Tallday 10 Posted June 20, 2014 Call Gov. Christie to VETO A2006/S993 @ 609-292-6000 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
boo 6 Posted June 20, 2014 I just called and they were far more polite and professional than I was expecting. But then again, I had low expecations Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JT Custom Guns 958 Posted June 20, 2014 I called - they again, were very polite! Just wish I had his cell phone number................. lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Teky0101 6 Posted June 20, 2014 How much longer do we have for him to veto it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HBecwithFn7 296 Posted June 20, 2014 How much longer do we have for him to veto it? 07/07/2014 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jm1827 284 Posted June 20, 2014 I just called as well Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shane45 807 Posted June 20, 2014 I called, as for others they were polite. There have been a ton of calls. Don't let up right to the last day!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
boo 6 Posted June 20, 2014 What suprised me is she asked to clarify my position as if she wanted to be sure she was recording it correctly. I was expecting more of a "kthxbai" type response by now. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtd771 18 Posted June 20, 2014 Called and polite as well. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Theron 5 Posted June 20, 2014 Done. Polite lady. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Newtonian 453 Posted June 20, 2014 Did somebody remove my post? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HBecwithFn7 296 Posted June 20, 2014 Well, CC was busy today, apparently. Chris Christie courts the Religious Right. at "Faith Freedom Summit." I don't know, precisely what this means. It might mean he's still putting out feelers, but we'll see. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
67gtonut 847 Posted June 20, 2014 Did somebody remove my post? Yes.... I did.... Rude and uncalled for.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
chris327 30 Posted June 20, 2014 Ive been calling and never had an unpleasant experience they are always very polite on the phone. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Newtonian 453 Posted June 20, 2014 Yes.... I did.... Rude and uncalled for.... It was neither rude nor uncalled for. It's called HUMOR. Nothing worse than you'd hear on the Tonight Show. Too bad for people with no sense of humor. Hey why don't you give me a second strike? Or did you? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
vladtepes 1,060 Posted June 22, 2014 07/07/2014 this has gone far closer to the wire than I expected.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
45Doll 5,881 Posted June 22, 2014 July 3 at 5:00 PM. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HBecwithFn7 296 Posted June 22, 2014 this has gone far closer to the wire than I expected.. Well, either he's waiting until the legislature goes on vacation for the 4th of July to veto, or he's going to let it lapse and pass automatically. I would have thought that if he wanted to "sign into law," he'd have done it by now. I can't believe he hasn't made a decision yet... What, is he still waiting on the "best deal possible?" I also wonder if he's thinking that if he lets it "lapse into law" it won't have the same political effects as if he actively "signs into law..." Not from my perspective.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
70gto 142 Posted June 22, 2014 For what its worth, letting it lapse into law is being just as culpable as signing it himself, no excuse for me at least. I will call Monday and get at least 3 more to call. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSD1026 48 Posted June 22, 2014 this has gone far closer to the wire than I expected.. i disagree.. i expected nothing less. He will not show his cards too early.. longer it goes on, the less people remember it.. news faded with time. if he vetoed it right away, the Dems would have been all over it.. wait a while, let it fade, and while the pro 2A people are paying attention, everyone else is gone on to something else at this time. then he vetoes it, and the pro 2A people applaud the veto, and it causes a minor stir with the anti;s (who expect him to veto it anyway).. at least, thats how i see it.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HBecwithFn7 296 Posted June 22, 2014 i disagree.. i expected nothing less. He will not show his cards too early.. longer it goes on, the less people remember it.. news faded with time. if he vetoed it right away, the Dems would have been all over it.. wait a while, let it fade, and while the pro 2A people are paying attention, everyone else is gone on to something else at this time. then he vetoes it, and the pro 2A people applaud the veto, and it causes a minor stir with the anti;s (who expect him to veto it anyway).. at least, thats how i see it.. Let us all truly hope that's how *he* sees it.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Reddog87 0 Posted June 22, 2014 No one likes a man of inaction. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSD1026 48 Posted June 22, 2014 No one likes a man of inaction. Christie is anything but a man of inaction. Everything he does is calculated. If he hasnt vetoed it yet, its been for a reason. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
voyager9 3,437 Posted June 22, 2014 Christie is anything but a man of inaction. Everything he does is calculated. If he hasnt vetoed it yet, its been for a reason. On the flip side: if he hasn't signed it yet it us for a reason. My opinion is there is more to be gained from waiting and veto vs waiting and sign. If was truly for this, he could sign right away and take advantage of existing wave of media attention. Waiting to veto lets this wave subside before he acts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
voyager9 3,437 Posted June 22, 2014 Anyone remember how long he waited to veto the bills last year? I thought he waited a while to veto the big one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jrfly3006 42 Posted June 22, 2014 Only the end result means anything...people dont care if he takes 3 or 30 days Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Wolfy 51 Posted June 22, 2014 Best bet is for out of state family and friends to contact the gov and let him know he will never make it through the primaries if he allows this to become law . Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Underdog 1,593 Posted June 22, 2014 If he vetos it, can he do it on the 4th? OR will that be after the time limit? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
voyager9 3,437 Posted June 22, 2014 If he vetos it, can he do it on the 4th? OR will that be after the time limit? It's before the limit, but I believe the state offices are closed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
raz-0 1,259 Posted June 22, 2014 Well, either he's waiting until the legislature goes on vacation for the 4th of July to veto, or he's going to let it lapse and pass automatically. I would have thought that if he wanted to "sign into law," he'd have done it by now. I can't believe he hasn't made a decision yet... What, is he still waiting on the "best deal possible?" I also wonder if he's thinking that if he lets it "lapse into law" it won't have the same political effects as if he actively "signs into law..." Not from my perspective.... It's budget time. Sitting on it keeps it from becoming a negotiating point with budget issues? Then you get to bury any feigned outrage from the Ds in the holiday weekend. That's the theory anyway. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites