Jump to content
Celraysoda

Revolver...which one?

Recommended Posts

S&W 686 hands down

 

then you can shoot both calibers

 

Both calibers in the same cylinder...didn't know that. I will check it out!

 

-Thanks for the info.

 

It only works one way.

 

You can shoot .38spl in a .357 mag gun. But you can't shoot .357 mag out of a .38spl gun.

 

If you shoot .38spl out of a .357, just remember to clean your cylinder so you don't get a powder ring :)

 

Happy hunting

 

 

damn tim, your too fast

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a GP100. The trigger was not as smooth out of the box as I would like, but after some shooting, I feel it's smoothing out ... close to agreeable.

 

Built like a tank and I like the balance. I did handle and shoot a 686 (used of course) and didn't want to spend the extra money. I am not a revolver expert anyway. YMMV.

 

I may take the GP100 to a gunsmith to see what additional trigger smoothness can be had, or I may open up the innards and tinker ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the Taurus M605 and I love it. Good fit and finish. And it is really accurate for a 2 inch barrel. Ive only had it for a month or so but it has been nothing but a joy to shoot. It wont be my last Taurus revolver. Here are some pics with the new Hogue Mono grips I got for it.

 

Picture028-2.jpg

Picture038-2.jpg

Picture031-1.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a revolver fan, i have the S&W 686, ruger redhawk,blackhawk and taurus 608.

 

one thing i can say is that the rankings are all close they are all quality handguns. i am favorible to the 686 because of it's grip. the taurus 608 is a very good gun but the grip is a tad wide this gun is an 8 shot 357 and i purchased it used here on the forums.

if it were me i would handle some of them before purchasing to see which one suits you, the blackhawk is cool, it brings back the old west but loading and unloading takes time as each round is individualy loaded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Kenw had some trouble with his Taurus...had to send it back but I believe it's A-ok now.

 

I've had zero trouble with my Snubbie S&W 638.

 

I've owned a number of Ruger revolvers in the 80s and never had any issues with them.

 

The 686s sure look nice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Taurus shoots like a dream. There was a headspace issue, and the cylinder would jam, but it's all better now, and the gun is accurate and comfortable. I like the Smith Pro, and will probably get one in the future, but the Taurus was my first revolver and I didn't want to drop too much money on something I wasn't sure I'd like to shoot. Cleaning the revolvers is pain, though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bought a new Taurus 38 for IDPA use. It jammed, locked up and spilt bullets so it was sent back. After they fixed it I have not had any issues. I'm happy with it now but I don't like having to send a new gun bact to the manufacturer. I don't know if I'd do it again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have a permit burning a hole in my pocket and have been looking at revolvers.

 

Anybody have any suggestions? I would prefer either 38 special or 357 mag.

 

I hear that taurus received some less than favorable reviews.

 

What are you planning to do with it? Any decision should consider this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I say Ruger GP100, PRE-LOCK S&W 686 or 586, Ruger SP101 in that order!

No lawyer lock Smiths for me! ;)

Yeah I agree with the lock thing,it's real ugly. I have a S&W 642 and I love it but the hole in the side of it sux. I have removed the lock internally but haven't picked up the plug yet to completely remove it. Get one without the lock.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where the round enters the barrel it looks really beat up. I'd take a picture but my camera isn't good enough. I don't know if it's just from a lot of rounds going down range in a short time and it's showing some wear, but I don't know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where the round enters the barrel it looks really beat up. I'd take a picture but my camera isn't good enough. I don't know if it's just from a lot of rounds going down range in a short time and it's showing some wear, but I don't know.

Is it possible the timing is off?

I agree Sounds like it could be timing or an excessive cylinder gap. Or both

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Getting a non-threaded barrel is easy.  I'd definitely consider it as having a form of a shroud for #3.  The question is does it actually violate #1?  If so is there another chassis option that does not have mag holder VFG?    
    • So, as I interpret things, you get a hit on #1. It says nothing about feeding from said magazine, just that the magazine attaches to the pistol outside of the pistol grip. And it is attached. Was this what was considered when it was written? 100% no. However, this is NJ and I don't think they would give you an inch when as written it covers it in plain english.  #2 would be a hard yes if you put a threaded barrel on your setup, so I'd not do that.  #3... well it's not a shroud, but it does allow you to hold the firearm with the nontrigger hand without being burned. Shroud is ill defined, and it could be argued to partially enshroud the barrel from the bottom. I would bet cash money that the AG would gladly say that second part there is to clarify the intent of the law and that since you can do that, you violated the stated intent of the law. 
    • I don't know why we ( NJ gun organizations ) have not yet filed a lawsuit on "duty to inform"  A clear violation of the constitution 5th and probably 4th.  Maybe this guys lawyer will and get that charge dropped.  what other right do you need to inform a law enforcement officer of.    are you required to identify as a republican or democrat during an encounter, and by the way,  what constitutes an encounter.  voluntary? involuntary?   time to get this one knocked down. come on ANJRPC stop waiting for court decisions and go on the attack.
    • Right, each location will have a different set of Repeater frequencies you can use in your area.  You could also just have 2 sets of CHIRP files ready to go and make sure you have the ability to program them quickly in a SHTF situation.  Maybe dedicate at least one radio for each location with specific programming, and then when you get there you can re-program the radios you take with you with the programming specific to that location.   More expensive radios have the ability to program them via your phone app and BT connection.  
×
×
  • Create New...