Introductions
Welcome to the forums, care to introduce yourself?
1,651 topics in this forum
-
- 16 replies
- 928 views
-
- 9 replies
- 787 views
-
- 18 replies
- 1,206 views
-
- 21 replies
- 1,442 views
-
- 10 replies
- 881 views
-
- 18 replies
- 1,128 views
-
- 6 replies
- 1,479 views
-
- 25 replies
- 2,186 views
-
- 10 replies
- 975 views
-
- 32 replies
- 2,505 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1,101 views
-
- 25 replies
- 1,789 views
-
- 12 replies
- 991 views
-
- 18 replies
- 1,345 views
-
- 10 replies
- 830 views
-
- 15 replies
- 1,234 views
-
- 14 replies
- 1,561 views
-
- 14 replies
- 900 views
-
- 11 replies
- 921 views
-
- 15 replies
- 1,598 views
-
- 23 replies
- 1,731 views
-
- 7 replies
- 1,030 views
-
- 21 replies
- 2,264 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1,449 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1,778 views
-
Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items
-
Topics
-
-
-
Supporting Vendors
-
-
Posts
-
Ignoring the Duty To Inform, this is definately going to be used against us CCW holders during the current court hearings. Drinking and randomly shooting a gun out the window does not paint a good picture for CCW holders. -
Getting a non-threaded barrel is easy. I'd definitely consider it as having a form of a shroud for #3. The question is does it actually violate #1? If so is there another chassis option that does not have mag holder VFG?
-
So, as I interpret things, you get a hit on #1. It says nothing about feeding from said magazine, just that the magazine attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip. And it is attached. Was this what was considered when it was written? 100% no. However, this is NJ and I don't think they would give you an inch when as written it covers it in plain english. #2 would be a hard yes if you put a threaded barrel on your setup, so I'd not do that. #3... well it's not a shroud, but it does allow you to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned. Shroud is ill defined, and it could be argued to partially enshroud the barrel from the bottom. I would bet cash money that the AG would gladly say that second part there is to clarify the intent of the law and that since you can do that, you violated the stated intent of the law. -
-
I don't know why we ( NJ gun organizations ) have not yet filed a lawsuit on "duty to inform" A clear violation of the constitution 5th and probably 4th. Maybe this guys lawyer will and get that charge dropped. what other right do you need to inform a law enforcement officer of. are you required to identify as a republican or democrat during an encounter, and by the way, what constitutes an encounter. voluntary? involuntary? time to get this one knocked down. come on ANJRPC stop waiting for court decisions and go on the attack.
-
-
