• Announcements

    • Maksim

      NJGF's Gun Range & Store Database   05/23/2017

      Excited about launching a new feature, our very own member- driven range and store database.  Read the announcement and watch the video here... www.njgunforums.com/forum/index.php?/topic/86658-njgfs-gun-store-range-database/

Events & Meetups

Share & discuss your plans for shooting trips or other events.

1,105 topics in this forum

    • 2 replies
    • 438 views
    • 4 replies
    • 324 views
    • 14 replies
    • 235 views
    • 5 replies
    • 677 views
    • 119 replies
    • 7,047 views
    • 6 replies
    • 632 views
    • 5 replies
    • 1,016 views
    • 19 replies
    • 549 views
    • 3 replies
    • 260 views
    • 2 replies
    • 557 views
    • 21 replies
    • 852 views
    • 17 replies
    • 689 views
    • 19 replies
    • 1,020 views
    • 35 replies
    • 1,788 views
    • 4 replies
    • 412 views
    • 10 replies
    • 434 views
    • 58 replies
    • 1,595 views
    • 0 replies
    • 432 views
    • 1 reply
    • 303 views
    • 3 replies
    • 345 views
    • 3 replies
    • 513 views
    • 0 replies
    • 308 views
    • 7 replies
    • 850 views
    • 32 replies
    • 2,056 views
    • 1 reply
    • 355 views


  • Topics

  • NJGF Gun Price Request

  • Premier Membership
    Support NJGF by becoming a Premier Member!

  • Posts

    • .....and now Hollywood is financially backing student demonstrators.....IMO, boycott all movie theatres.
    • Well.... "ineffective" in solving the problem(s) they purport the laws will solve...  crime.  But they *will* be effective in solving their underlying agenda... "disarming the law abiding public."   As for NICS, any efforts to fix it must include a full "due process" treatment that will remove items that prohibit a person from firearms ownership as quickly as they are added. This, in the event they are added in error, or the person has met all the obligations for their removal (if possible). Any items added to the NICS system can only be done after that due process action (i.e. a court order, after a full hearing where the defendant has the opportunity to mount a defense).  
    • It's just amazing to me that he is pushing for laws that will be completely ineffective.  These politicians should be looking inward at the electronic infrastructure that allows/disallows people to purchase firearms.  The FBI should be stepping up and saying "We made another grave error and we need to fix the NICS system right now."  But we, on this board and others, know that that isn't going to happen.   I said it before, and I'll say it again, if any of the firearms rights groups wants to REALLY do something, they should have a political wing that brings up grass roots candidates into the statewide spotlight.  That's what I think we need and I would give what little money I have to a group like that.   However, so far, it's not something I see happening.  
    • "Murphy is pushing forward with the gun laws he promised as a candidate, though Sweeney, even as he supports the laws, says he worries that the problem Trenton can’t solve is how to enforce them."   Be concerned about the potential new laws making felons overnight of otherwise law abiding citizens. Be VERY CONCERNED  - *IF*, they figure out how to enforce them. No one in NY and CT has gone door to door yet - and I used to be of the minds that they won't - BUT he is so far left, Murphy may just push to do just that.  THEN AND REALLY THEN, do you have a massive beyond comparison problem.  
    • I don't give a damn about bump stocks. If they're banned or regulated via a law, so be it. My issue is HOW they want to go about banning them. A regulation from an unelected and unaccountable bureaucracy is not how this should be done. It sets precedent and opens too many doors for the next administration to ban whatever they want through executive Fiat. This will end badly.