ogfarmer 138 Posted January 17, 2014 http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/2014/Bills/S1000/600_I1.HTM STATEMENT This bill revises the definition of “large capacity ammunition magazine” to reduce the number of rounds of ammunition a legal magazine may hold in this State. Under current law, it is unlawful to own or possess an ammunition magazine that is capable of holding more than 15 rounds of ammunition. This bill would reduce the maximum capacity of a legal ammunition magazine in New Jersey to five rounds. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dwamp2006 1 Posted January 17, 2014 BOOOOOO!!!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
intercooler 41 Posted January 17, 2014 got to out do NY.... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
deerpark 83 Posted January 17, 2014 Surely, this will reduce all the violence in Camden, Newark and Jersey City... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old Glock guy 1,127 Posted January 17, 2014 got to out do NY.... That was my first thought. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve_G 51 Posted January 17, 2014 Same crap Cryan introduced last year Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
boo 6 Posted January 17, 2014 Now this is downright silly. Comparable to Pascrell's 1000000% tax on guns and ammo bill. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DSD1026 48 Posted January 17, 2014 will never happen.. (at least not while CC is here, he's already shot down the need to limit lower than 15) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The_Matrix 105 Posted January 17, 2014 got to out do NY.... After we get 5 rd, NY will go for 4 rds. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dwamp2006 1 Posted January 17, 2014 After we get 5 rd, NY will go for 4 rds. Yeah right, then its a war to single shots only! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Malice4you 627 Posted January 17, 2014 Followed by Kali with 3. NJ would be in 3rd place then, so someone will have to suggest 2 or 1 round limits. Those with double barrel shotguns will have to permanently render unusable the second barrel on their evil 28" barreled assault double barrel shotgun passed down from their grandfather. Or even better, a no magazine law. You must hand load every round. Doesn't matter that some retarded state mandated magazine safeties and the guns won't work without a mag installed, all magazines are banned. And once something like that passes, maybe all non-approved magazines [literature] can finally be limited and banned, too! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SW9racer 262 Posted January 18, 2014 I still maintain that in 3years you will either be selling everything for a loss or leaving the state. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Old Glock guy 1,127 Posted January 18, 2014 I think the point of this bill is to make the 10 round limit bill seem more palatable. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cemeterys Gun Blob 165 Posted January 18, 2014 will never happen.. (at least not while CC is here, he's already shot down the need to limit lower than 15) just wait till CC leaves office, that's when the fun begins. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cemeterys Gun Blob 165 Posted January 18, 2014 I still maintain that in 3years you will either be selling everything for a loss or leaving the state. truth Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SW9racer 262 Posted January 18, 2014 Maybe we have a bit more time. If he just started his 2nd term in 2014, he will be here until Jan 2018. If he is the next president, then doesn't the deputy governor take over for the last year of the term? The new laws will all be passed in mid 2018, all of them guaranteed with no grandfathering. So, we need to be out of nj by June 2018. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
njpilot 671 Posted January 18, 2014 Maybe we have a bit more time. If he just started his 2nd term in 2014, he will be here until Jan 2018. If he is the next president, then doesn't the deputy governor take over for the last year of the term? The new laws will all be passed in mid 2018, all of them guaranteed with no grandfathering. So, we need to be out of nj by June 2018. I don't know the procedure, but it was stated that the LT Governor does not take over. I don't understand why, makes sense that that would be the procedure. Also, it isn't just the last year. It has been reported that if CC runs, he will have to step down next year in order to raise money from Wall Street. He can't be governor and receive donations from companies that do business with the state. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SW9racer 262 Posted January 18, 2014 I just searched wiki, which has the information on the changes passed to the nj state constitution which is why the new lt-gov was created (nj was the only state without some sort of deputy). Even in the past due to the Whitman appoint or the mcgrevy debacle, there are not any special elections for nj gov. Kim would be governor for the rest of the term. So we are good until mid 2018. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nikos 31 Posted January 18, 2014 Same crap Cryan introduced last year What a corrupt piece of lard. After all the lies, sex scandal and abuse of state resources, one would think he would be kicked out of his office but, fortunately for him, NJ has great perks for corrupt politicians. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
magnawing 5 Posted January 18, 2014 So, we need to be out of nj by June 2018. Perfect...my youngest graduates from Warren Tech in June 2017 and we plan to be in the FL Keys by Jan 1, 2018. He wants to go to culinary school in Miami so we'll be moving down there as well. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryan_j 0 Posted January 24, 2014 Could be sooner than that if CC and lil Kim are forced out due to the phony scandals. Two faced Sweeney is the next in line. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrSurfboard 1 Posted January 27, 2014 No chance of even being voted on. Sweeny killed a lot of the absurd bills last time. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
intercooler 41 Posted February 14, 2014 He ain't doing it this time...bet $ on it Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MeanderingCuban 8 Posted February 15, 2014 He ain't doing it this time...bet $ on it I agree, Sweeney has show that he A) hates gun owners B) is Weinberg and Bryan Miller's hand puppet. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtd771 18 Posted February 18, 2014 Maybe I'm reading this wrong but wouldn't a 5 found limitation go against the SCOTUS definition of banning weapons in common usage? What about all the revolvers and shot guns out there that can hold more than 5 rounds. Maybe a limitation law enacted and fought up to the SCOTUS could end up eliminating them all across the country. Granted, I'd rather the test case not be NJ. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyB 4,326 Posted March 1, 2014 Maybe I'm reading this wrong but wouldn't a 5 found limitation go against the SCOTUS definition of banning weapons in common usage? What about all the revolvers and shot guns out there that can hold more than 5 rounds. Maybe a limitation law enacted and fought up to the SCOTUS could end up eliminating them all across the country. Granted, I'd rather the test case not be NJ. +1,000 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gus 33 Posted April 14, 2014 I think the point of this bill is to make the 10 round limit bill seem more palatable. God forbid we have a Fort Hood incident here, well be saying that the new 1 round limit bill will be so that the 2 round limit will be more palatable. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrWolf 0 Posted April 15, 2014 And they expect the criminals to obey these absurd laws while they are committing a crime - I hate this state. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wooly bugger 1 Posted April 15, 2014 Maybe I'm reading this wrong but wouldn't a 5 found limitation go against the SCOTUS definition of banning weapons in common usage? What about all the revolvers and shot guns out there that can hold more than 5 rounds. Maybe a limitation law enacted and fought up to the SCOTUS could end up eliminating them all across the country. Granted, I'd rather the test case not be NJ. I think "common use" is going to be the next wave of litigation after CCW. I heard on NPR just today (yes, I still listen) that the judge in the Tresmond case struck down the 7 round limit. Was that based on common use? I would think that a one feature AWB test violates common use, because it bans anything remotely resembling the most popular rifle in the US. On a side note, the NPR piece was about the looming "assault weapon" registration deadline in NY and how even the people who want to register can't figure out how. The state police refused to be interviewed, and they said that Cuomo isn't talking about it. They also said that violation of the registration requirement is a (presumably expungeable) class A misdemeanor, and it's unlikely anyone will be prosecuted unless they're caught in the commission of a crime. This is from NPR. Interesting. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
miamigunsinc 0 Posted April 17, 2014 It is very nice idea about reduce capacity of ammunition magazines in New Jersey to 5rds. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites