read the top next to where it says the case name 

[springfieldxds 0]

Drake v. Jerejian

 Petition for certiorari denied on May 5, 2014

[TR20 47]

I see nothing from the blog dated today - only April 28th.

I'll wait for the SCOTUS orders before I cringe in pain.