Jump to content
matty

Column about why we don't (and shouldn't) trust anti-gun people [LONG]

Recommended Posts

"... the reason we can’t have a rational gun debate is because the anti-gun side pre-supposes that their pro-gun opponents must first accept that guns are bad in order to have a discussion about guns in the first place. Before we even start the conversation, we’re the bad guys and we have to admit it."

 

Nailed it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"... the reason we can’t have a rational gun debate is because the anti-gun side pre-supposes that their pro-gun opponents must first accept that guns are bad in order to have a discussion about guns in the first place. Before we even start the conversation, we’re the bad guys and we have to admit it."

 

Nailed it.

 

+1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I emailed the author just to say "good job". Got a reply that he's received dozens of positive emails and only two negative. As he said in his email. "Maybe that's telling."

 

Emailed him as well, waiting for a response. Great article!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

An excellent and balanced article with pertinent points.....I've already received 2 positive comments when I posted it on FB. Thanks matty for the link.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ditto the above. I wrote him, something I have never done before in my life, and told him that except for the part about civil war late in the article, he nailed it. Minus that part, I'd love to read that in our NJ newspapers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...except for the part about civil war late in the article, he nailed it. Minus that part, I'd love to read that in our NJ newspapers.

 

I thought the same thing. Great article, slightly marred by his reference to potential civil war.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent him a congratulatory note on a well done pc of journalism and he responded to me with the following.The NYT is a ref to a sarcastic remark I made about looking forward to seeing it in the NY Times:

 

Thank you for your kind words. You'll be happy to know that I've only received two negative e-mails out of several hundred total (and they keep rolling in!). I think there's a positive message in there for us somewhere...

As for getting it published in the NYT, I wish I could! I don't have those resources though. The only possibility is if somehow enough people tweeted and e-mailed it to them, and to all the conservative and liberal talking heads and news shows, until it got national attention. That's obviously not something I can do though. That's up to you and everyone else, haha.

Keep up the good fight; no one of us can do it alone. If you ever want to get ahold of me again in the future, please use my ISU address, [email protected], as I'm not sure how much longer I'll have access to this one.

All the best,

--

Barry B. Snell

Assistant Opinion Editor and Recruitment Manager

Iowa State Daily

www.iowastatedaily.com

[email protected]

563-506-3600

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • olight.jpg

    Use Promo Code "NJGF10" for 10% Off Regular Items

  • Supporting Vendors

  • Latest Topics

  • Posts

    • Looking to pick up a Kriss vector  in 9mm.  Let me know what you got.   Thanks Chris  
    • If you’re going to VA, buy 2 radios.  Program one for here and one for there.  If you guys are buying Baofeng radios do yourself a favor and get a tactical antenna for it,it’ll extend your reach.
    • Both our memories are a bit lacking. 3 bystanders were hit by NYPD bullets and 6 were hit by fragments at the Empire State Building shooting. The bullets later were determined to have passed through the bad guy as I said. He was not a big guy. The police fired 16 rds and 7 hit the bad guy.  Spray and pray?  I think not.  These officers fired until the threat was stopped and everyone is moving. Have you ever tried to hit a moving target whilst you're moving.  If you watch the video from where the police encounter him, the BG draws his gun from his bag, NYPD guys shoot, and the BG hit the ground is about 2 or 3 seconds.  The closest officer is maybe 12 feet or less.  The closest cover are those concrete flower pots.  If the officers chose to take cover before drawing the BG would have had a chance to shoot at least one officer. Know your target and beyond?  Agree 100%.  However, this by the Empire State Building at 9 am during the week.  There are bystanders and traffic in every direction.  The officers had a choice of doing what they did or letting the BG shoot them with his 1911 and shoot someone else. I think they made the right choice and the same one I would have made.  The officers exercised the best option in protecting themselves and the public. The first video is the police shooting.  The second is more detailed and gives you a lot of background information on the shooter. One thing this shows is if NYPD had to use fmj undoubtedly more bystanders would have been wounded perhaps killed.  NJ's hollowpoint law. only creates more danger to the public.    
×
×
  • Create New...